Name can't be blank's Avatar

Name can't be blank

@algon-33

86
Followers
62
Following
71
Posts
21.06.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Name can't be blank @algon-33

Huh, TIL.

28.02.2026 14:29 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Bostrom doesn't read much SF?

28.02.2026 12:54 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Will keep that in mind.

26.02.2026 23:31 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Thanks for the reminder! I've been meaning to fix the methodolgy and re-run the experiments.

26.02.2026 23:24 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

"I'm glad I inspired you" would work.

23.02.2026 23:28 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Blimey.

23.02.2026 23:28 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Norvid_studies can start by making 2 million posts.

22.02.2026 18:26 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

Don't leak those bits Abel! Norvid's trying to trick you.

22.02.2026 18:12 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0

I've been meaning to write this thread for a long time, and I'm fairly pleased with how it came out.

22.02.2026 15:27 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

a monster outside the workings of the gods working together to slay him. He possessed courage, wits, humility, strength of purpose and the ineffable quality that only belongs to a true champion in spades. If he were alive, who could dare be a doomer?
4/

22.02.2026 15:27 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Now, you might wonder: what's this got to do with Washizu fixing geopolitics? Well, my dear reader, the point is that Washizu was the King of The World who brought Japan back from the ashes, undefeated by any man. To best him, it took the curse of old age and ...
3/

22.02.2026 15:27 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Nonetheless, he's the only one to have fought on equal terms with the inhuman Akagi. The gods revive him as a sign of his favour, and he immediately rushes to slay his unearthly nemesis, but Akagi departs, free to ruin on the frail folk of Earth once more.
2/

22.02.2026 15:26 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

Context: Washizu, the Son of Heaven, faces the otherworldy demon Akagi in a Majhong deathmatch. Washizu pits his wits and mandate from heaven against Akagi's supernatural flow & insight. In spite of all Akagi's hax, Washizu has him on the ropes 'til Washizu's heart gives out.
1/

22.02.2026 15:26 👍 11 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0
Post image

Threads that wouldn't exist but for the grace of the feed.

21.02.2026 13:40 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

Lumenator RCT on myself: Increases some variables by a lot, reliably, especially the subjective length of day and happiness, but also contentment, relaxation, and horniness. Original reasoning for lumenators stands up. Does not improve productivity (surprising!) or creativity.

21.02.2026 03:14 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

The problem with desire is that it gives you tunnel vision.

21.02.2026 00:09 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

>Is Croissanthology lying
Before I answer in earnest, is this a real question or more of an elaborately contructed bait?

20.02.2026 22:46 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

That is helpful! TY. I agree w/ the ultimate take by Alex, that AI will (probably) do to physics in 2026 what it did to coding in 2025.

18.02.2026 11:16 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yeah, that's the tweet I was basing my claims off of.

16.02.2026 19:20 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

TIL the moth-trapped-in-a-relay thing isn't the origin of the term "bug" as used in engineering, which has been around since the 19th century

16.02.2026 17:41 👍 39 🔁 13 💬 4 📌 3

Really? That would be pretty impressive. Do you remember which author?

16.02.2026 16:50 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

A snapshot of a grad student, never able to acclimate more than a day's memories before getting reset.

16.02.2026 10:53 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Like a grad student, in other words.

16.02.2026 10:48 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

It is somewhat impressive the AI could simplify things and then guess the formula AND prove it. So now physicists can collaborate with LLMs in the same way programmers can: do the "high level" thinking, breaking problems down into managable chunks, and then let the AI figure handle them.

16.02.2026 10:47 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

AFAICT, most of the work here was done by humans who guessed some tree-level expressions should simplify in an exotic regime and have a nice formuala. (I don't understand why the simplification couldn't be done by Mathematica.)

16.02.2026 10:45 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Pretty much. While it doesn't quite sit right to me, it's (amongst) my best guesses for what's going on. (Note that best!= good.)

15.02.2026 19:33 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Oh, I agree. UAPs do seem odd and I don't have a satisfying explanation for them. Ultimately, I'd guess it is like ball lightning thing: it sounded totally crazy, no one wanted to talk about it, but turned out to be a strange and novel phenomena that didn't re-write our basic conception of reality.

15.02.2026 19:21 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I'm sure I've told you about the time aliens downloaded my mind

Since it happened at night when I was sleeping, alternate hypotheses do tend to suggest themselves...

But if we get a bet winning aliens disclosure, my p("that actually happened") goes way up

15.02.2026 18:35 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0

Certainly, I've obsessed over model violations often enough, such as encountering some uncomfortable bit of religious lore back in my theistic days. I imagine if I had a manic episode while I was obsessing, I'd have experienced something like what you described.

15.02.2026 19:13 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Also, that does sound pretty intense. How come you were affected so strongly by the nimitz encounters?

15.02.2026 19:05 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0