I’m glad I didn’t. It was a great seminar. Thank you for sharing your work with us, and see you in Dublin soon.
I’m glad I didn’t. It was a great seminar. Thank you for sharing your work with us, and see you in Dublin soon.
Schvidler and FWS.
I’m also looking forward to it!
Lol 😂
I’ve most recently been reading a biography of Thomas More—so do I pick Speaker of the Commons, Lord Chancellor, martyr, or Saint?
University of Glasgow #scotland #photography
Huge thanks to Seamus Perry for nominating On the Law of Speaking Freely as one of his books of the year in this week’s New Statesman
Really looking forward to presenting to wonderful colleagues at Glasgow tomorrow on some recent work about Irish parliamentary culture and practice.
Looking forward to tomorrow afternoon's @uofglaw.bsky.social Public Law Research Cluster seminar, when David Kenny (@dkennytcd.bsky.social) of @tcddublin.bsky.social will present his paper 'Ireland, Westminster, and Political Constitutionalism'.
The audiobook of ‘On the Law of Speaking Freely’ by @proftomkins.bsky.social is available now!
Chosen by Lord Sumption as one of The Spectator’s Books of the Year: “Much more than a law book … It deserves a much wider readership than just lawyers.”
🎧 Listen here: https://adbl.co/44zOMbP
A collage of photos of the "SHUT UP! Should offensive speech be free?" event: some are of John Smith Centre Director Eddie Barnes and Professor Adam Tomkins speaking at the front of the room, and some are of the audience watching them.
🙌 A big thank you to @proftomkins.bsky.social who joined us and a room full of students and academics last week to discuss his new book: "On the Law of Speaking Freely"!
📰 Read Centre Director @eddiebarnes.bsky.social's takeaways from the event on our blog: www.johnsmithcentre.com/news/we-simp...
In this week’s Spectator:
🎤 “We can’t grow unless we hear from others whom we disagree with or who are telling us things we do not already know.”
@proftomkins.bsky.social speaks about free speech and why it’s important for public debate and individuals.
@uofgsocsci.bsky.social @uofglaw.bsky.social @uofglasgow.bsky.social
Excellent 👌
Call for papers for a workshop on Economic Aspects of the Constitution: www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_...
Quite a day. Not only did I give my new work, on Swift and the Enlightenment Constitution, its first public outing, but Helen Dale’s deeply thoughtful review of my last project, On the Law of Speaking Freely, has been published here: lawliberty.org/book-review/...
⌛️ There's still time to get your free tickets to 'SHUT UP! Should offensive speech be free?', a John Smith Centre event with @proftomkins.bsky.social.
📅 28 Oct 2025
📍 Humanities Lecture Theatre, Gilbert Scott Building
🤝 Open to @uofglasgow.bsky.social students & staff
🎟️ 👇
Not 👀 as much as 🙈🙉🙊
Speech is 🥶
Justice is 🚫
IT'S TIME TO TALK ABOUT TALKING 🗣️
In our latest blog, @eddiebarnes.bsky.social writes on the importance of open debate and discussion ahead of our event at the University of Glasgow with @proftomkins.bsky.social later this month.
Read it here 👇
A designed graphic with text reading: "EVENT. SHUT UP! Should offensive speech be free? There has never been a more important time to talk about talking. Join Prof Adam Tomkins and the John Smith Centre to examine how to navigate free speech. 28 October 2025, 6.00-8.00pm, Humanities Lecture Theatre, Gilbert Scott Building, Glasgow. With Prof Adam Tomkins, John Millar Chair of Public Law." The graphic also shows the logos of the John Smith Centre and the University of Glasgow.
📢 EVENT ANNOUNCEMENT 📢
Join us and @proftomkins.bsky.social to discuss the law and history around free speech. Open to @uofglasgow.bsky.social students and staff.
📅 28 Oct 2025
📍 Humanities Lecture Theatre, Gilbert Scott Building
🎟️ www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/1818334941...
Toadstools running wild
Published today: on how to fix free speech in Britain (for those who think it may be broken) lawliberty.org/the-uks-spee...
I’m glad you’ve said this. I was wondering what “serious disruption to the life of the community” was doing in these provisions if it didn’t capture what the H Sec appears to be seeking to capture.
It’s not an exact analogy, but the UK Govt published 15 “Scotland Analysis Papers” in 2012-14, in the run-up to the indyref, the first of which was formal legal advice on what independence would mean. Thereafter, the entirety of the UK Govt’s position on indy rested on that legal advice.
A new review essay by me on free speech and true speech, published today: lawliberty.org/book-review/...
The only thing worse than academics running the academy is academics having to stand open-mouthed and aghast whilst they watch others running the academy. (You can add “into the ground” to the end of that sentence if you wish.)
Another opportunity to join Durham Law School as a three-year career development fellow in public law. A great Law School and a vibrant public law community with opportunities to teach in both core and optional modules, and excellent support for research. www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DNX378/c...
Fewer than would have been ideal, I grant you.
I read every evidence session the Committee held, and I will read the report this week coming. It was perfectly clear from the questions asked what direction the Cmte would head in, and equally clear that the Cmte would make a complete hash of it. Not Parliament’s finest brains, nor its finest hour.
The audiobook of 'On the Law of Speaking Freely' by @proftomkins.bsky.social is out now!
The book tackles the problems of contemporary free speech law by applying the lessons of the past to address the challenges of the present.
🎧 Find out more: buff.ly/V00s6Fk