Tue Helms Andersen

🤖New study: AI can help with data extraction in systematic reviews
Elicit and ChatGPT: ~90% precision vs. two humans. 3-4% confabulations.
AI could replace one reviewer and save time without quality loss🚀
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods📖

@olenorgaard.bsky.social
@cochrane.org
@wiley.com
@StenoDiabetesCenterCopenhagen
@DanishDiabetesKnowledgeCenter

Using Artificial Intelligence Tools as Second Reviewers for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Performance Comparison of Two AI Tools Against Human Reviewers Background Systematic reviews are essential but time-consuming and expensive. Large language models (LLMs) and artificial intelligence (AI) tools could potentially automate data extraction, but no c...

🤖Nyt studie: AI kan hjælpe med dataekstraktion i systematiske reviews
Elicit og ChatGPT: ~90% præcision vs. to mennesker. 3-4% konfabulationer.
AI kunne erstatte én reviewer og spare tid uden kvalitetstab🚀
@Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods📖
English⏬
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... #AI