Because if it’s the latter, which is what I believe Maxie was saying, then asserting that she said the former would be the straw man
12.03.2026 21:36
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Because if it’s the latter, which is what I believe Maxie was saying, then asserting that she said the former would be the straw man
Are you trying to tell me that Maxie said she was mad at Dems because republicans are stripping trans rights from people? Or is she saying that electing Harris would not have stopped republicans from attacking trans rights?
I absolutely used alt text so I’m not sure why you are lying about that.
💯
This might be the greatest split-screen ever broadcast.
They’ll play this in museums in future.
(🎥 LCI 🇫🇷)
Wow
Absolutely. They just didn’t care what they hit. I doubt they researched much in regard to the targets they chose. They have no problem murdering brown people let alone brown children.
When Trump says "we make a lot of money," he's talking about his Big Oil donors.
They spent spent nearly $100M to get Trump elected in 2024, and the investment is paying off quite well for them.
Oligarchy in action.
It’s even obvious in the reply that I am talking about Conway. I don’t want Conway to run as a democrat in a safe blue district because he ONLY cares about Trump and would not help pass any dem legislation IMO.
lol. I was talking about George Conway. If you are going to read my replies to someone at least get the context of the reply
Please show evidence of me only complaining about democrats.
I vote for the shitty blue option every time but I am not so deluded to think they aren’t also a shitty option that does absolutely nothing or just the bare minimum to help me or anyone else
I was just curious
There’s nothing we can do about racists and misogynists. They are unreachable. The fact is the Dems need to stop vilifying a lot of people in their base and start working with them instead.
Yes incident is the correct word
DuckDuckGo • Duck.ai what is a straw man fallacy A straw man fallacy is a type of argument where someone misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack. Instead of addressing the actual argument, they create a distorted version of it, which they then refute, leading to a misleading conclusion.
Because that is not even what she said. That’s what a straw man is.
💯
I voted for Harris dumbass and I never said I was the base lol
Absolutely!! Sorry about the delay in responding. I have been working nonstop for weeks at this point.
Yes but that doesn’t mean the files were sealed
No I’m saying they can’t prosecute a case if they don’t have all available evidence. If there is known evidence out there, that they don’t have, they can’t prosecute the case until they have the evidence. The judge would have to dismiss the case
The articles are bullshit. The founders of the boycott have already addressed it
How is Nina Turner involved? She told everyone not to boycott Target? That doesn’t sound like her at all.
Both. Repeatedly
I don’t trust one that’s running in a safe blue district as a democrat either.
And the pigs keep gobbling.
Pete Hegseth Blew Billions on Fruit Basket Stands, Chairs, and Crab newrepublic.com/post/207555/... via @newrepublic.com
Right?!? Heaven sounds absolutely awful to me
What?
Do you have a source for that?
Thank you!!
