Well, gas is expensive, and food is expensive, and we’re doing a war nobody wants, but at least there are no jobs
Well, gas is expensive, and food is expensive, and we’re doing a war nobody wants, but at least there are no jobs
Does he know he has a human right to buy a suit that fits
Finally, we can all die in a closet unburdened by personal connection - the american dream
We can fix that! @magfest.org 👀
I'm sure I'm not the only one with real fond memories of 2 AM JS Joust matches at MAGFest! They also have a bunch of other/smaller satellite events now that could be good fits, too
Just utterly weak logic at work
bsky.app/profile/libe...
bsky.app/profile/astr...
bsky.app/profile/aver...
Picture of a 90s lazer tag gun and the chest-mounted receiver
What happens if you shoot it with a lazer
a bunch of dems in congress just saw all the un-redactions in the epstein files hth
bsky.app/profile/chri...
bsky.app/profile/rude...
my feeling is that if we are going to let AI loose we should start simple and low-risk, like criminal profiling, autonomous driving and medical advice before we let it handle complex tasks
poobin.it is available 👀 🇮🇹
@discord.com Do you want everyone to go back to Slack? This bullshit is how you make that happen bsky.app/profile/thev...
Lots of people I know use substack and it’s depressing because the only thing we can do to fight the evil billionaires is to not use their products and yet we seem incapable of inconveniencing ourselves even slightly to fight evil.
JD Vance loudly booed at the Winter Olympics today.
LOL.... i wanted to hear JD getting booed at the Olympics and when i searched for it on YouTube i got this
VA Senate president responds to Ted crying about VA’s redistricting, which should add 4 new Dem seats.
1. It was not an accident.
2. It was not a staffer.
3. While the president may have dementia his racism is not due to dementia.
4. He isn’t sorry. He means every racist thought he shares.
5. His base agrees with him.
6. He will do it again.
7. No one in power will hold him accountable.
And this is what you say about it? God you're an embarrassment bsky.app/profile/owil...
It was unclear if Mr. Trump was aware that the clip had been included in the video before he shared it. It was unclear how the clip was made, although it appeared to have been generated by A.I. The clip appeared to have been taken from a video that was shared in October by a user on X whose watermark is shown, with the caption “President Trump: King of the Jungle,” and an emoji of a lion.
The New York Times has finally covered the Trump video of Obama as an ape — and they are still providing cover for him. Fuck the Times.
Hope she's real concerned about it
Tells you all you need to know about where @nytimes.com stands
ICE is not a law enforcement agency. They do not care about the law. They are an ethnic cleansing agency that will ignore or violate the law in order to pursue a policy of ethnic cleansing.
That is why ICE must be abolished. Because it is not law enforcement as currently constituted.
can’t not hear and see:
Not in the Epstein files:
- trans people
- migrants and asylum seekers
- people who arrive in small boats
- benefits claimants
In the Epstein files:
- rich white guys who tell you (or pay people to tell you) to hate the people above
Series of anonymous messages from Epstein files signed Jx on the right are several tweets she signed the same way Rowling? To: From: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Wed 3/27/2013 11:13:12 PM Re: ok On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:11 AM, > wrote: Of course you would! I know that. (And thank you) But if I don't see the inside of another airplane or NY until summer I will be a happy woman. Ill let you know when I'm next there. Have fun o the 4th. On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: 4:46 PM - Apr25, 2014 ill explain,, the again when we meet., 1 of course would pay your ticket, if that is the issue rather than lack of available time On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:42 PM, • wrote: I don't know what you're trying to say, wordsmith. I can't go around flying places for dinner parties. Although I'd love to. I may be in NY the week of the 8th, but not sure yet.... On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: april 4th. chud barak peter mandelson. etc. you are agin invited. (the pronuncaiton of agin appropriate )
@hehimta BREAKING A just watched in realtime as jk rowling's superyacht samsara was completely removed from marinetraffic and other services. not just AIS off; the entire vessel listing is gone incl. all port logs. marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details... Nothing to sea here Oops... Something went wrong Please refresh the page, or contact us if the error persists.
🤔 It’s definitely not suspicious at all to have people point out your common Twitter sign off is in the Epstein files and ten completely delete your yacht’s logs right?
"On December 2, 1783, then-Commander-in-Chief George Washington penned: “America is open to receive not only the Opulent & respected Stranger, but the oppressed & persecuted of all Nations & Religions.”1 More than two centuries later, Congress reaffirmed President Washington’s vision by establishing the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. See 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (TPS statute). It provides humanitarian relief to foreign nationals in the United States who come from disaster-stricken countries. It also brings in substantial revenue, with TPS holders generating $5.2 billion in taxes annually. See Part VI. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem has a different take. [screenshot of tweet].
