Characteristics that define our hyper-real age; Neo-tribalism, emotive reasoning, chronic cognitive biases, unearned self-righteousness, hedonistic presentism, rapid onset amnesia, black & white thinking, conspiratorially flavored assumptions, addiction to hyper-stimulation, bad attitudes.
We need to stop calling these people Liberals: they are fundamentalist progressives & mostly clueless. "Telling the truth about Jew hatred", by Telling the truth about Jew hatred, by @NickCohen4 open.substack.com/pub/nickcohe...
Ideas matter. This guy's ideas are all over the shop and out there and have landed in the lap of America's most unstable president and his main influences. www.abc.net.au/listen/progr...
Unfashionable idea 537: For Searle, knowledge is most likely to be advanced through free inquiry, and claims to knowledge can only be validated (as opposed to dogma or speculation) as knowledge by being subject to the tests of free inquiry. π§π€π
To politicize everything is to exhibit pure hubris: "I am so confident in my partisan beliefs that I believe the world should be remade in accordance with them." You're one step removed from primates; you're not a god. Learn the meaning, explore the depths, of 'humility'.
"The first thing to do is not to provide a 'practical' solution. Don't act. Just think. The biggest danger today is to be dragged into 'doing'βto act, to interveneβto avoid the confrontation with the fact that we donβt really know what is going on." Ε½iΕΎek
We use to be the tools of the powerful; now, we're the tools, or useful idiots, of algorithms and collective infantilism. A motto for our age might be: "Anything but have to think, carefully!"
βNo amount of evidence will ever persuade a foolβ
Mark Twain www.youtube.com/watch?v=m41Z...
We always start with ourselves. We are not a problem to be fixed with endless techniques, but a living being that must bring practices into its own life and personalize them so they become real, and not the performance of an ideal person we hope to become.
I guess it depends on where you position the marker for the shift from middle to leaning, to firmly positioned, to radical, to extreme. The philosopher John Gray would certainly have much to add to a version of the radical left.
Have you got a similar diagram for the radical left-wing? How about one for their meeting points from a structural view? I'm always interested in the overlap. Thanks.
Thank you to @newbooksnetwork.bsky.social and Miranda Melcher for the chat about my How To Recognize the Mafia Abroad
Episodes wherever you get your podcast
open.spotify.com/episode/6207...
(1) The concept of a hyper-ideologization of existence describes a state where every facet of human lifeβfrom the coffee you drink to the words you use in privateβbecomes a political or ideological statement. It is the collapse of the "private sphere" into the "political sphere."
(2) In this state, nothing is neutral. Existence itself is no longer lived; it is performed and judged through the lens of a specific worldview.
For those paying the most exploitative of exploiters (Spotify): open.spotify.com/show/7Exf03R...
You, dear follower, can find all our past episodes by heading down this digital rabbit hole: newbooksnetwork.com/category/aca... We've been less active of late but there are plans for a new season of more radical content.
Emotional self-restraint is key to reducing suffering in this world. Emotional determination is mostly the product of ignorance. What stories about emotions and feelings have our dominant ideologies been telling? Do they have anything to say about self-restraint?
"The end is in the beginning and yet you go on." Samuel Beckett
My friend Franco likes to argue that dividing the world between left and right is no longer a valuable means for making sense of the world we inhabit. Far better to divide it between the unthinking and ignorant, and those capable of thinking beyond their ideological obsessions. What do you think?
When an ideology repeatedly intrudes into peopleβs life uninvited, through bloodshed and intimidation, lies and deception indifference ceases to be a neutral position.
The many universes theory has convinced me for a while: why would evolution produce one universe when an infinite number would produce infinite evolution? Unless you dispute infinity, there is no reason to believe existence is contained by a single emergence. spectator.com/article/davi...
My friend Franco likes to argue that dividing the world between left and right is no longer a valuable means for making sense of the world we inhabit. Far better to divide it between the unthinking and ignorant, and those capable of thinking beyond their ideological obsessions. What do you think?
"Everything has already been said. But since no one listens it is necessary to say it again."
Andre Gide
"Everything has already been said. But since no one listens it is necessary to say it again."
Andre Gide
Music that makes life seem deeply precious for a moment. youtu.be/Wk02R4UNE3k
Music that makes life seem deeply precious for a moment. youtu.be/Wk02R4UNE3k
"The end is in the beginning and yet you go on." Samuel Beckett
Modern meditation music for the culturally curious. youtu.be/VV-aPK2Gsbk
