Antivaxxers are to be blamed for preventable diseases.
@wmuee
Immunologist and since a few years also a spatial biologist. Emeritus Professor at the University of Manchester https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/werner.muller/publications/ #Spatialbiology #Immunology #Cytokines #Infection #Bioinformatics
Antivaxxers are to be blamed for preventable diseases.
I think that the account is run by two people. So difficult to say who did what.
I think I would get lost now.
Congratulations !
Do you mean blogs ?
I agree, needs repair.
And most likely died, because another non-vaccinated person passed the infection to the non-vaccinated child.
If CDU and SPD do not work together productively soon, the AfD will get even more votes next round and can then block any changes in the constitution (βSperrminoritΓ€tβ).
Should it not be Gulf of US-America? America is more and USA is located on part of the North American continent.
There is now an urgent need to collect data on infectious disease spreading in at a time when funding is reduced.
Would you predict that the USA will establish a firewall to restrict access to the Internet in order to take control of which information will be available within the USA?
Gender is an important βrisk factorβ for immunological diseases like autoimmunity. This is why Gender is included in almost all clinical studies as metadata.
Following news. One of many www.bbc.com/news/article...
OMAPs have been updated. humanatlas.io/omap
Omap-23, generated on MACSima can be downloaded from zenodo.org/records/1400...
Will post a some images during this year from Omap-23.
The header image of my Bluesky profile is derived from Omar-23.
Scholargps has improved a lot (on my references) after logging in and correcting for several days (on and off). scholargps.com/scholars/363... . Ranking will be updated in the beginning of this year.
Fixed, it looks much better now, Thanks a lot.
I am happy to see that spatial proteomics is the method of the year 2024. In 2022 we published our MACSima system www.nature.com/articles/s41... , including a very easy to use software for spatial proteomics (Disclaimer: I work at Miltenyi Biotec at the moment).
OpenAlex: Now I am openalex.org/works?page=1... Gordon Dougon on OpenAlex. Very fluid at the moment.
I do not understand why I am not properly linked to my science paper from 1991 on scholarGPS: scholargps.com/search.php?q...
Elicit.com got two out of three references correct, but used additional references I would not use in the context.
Just for the record, ChatGPT (free version) also got the three references correctly. ChatGPT did not judge OpenAlex but offered alternative databases to use.
The errors described above are hypothetical examples based on the known limitations of OpenAlex. The actual errors might vary depending on the specific data and the version of OpenAlex being used. It is always recommended to verify the information from OpenAlex with the original sources. (I agree !)
I tested Gemini (paid subscription) and asked for three original references of my publications that are wrong in OpenAlex. Gemini got the references 100% correct. I liked the summary βThe errors described above are hypothetical examples based on the known limitations of OpenAlex. β¦
I am trying various Ai writing tools now. jenni.ai does not work for me at it only gives me 200 words and a blurry reference at the end of a very general text and asked me to pay if I want to see more.
The authors discuss OpenAlex accuracy at a very high level and do not go into any details or show examples of βerrorsβ in the reference entries. If you find a problem with one (or more) of your references in OpenAlex, please add them here.
I found this manuscript on OpenAlex arxiv.org/abs/2401.16359
paperpal.com seams also to use OpenAlex, I spotted the known problem of OpenAlex with my publication on the description of the VBASE2 database. At least both the cell paper and the science paper are correct. Most likely currently a pre may version of OpenAlex is used. Be aware.
It would be interesting to see what happens in your system pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32958515/
Please add me as well.
Should publications based on OpenAlex data be accepted when no additional data validation steps were included and should online tools using OpenAlex data include a clearly visible disclaimer that the underlying data is most likely wrong (at least at the moment) ?