James Winters's Avatar

James Winters

@replicatedtypo

Simulating sci-fi novels and calling it cultural evolution Centre for Culture and Evolution | Brunel University London | https://j-winters.github.io

1,296
Followers
689
Following
71
Posts
02.08.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by James Winters @replicatedtypo

Poster for the call. All relevant information is in thread

Poster for the call. All relevant information is in thread

1/6

Excited to share the call for posters & registration for the 2nd XSCAPE Workshop: "Varieties of Externalism" !

๐Ÿ“… Friday, April 10th, 2026 โ€” Gallery Room, Bramber House, University of Sussex

Registration is free but places are limited. ๐Ÿงต

21.02.2026 16:16 ๐Ÿ‘ 21 ๐Ÿ” 18 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 4
Preview
Gradience as a cognitive principle for evaluating numerical notations | PNAS More than 100 historically, archaeologically and ethnographically attested numerical notations have been used over the past 5,000 y; however, becau...

OK, it finally happened! My new article, "Gradience as a cognitive principle for evaluating numerical notations", is now out today in @pnas.org. By focusing on numerals' use for communication instead of arithmetic, we have a new tool to assess their efficiency.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

13.02.2026 19:19 ๐Ÿ‘ 19 ๐Ÿ” 8 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

Apply at this link: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

13.02.2026 12:50 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 6 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
ABSTRACT
The extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) is a school of thought that maintains that genetic determination and natural selection are over-emphasized in the study of evolution at the expense of non-genetic inheritance and processes of evolution beyond selection. Its proponents call for the de-emphasis of genetics and the adoption of a broader model of inheritance that includes cultural and epigenetic transgenerational effects and strong adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Presenting itself as a radical alternative to what it claims is a rigid and ossified theoretical orthodoxy, the EES has lately gained considerable traction among scholars of human evolution, and a distinct sub-branch of the EES unique to the biological anthropological study of human evolution has emerged (the EES in human evolution). To date, however, no direct comparison between the EES in human evolution and other contemporary evolutionary approaches has been attempted to evaluate whether the EES in human evolution affords researchers an edge in articulating good questions and structuring research programs to answer them. After reviewing the landscape of evolutionary theory, we evaluate whether the EES in human evolution is capable of delivering the processually pluralistic vision of evolution it has long promised and whether it brings something that the decades-long ongoing synthesis (OS) of evolutionary theory since the modern synthesis does not. We then conduct a head-to-head comparison to evaluate the relative explanatory efficacy of the EES and our preferred OS theoretical framework on several issues of human morphological evolution. We demonstrate that evolutionary perspectives as drawn from the OS have a much more clarifying effect on the investigation of human evolution than their EES-based competitor. Far from being a radical extension of evolutionary thought, the EES in human evolution offers little more than another idiom in which to tell adaptationist stories and triumphalist narrโ€ฆ

ABSTRACT The extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) is a school of thought that maintains that genetic determination and natural selection are over-emphasized in the study of evolution at the expense of non-genetic inheritance and processes of evolution beyond selection. Its proponents call for the de-emphasis of genetics and the adoption of a broader model of inheritance that includes cultural and epigenetic transgenerational effects and strong adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Presenting itself as a radical alternative to what it claims is a rigid and ossified theoretical orthodoxy, the EES has lately gained considerable traction among scholars of human evolution, and a distinct sub-branch of the EES unique to the biological anthropological study of human evolution has emerged (the EES in human evolution). To date, however, no direct comparison between the EES in human evolution and other contemporary evolutionary approaches has been attempted to evaluate whether the EES in human evolution affords researchers an edge in articulating good questions and structuring research programs to answer them. After reviewing the landscape of evolutionary theory, we evaluate whether the EES in human evolution is capable of delivering the processually pluralistic vision of evolution it has long promised and whether it brings something that the decades-long ongoing synthesis (OS) of evolutionary theory since the modern synthesis does not. We then conduct a head-to-head comparison to evaluate the relative explanatory efficacy of the EES and our preferred OS theoretical framework on several issues of human morphological evolution. We demonstrate that evolutionary perspectives as drawn from the OS have a much more clarifying effect on the investigation of human evolution than their EES-based competitor. Far from being a radical extension of evolutionary thought, the EES in human evolution offers little more than another idiom in which to tell adaptationist stories and triumphalist narrโ€ฆ

A much-needed critique of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) as applied to human evolution, by @evoroseman.bsky.social and Ben Auerbach (2026).

Evolving a Field: Can Evolutionary Theory Provide What the Study of Human Evolution Requires? ๐Ÿงช #BioAnth
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

12.02.2026 19:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 22 ๐Ÿ” 11 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Preview
Existential security and the cultural evolution of secularisation in Mauritius Despite the central role of religion in human history and its continued global growth, an increasing number of individuals identify as secular or atheโ€ฆ

1/ New paper from @brunelpsy.bsky.social CCE in Evolution & Human Behavior looks at secularisation in Mauritius ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ

Nachita Rosun, @matthewmgervais.bsky.social and @aiyanakoka.bsky.social have been testing big theories outside the usual Western settings ๐ŸŒ

๐Ÿ”— ๐Ÿ‘‡

05.02.2026 14:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 12 ๐Ÿ” 6 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Fair enough!

05.02.2026 11:44 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As a side point: the term "tinkering" is not even new in the context of cultural evolution -- Francois Jacob had a paper on this in 1977 called "Evolution and tinkering" and @svalver.bsky.social + colleagues directly refer to tinkering in their papers on tech evolution

05.02.2026 11:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 7 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

I haven't had chance to read this yet, but wouldn't your points be a *good* reason to write a commentary?