So says the official responsible for overseeing the TPS program. And one of those (her word) “damn” countries is Haiti. Relevant here, three days before making the above post, Secretary Noem announced she would terminate Haiti’s TPS designation as of February 3, 2026. See 90 Fed. Reg. 54733 (Nov. 28, 2025) (Termination). Plaintiffs are five Haitian TPS holders. They are not, it emerges, “killers, leeches, or entitlement junkies.” They are instead: Fritz Emmanuel Lesly Miot, a neuroscientist researching Alzheimer’s disease, Dkt. 90 (Second Am. Compl. (SAC)) ¶ 1; Rudolph Civil, a software engineer at a national bank, id. ¶ 2; Marlene Gail Noble, a laboratory assistant in a toxicology department, id. ¶ 3; Marica Merline Laguerre, a college economics major, id. ¶ 4; and Vilbrun Dorsainvil, a full-time registered nurse, id. ¶ 5. They claim that Secretary Noem’s decision violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2), and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Government counters that the Court does not have jurisdiction, and, in any case, the Secretary did not violate the law. Plaintiffs seek to stay the Secretary’s decision under 5 U.S.C. § 705 pending the outcome of this litigation. See Dkt. 81 (§ 705 Mot.). To decide their motion, the Court considers first whether it has jurisdiction. It does. See Part II. It then considers: whether Plaintiffs have a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; whether they will be irreparably harmed absent a stay; and whether a merged balance of the equities and public interest analysis favors a stay. See Part III. Each element favors Plaintiffs. See Parts IV, V, and VI. Plaintiffs charge that Secretary Noem preordained her termination decision and did so because of hostility to nonwhite immigrants. This seems substantially likely. Secretary Noem
has terminated every TPS country designation to have reached her desk—twelve countries up, twelve countries down. See Section IV.A.2. Her conclusion that Haiti (a majority nonwhite country) faces merely “concerning” conditions cannot be squared with the “perfect storm of suffering” and “staggering” “humanitarian toll” described in page-after-page of the Certified Administrative Record (CAR). See Section IV.A.3.a. She ignored Congress’s requirement that she “review the conditions” in Haiti only “after” consulting “with appropriate agencies.” 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(3)(A); see Section IV.A.1. Indeed, she did not consult other agencies at all. See id. Her “national interest” analysis focuses on Haitians outside the United States or here illegally, ignoring that Haitian TPS holders already live here, and legally so. See Section IV.A.3.b. And though she states that the analysis must include “economic considerations,” she ignores altogether the billions Haitian TPS holders contribute to the economy. See id. The Government’s primary response is that the TPS statute gives the Secretary unbounded discretion to make whatever determination she wants, any way she wants. And, yes, the statute does grant her some discretion. But not unbounded discretion. To the contrary, Congress passed the TPS statute to standardize the then ad hoc temporary protection system—to replace executive whim with statutory predictability. See Section I.A. As to irreparable harm, the Government contends that, at most, the harms to Haitian TPS holders are speculative. But the Department of State (State) warns [screenshot]
Dkt. 100 (§ 705 Reply) at 20–21.4 “Do not travel to Haiti for any reason” does not exactly scream, as Secretary Noem concluded, suitable for return. And so, the Government studiously does not argue that Plaintiffs will suffer no harm if removed to Haiti. Instead, it argues Plaintiffs will not certainly suffer irreparable harm because DHS might not remove them. But this fails to take Secretary Noem at her word: “WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE.” See Section IV.B.2.b. Finally, the balance of equities and public interest favor a stay. The Government does not cite any reason termination must occur post haste. Secretary Noem complains of strains unlawful immigrants place on our immigration-enforcement system. Her answer? Turn 352,959 lawful immigrants into unlawful immigrants overnight. She complains of strains to our economy. Her answer? Turn employed lawful immigrants who contribute billions in taxes into the legally unemployable. She complains of strains to our healthcare system. Her answer? Turn the insured into the uninsured. This approach is many things—in the public interest is not one of them. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for a Stay Under 5 U.S.C. § 705, Dkt. 81.
Even if you don't have time to read all 83 pages of Judge Reyes's opinion barring the Trump administration from rescinding Temporary Protected Status for 350,000+ Haitians, please at least check out the four-page introduction.
It's a tour de force:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...