Sorry mate. That was SO bad last night
Sorry mate. That was SO bad last night
What a shit week. Thank f*** i dont support Spurs...
maybe without all the f***wittery
I blame Citrini........... ๐คฃ
somebody pissed on my green shoots in the labour market.
Then poured oil all over them
Great thread.
What astonishes me is that these Buy European clauses are supposedly covered by the EU's legal powers.
I just think thats the most ChatGPT response ever... do something really clever, then overplay its hand and get something really basic wrong
Asked ChatGPT if hulahoops are low fodmap. So it scanned all the ingredients and confirmed that yes, they are, as long as I stick to the plain, salted ones - the BLUE ones ๐คฃ
Absolutely this. My brother is a surgeon; he's used Claude to write an app for his patients. It's not a masterpiece and it won't change the economy, but it is easier for them than trying to fill in timesheets of how much exercise they are able to take. Sensible scepticism has to recognise reality.
IRAN WAR OPERATIONAL TIMEFRAME, ACCORDING TO WHITE HOUSE/PENTAGON:
Saturday: โdaysโ
Sunday: โa weekโ
Monday: โfour weeksโ
Tuesday: โfour to five weeksโ
Wednesday: โeight weeksโ
They have no idea what they are doing or what they have unleashed.
๐คฃ
we are in a weird place. Everyone is talking massive AI job losses - its affecting markets (look at US yields) but there is no way to prove them wrong. So what, we just wait and see?!
No
Think so
๐คฃ
even "mostly" would be a wild exaggeration. How about "a bit"
what annoys me is when people say "its only AI" or "there would be a recession without AI". That's the dumb shit
i'd say less than 0.5% but that's not a crazy take - so no fight here
funny how this series peaked BEFORE Chat-GPT and the job losses have SLOWED with the rapid adoption of AI.
But don't let the facts gets in the way of a narrative
If you can't beat em.... โณ
You have a new technology that makes your workers more efficient. It has 85% reliability but is cheap. Do you a) encourage your workforce to oversee the tech, massively expand their output, and pay them more? Or b) fire them all and use the tech yourself/autonomously?
10,000 word substack to follow
My own reliability is 99%.. so thats my standard ๐คฃ
Its from this website based on a new paper hal.cs.princeton.edu/reliability/...
an extra trillion dollars buys you surprisingly little in terms of AI reliability...
and this seems like the better comparison
was thinking about this chart:
yeah total bullshit
no more than non-grads, which is the only proper comparison because youth joblessness inevitably rises in an economy with no hiring or firing
the quarterly capex contributions are not that large, and as you say, it misses imports - the import intensity of that stuff is huge