Beth

is only what they're referring to...even if they use the wrong language.

actually a girl who may or may not like girly things" is literally just that. A female is a female regardless of whether or not she likes "girly" things, etc., and she knows it; sex is innate, and people know their sex 🤷‍♀️

Gender is a subjective social construct, and people know when this

f, m, or nb body that matches their respective sex, and this manifesting only as gender in kids prior to puberty because you know, kids are just kids and one's body doesn't become meaningful like that for anyone until puberty.

The difference between "I'm a boy who likes girly things" and "I"m

have to stop erroneously saying that the core of what's going on with us is about gender/transgender/gender dysphoria/etc., when really it's sex (body one requires to be existentially okay and instinctively knows) being as innately hardwired as sexuality, 1% of people people not being born with the

Such “activists” are under the mistaken impression that parents will see their kid dressing or or playing in a gender nonconforming way, and then introduce the idea of being trans into otherwise...."

I don't love how the rebuttal to the right's "it's just gender" is that it's actually...gender.

We

clarifying that it's incorrect to define us as being our asab and vibing with said stereotypes. It's not "males wanting to become women," but rather, females existentially needing to fix and live as themselves (which if adult of course means being a woman).

outside the stereotypes of their sex. "Not a real man, " etc. (although still, no one is thusly perceived as anything but their sex, etc.; "she's not a real woman" is still acknowledged as a woman, just a perceived failure of one)

But you were responding to a thread about trans people, so I was

It's true that we individually and collectively subjectively stereotype likes/manner/vibes/style/behavior/etc. re the sexes. "A woman must this" and "a man is that," etc. "This personality is not womanly," etc. And it's true that people are socially and otherwise punished for having a personality

instinctively recognizes) is as innate as sexuality so we're talking about literal females, not males "identifying"as the social construct of "women."

We're in really dire straits. A person ("ally?") in this thread blocked me for correcting them when they said we "identify as" instead of *we are*, and for clarifying to them that likes/manner/vibes/style/etc. aren't innate but learned...while sex (body one requires to be existentially okay and

course live as themselves/their sex) in order to literally exist.

*"trans/transsexual/transgender" are 100% the wrong words for us as they denotes across/beyond/one thing becoming another(!)...it should just be a term denoting incongruence re sex

Speaking literally though, about 1% of the population isn't born with the body that matches their sex (body one requires to be existentially okay and instinctively recognizes), so yes, females are born females, who as adults are women, and some females ("trans*") have to fix their bodies (and of

with reality and everything else is THAT existential when your body doesn't match your sex and you're living as the wrong sex.

change, just the way you're born. Like, if you're a female unlucky enough to be born with a male body, that's going to existentially destroy you to the point of depersonalization until you do fix it as much as possible. And that fix entails actually coming into existence, because the disconnect

and nonbinary people. Those are just social constructs, personality stereotypes, that we internalize at a young age. And they might change over time. We describe them with adjective like femme or masculine.

Then there's one's sex, which is as innate as sexuality. It's yes, innate, doesn't

Really think about what you're saying, what you actually mean.

There's one's likes/manner/vibes/style/etc. (personality), and how we subjectively stereotype those re the sexes. Adult females (women) have/should have this or that likes/manner/vibes/style/etc.. Same thing for boys, girls, men,

coincidence or environmental or "gender" that 99% of people always/everywhere are existentially good with their asab and 1% are the exact opposite from the youngest of ages.

about sex being innate, well think about how sexuality is innate; that's just humans having an innately hardwired reaction to the parameters of sex. Yes, humans also have an innately hardwired reaction to the parameters of their own sex (just not attraction-based). It's not

the population aren't born with the body that matches their sex; things go wrong in utero all the time 🤷‍♀️ It's not a transition, it's a fix.

No one *existentially* needs to change their body because their personality vibes with some social construct of gendered stereotypes. And if you're wondering

say you ARE a fan.

And, contrary to the gender bs that's popular at the moment, it is about sex. Sex, being a female or male or nonbinary person, the body one requires to be existentially okay and instinctively recognizes, is as innately hardwired as sexuality. And unlike 99% of people, about 1% of

Don't listen to that person.

"Identify as?" That's some toxic erasure. Do you for instance "identify" as straight or gay? No, you just innately are. It's not some cute vibe choice that connotes you're not actually that. Would you even say you "identify" as a fan of abc sports team? No, you'd

How can we fight terf/rightwing lies from capturing public sentiment when we're repeating those same lies? When we're erroneously calling ourselves "trans" (one thing becoming another) and "transgender" (vibing with social constructs which are stereotypes + how one is sexed is both incidental and

immersing myself in sublime game worlds that are just fever dreams. Existential nightmares crossed with medieval fantasies.

I love Dark Souls 1 and Elden Ring, but I'm terrible at combat...I don't "git gud." I use npc summons and strategize with weapons/potions/tactics/etc. until I get it. I don't even play them foremost for the combat, but rather piecing together the stories (like an archeologist) and

How’s the quest to get the replacement phone going?

born with a male body? Just a deformity 🤷‍♀️

A male born with a female body? Just a deformity 🤷‍♀️

A nonbinary person born with a female or male body? Just a deformity 🤷‍♀️

It's obvious why this critically requires living as one's self/sex, informed consent medical care, self-id, legal recognition, etc.

a male is innate. Being a nonbinary person is innate. Not being born with the body as sexed that one requires to be existentially okay/instinctively recognizes is a birth defect, a deformity. That's all. It's existentially painful and cuts right to the core of existing as a person or not.

A female

part of the aforementioned social constructs 🙄).

Reality is that sex (body one requires to be existentially okay/instinctively recognizes) is as innately hardwired as sexuality and 1% of people aren't born with the f, m, or nb body that matches their respective sex. Being a female is innate. Being

How can we fight terf/rightwing lies from capturing public sentiment when we're repeating those same lies? When we're erroneously calling ourselves "trans" (one thing becoming another) and "transgender" (vibing with social constructs which are stereotypes + how one is sexed is both incidental and

(actually existing as a person, literally coming into being, correcting one's body and living as one's self/sex, yeah, you care about yourself/your life/your body....whereas the person, deadname, who never really existed, couldn't care)