Learn more and join us here: buff.ly/Gr2vWa0
04.03.2026 22:05
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Learn more and join us here: buff.ly/Gr2vWa0
NetChoice’s Digital Safety Shield for America provides a policy plan for lawmakers on both the state and federal level.
Working together, we can stop digital criminals, protect kids, and empower parents online while upholding the rights of Americans.
A "Myth vs. Fact" document from House Energy & Commerce attempts to downplay the severe privacy, security, and constitutional risks associated with mandatory, sweeping age verification and digital ID.
Here is a step-by-step rebuttal from NetChoice to each of their claims. buff.ly/eOr7xTy
"Like many bills that sound good on the surface, the current version of the App Store Accountability Act carries serious unintended consequences."
Read more by the Washington Reporter: buff.ly/5CpyYbO
On Friday, NetChoice obtained our latest legal victory, halting the enforcement of Virginia's unconstitutional attempt to restrict how its citizens access lawful speech online.
We stand firm in ensuring the internet remains safe and free from government overreach. buff.ly/s1fHwN0
Learn more here: buff.ly/KA8QcVv
South Carolina’s new Speech Code is a disaster for the First Amendment. 🚫
It forces digital services to either act as government censors or implement invasive age verification, putting South Carolinians at risk. NetChoice sued to stop it.
Retailers are going for gold with their ads during the Winter Olympics, with everything from limited editions to official partnerships, giveaways, and more.
Krista Chavez writes how brands are capitalizing on the opportunity to reach loyal fans and new audiences at Milano-Cortina: buff.ly/5iVkcQL
Censorship by lawsuit threatens free speech on the internet.
Section 230 is the firewall, writes NetChoice's Robert Winterton. buff.ly/OCZEfHc
We must not import foreign censorship rules to America.
Read more at @politico.com's Digital Future Daily on why Online Speech Codes being passed in the U.S. mirror censorship laws in the UK and EU by @aarontmak.bsky.social, featuring @paultaske.bsky.social. 👉️ buff.ly/H2UFkEI
In today’s political climate, Section 230's protection serves an even more vital function: to prevent liability from being turned into a tool of indirect government control over lawful speech and political discourse. buff.ly/OCZEfHc
Today, we celebrate the dreamers and doers on National Inventors Day. 💡
America’s tech leadership is built on the freedom to innovate. Let’s keep protecting free enterprise and free expression so our next generation of innovators can continue to change the world. 🇺🇸
We must not import digital censorship to America.
Learn more about our newest lawsuit, NetChoice v. Wilson, here: netchoice.org/netchoice-su...
🚨 🏛️ Last night, NetChoice filed a lawsuit to stop censorship, challenging South Carolina’s new Speech Code.
"South Carolina’s speech code must contend with the First Amendment, and in that matchup, the First Amendment will win every time," said @paultaske.bsky.social.
Europe’s aggressive digital regulations are being wielded as bludgeons against American enterprise and free speech.
Congress must follow House Judiciary's leadership and take action now to protect our rights and economy from this foreign interference. buff.ly/CnzaSUz
Find case resources for NetChoice v. Skrmetti (Tennessee) HERE: buff.ly/j2GHIcB
Find case resources for NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio) HERE: buff.ly/TE6bUnZ
“Protecting children’s well-being is a laudable, perhaps even achievable, goal. But Ohio’s imperative is to achieve this goal through legislation that is constitutional.”
“The State’s approach is an untargeted one, as parents must only give one-time approval for the creation of an account, and parents and platforms are otherwise not required to protect against any of the specific dangers that social media might pose.”
“Minors’ access to information is essential to their growth into productive members of our democratic public sphere.”
“Because freedom of speech is ‘the indispensable condition of nearly every other form of freedom’…the First Amendment ‘bars the government from dictating what we see or read or speak or hear’...and protects ‘the right to distribute, the right to receive, the right to read and freedom of thought.’”
“In every application to a covered website, the [Ohio] Act raises the same First Amendment issues.”
“The ‘loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.’”
🧵 Some noteworthy points from the District Court’s ruling declaring Ohio’s law unconstitutional and permanently blocking it in NetChoice v. Yost...https://buff.ly/1QrgevH
NetChoice has permanent injunctions against similar laws in Arkansas and Louisiana.
NetChoice obtained a permanent block of Ohio’s law in April 2025, in which the judge declared it unconstitutional. The state appealed. In June 2025, a court denied NetChoice’s request for a preliminary injunction against Tennessee’s law, without addressing constitutional merits of it. We appealed.
These laws condition all Tennessee and Ohio citizens’ ability to access and publish information online on whether they are willing to jeopardize their privacy and security.
TODAY, the 6th Circuit will hear arguments in NetChoice’s cases against Ohio and Tennessee's social media age verification laws, which violate the online speech rights, privacy and security, and parental rights of their citizens. @paultaske.bsky.social
