The next few years will feature so, so SO many columns and Substacks by people claiming that things were going well and Labour just needed to 'stick with Morgan's plan'.
The next few years will feature so, so SO many columns and Substacks by people claiming that things were going well and Labour just needed to 'stick with Morgan's plan'.
Just really wanted his own Popemobile
This is how to answer that toxic question (With slightly different wording if youβre not actually the governor of Minnesota)
Another open goal to revive Starmer's fortunes that he's obviously going to look at for moment before calmly walking off
Hey, my friends saw you at the Woke Progressive and Sectarian Islamist Convention and they said you were telling everyone how to vote
Labour have alienated the voters they had on the left, and failed to win over any of the voters they have courted on the right. Now their core appeal is all but gone and ever growing numbers of voters have exit options on the left, right and in the centre.
Welcome to the Valley of Electoral Death.
I find it hard to believe Starmer would be talking about a Reform win in this way. He'd say they were divisive but he'd also say something about why people find that division appealing right now, and the need for Labour to appeal to those concerns.
Sectarian.
The sheer contempt and entitlement in that word.
Thousands of Muslim voters just voted for a white, (I think) working class non-Muslim woman because they feel abandoned by Labour and agree with her views on a huge foreign policy issue and on immigration policy
To somewhat paraphrase @stephenkb.bsky.social great newsletter, itβs quite the achievement for Reform to have constructed themselves in such a way as to maximise their own opposition, and at the same time, in bizarre inversion, for Labour to have deconstructed themselves to accomplish the same.
Iβm so relieved that even in a βthree way tieβ voters still know how to beat them.
So just as a final word on this by election before polls close:
No matter what the result, Gorton and Denton is supposed to be in a category of safe seat that should essentially render it uncompetitive. The fact that it isn't is a damning indictment of Labour's time in office.
Nor the people bearing the brunt of foreign aid cuts
if only we had a media and culture secretary @roberthutton.co.uk
Trippier and Shearer on Howe #NUFC
Went into βWuthering Heightsβ with an open mind. I really donβt mind adaptations that take liberties with source material. But it is just a very hollow film and does not deserve to do as well as it obviously will.
Means a lot to him. Itβs not a man thatβs given up or lost the dressing room. #nufc
Is it just me that reads this as uhh not perhaps supportive
Presumably it will have to be an internal appointment to replace McSweeney because no one will give up an external job to work for a PM so clearly on the edge himself.
I think whether the job is structurally impossible is important to ask. But in this case the Chief of Staff was clearly unfit for the job: he only understood politics through the lens of petty Labour factionalism which is why he pushed for Mandelson and advised the PM to keep punching at their base.
Good. The UK is not a big CLP to have fun fighting factional battles with.
Thisβby @iandunt.bsky.socialβis the best thing Iβve read on the implications of this weekβs shitshow for UK government, diplomacy and democracy
My thoughts on what is (and isn't) at risk for Reform in becoming "Tory Party 2.0", given recent polling, the dynamics of bloc politics, and the party's popularity with 2024 non-voters: theconversation.com/reform-has-b...
New on FT website:
Downing Street has refused to say whether Sir Keir Starmer knew Palantir was a client of Peter Mandelsonβs lobbying firm when they both visited the company in Washington last February β ahead of it winning a Β£240mn UK government contract.
www.ft.com/content/5bba...
They will also be inheriting a multi-year spending plan which has baked in real term spending cuts for most departments by 2028 just as the next election approaches...
π΄ BREAKING: Labour Together paid controversial PR firm Β£30k to investigate journalists who were digging into how its undeclared funding
Reporters from Sunday Times, Guardian and other outlets targetted
*And* Morgan McSweeney knew about it
Full story:
democracyforsale.substack.com/p/exclusive-...
This is the right take. The Tories now have the chance to explain why a race-baiter and authoritarian grifter like Jenrick belongs with Reform and not them. Will they take it? Almost certainly not. As Stephen says, they see Reform as lost family rather than a distinct and dangerous political foe.
Very easy to lose perspective. It was an amazing year.
We may end thd weekend in 15th place. #NUFC