What is Real Law? - Jurisprudence
Brian Flanagan & Guilherme de Almeida, Lawful, But Not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law, 43 L. & Phil. 507 (2024).Izabela SkoczenIn the article, Lawful, But Not Really: The Dual Charac...
juris.jotwell.com/what-is-real-law/ Check out my review of the awesome paper by @lawstuff.bsky.social & @almeida2808.bsky.social, “Lawful, But Not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law”.
I am honored to be a contributing editor of JOTWELL, edited by profs. B Bix, K Himma and M Froomkin!
04.03.2026 15:28
👍 3
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 1
Perhaps the real ‘two tier justice’ is that the foot soldiers who do the racist tweets get jail time, whilst the lieutenants in journalism who write the racist articles and the colonels as editors who spew out the incendiary headlines, and generals who own the papers, just get lots of money.
24.08.2025 10:15
👍 695
🔁 236
💬 19
📌 8
<span>A defense of dual character concepts in legal philosophy and beyond</span><span></span>
Recent work in jurisprudence claimed that central legal concepts, such as that of LEGAL VALIDITY and of a legal RULE have a dual character structure. Moreover,
I just posted a new pre-print where I argue that dual character concepts are something new and interesting in legal philosophy and beyond and that they can't be reduced to ambiguity, prototypes, or metalinguistic negotiations. Comments are very welcome! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
16.07.2025 19:44
👍 11
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
Strikingly, we found no legitimacy penalty for AI assistance. Hypotheticals featuring courts guided by computer-generated legal research were viewed as just as legitimate as those relying on human staff. @almeida2808.bsky.social, Daniel Chen, Angela Gitahi.
16.07.2025 18:42
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
‘We can’t have a room of robots’: senior judges reveal thoughts on AI
Academics propose randomised controlled trial to measure effectiveness of technology.
A piece in @lawsocietygazette.bsky.social
discusses a report co-authored by Dr Brian Flanagan on the sitting judiciary's attitudes to the technology.
Our research points toward a legal future where AI complements rather than replaces human judgment,' Dr Brian Flanagan
18.06.2025 13:49
👍 6
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 0
Check out the first qualitative study of judges’ views on AI in law: users.wpi.edu/~esolovey/pa... Our focus groups featured a cross-section of 12 UK judges, including 5 members of the UK Supreme Court. Co-authored with Erin Solovey and Daniel Chen.
18.06.2025 09:46
👍 2
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
The more empathetic you are, the more you’ll prioritise a rule’s spirit over its letter.
25.04.2025 21:47
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Even accepting the premise that AI produces useful writing (which no one should), using AI in education is like using a forklift at the gym. The weights do not actually need to be moved from place to place. That is not the work. The work is what happens within you.
15.04.2025 02:56
👍 10495
🔁 3369
💬 104
📌 270
Thanks Paolo! Yeah, skeptical accounts strike me as superficial because they seem to bottom out in an appeal to a brute fact that legislatures will have such-and-such properties or that all legislators will be individually incentivised to converge on some voting rule or other. 🙂
22.03.2025 22:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Thanks for the 'highly recommended' Larry!
18.03.2025 10:28
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 2
📌 0
Collective Mental Action: Turning Texts into Statutes
Abstract. How exactly do we know that a text is a law? This paper argues that purely legalistic explanations are inadequate because they do not explain why
Want to know why legislating is like forgiving? And why policy preferences are of secondary importance? Check out my new paper in the American Journal of Jurisprudence - Collective Mental Action: Turning Texts into Statutes (open access)
academic.oup.com/ajj/advance-...
06.03.2025 17:55
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I feel like Lon Fuller would be conflicted...
18.02.2025 09:12
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
In an ideal world, we would protect young people from accessing dangerous or harmful material, but increasingly, that isn't possible.
That's why in our Advanced Issues in Legal Philosophy class, @lawstuff.bsky.social and I let students encounter legal positivism in a controlled, safe environment.
13.02.2025 07:29
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 2
📌 0
And only the softer kind..
13.02.2025 09:07
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
To be fair if a court said this it would be equally bonkers.
17.01.2025 22:20
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Empathy reveals the law’s spirit.
10.01.2025 08:48
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Seeing ppl talk abt the “Feb submission cycle” for law reviews, so just want to point out that no other academic field forces ppl to finish their papers in sync w graduation calendars, bc no other field delegates assessing publishability to students w 2 yrs of (often inapplicable) study.
02.01.2025 23:44
👍 58
🔁 6
💬 1
📌 3
That’s halfling talk..
24.12.2024 23:53
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The accompanying paper by Samuel Burry suggests that Hart may have felt that his argument had been superseded by Dworkin's new formulation of his theory from the mid-eighties.
05.12.2024 15:53
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0