05.02.2026 11:38 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Many thanks also to @elena-moos.bsky.social, who just joined bsky. Elena was the master knapper in the new study who made the application of the new method possible.

Follow Elena, and I am sure you'll see amazing stone tools (and even dice!) made by her.

05.02.2026 07:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 15 ๐Ÿ” 4 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Demographic shifts, inter-group contact and environmental conditions drive language extinction and diversification.
#linguistics

28.01.2026 21:31 ๐Ÿ‘ 20 ๐Ÿ” 9 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Delighted that @conradhackett.bsky.social will be visiting Brunel to give us a talk on โ€œIs the world becoming more religious or less religious?โ€, this Thursday 29 January. All welcome, talk will be live-streamed ๐Ÿ˜Š

27.01.2026 09:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 16 ๐Ÿ” 6 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Post 1/13 ๐Ÿ“ข๐Ÿงต

Call for activities proposals !

You are invited to submit proposals for three activities to be held during the upcoming CES2026 conference:

23.01.2026 16:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 10 ๐Ÿ” 9 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

Looking for something new to integrate into an #evolution or #microbiology course? Useful for lectures, labs, homework?

Have a look at our STEPS program, which simulates bacterial evolution, including the #LTEE. Easy web-based interface & lab manual w/ exercises to help develop students' intuition.

20.01.2026 16:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 78 ๐Ÿ” 53 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

Who here nostalgic for Reader?

20.01.2026 23:21 ๐Ÿ‘ 426 ๐Ÿ” 55 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 17 ๐Ÿ“Œ 5
Preview
Donโ€™t Send A Magician To Do A Scientistโ€™s Job: A New Blog Series About Our Experiments In Teaching Science to Young Scientists โ€” Will Gervais Weโ€™re doing some exciting and innovative things with our methods, stats, and skills curriculum and we want to tell yโ€™all about it! Debuting our new bespoke 9-module statistics, methods, and skills cu...

Dusted off the ol' blog after years of heavy disuse because I'm h*ckin' excited to tell y'all about some of the exciting things we're trying in our stats/methods/skills curriculum at Brunel!

Read! Share! Tell us what you think!
#psychscisky ๐Ÿงช #philsci #methodology #teaching

19.01.2026 11:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 33 ๐Ÿ” 12 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

We are pleased to announce that the first LEVANTE data release is now publicly available!

To access and download the pilot data, follow instructions on researcher.levante-network.org/data. This data release accompanies the preprint linked in the thread.

12.01.2026 22:57 ๐Ÿ‘ 39 ๐Ÿ” 21 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

In our new preprint, @chrisvonrueden.bsky.social and I argue that "equality" is a red herring. To understand hunter-gatherer political organization, we must focus on process, not outcome.

Got something to contribute? BBS is accepting commentary proposals!

resolve.cambridge.org/core/journal...

12.01.2026 14:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 6 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

1. My new preprint has its own bluesky account. Why? The problems facing social media & scientific publishing are similar: both are dominated by powerful oligopolies. The @atproto.com tech underlying bluesky that aims to solve the social media prob might also help solve the scientific pub prob ๐Ÿงช ๐Ÿงต

06.01.2026 15:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 52 ๐Ÿ” 17 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 11
Preview
Simulation-based inference with deep learning suggests speed climbers combine innovation and copying to improve performance Abstract. In the Olympic sport of speed climbing, athletes compete to reach the top of a 15 m wall as quickly as possible. Since the standardization of the

Proc B with @sampassmore.bsky.social! We used simulations to explore the innovation strategies of speed climbers ๐Ÿง—โ€โ™€๏ธ Innovation is higher among slower athletes and lower when the population size is larger, and the overall balance of innovation and copying appears to be suboptimal ๐Ÿ”— bit.ly/499QjZM

08.01.2026 14:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 43 ๐Ÿ” 18 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 4
Preview
Consensus, cooperation and collective intelligence in foraging societies | Hunter Gatherer Research Consensus-based collective decision-making is a common feature of political life in hunter-gatherer (forager) societies. In this paper, we ask why. Synthesising evidence from anthropology and experimental social psychology, we argue that consensus-based ...

New article in Hunter Gatherer Research!

Foraging societies practice consensus-based politics. We conduct a xc review and argue that it helps to boost collective intelligence.

Consensus, cooperation and collective intelligence in foraging societies
liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/...

06.01.2026 15:58 ๐Ÿ‘ 19 ๐Ÿ” 9 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Video thumbnail

Happy new year! I wanted to share my new Python package called chatter that streamlines the process of applying AI/ML models to animal communication ๐Ÿฆœ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿต๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพ masonyoungblood.github.io/chatter/

02.01.2026 16:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 78 ๐Ÿ” 26 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Preview
Part II: Why agent-based modeling could happen in economics. Eventually. Three years ago I ruminated on why agent-based modeling never got any real traction in economics. It got a suprising amount of attention and I continue to receive emails about it to this day. I tooโ€ฆ

"Why agent-based modeling could happen in economics. Eventually." Good piece by @mikemakowsky.bsky.social
economistwritingeveryday.com/2025/12/29/p...

I'd argue that the "new era of theory" is already underway, though, led not by economists, but by comp social sci/cultural evolution folks.

30.12.2025 00:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 24 ๐Ÿ” 5 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

My co-authors and I are happy to present our framework "Collective Intelligence as Collective Information Processing (CIP)."

Here we propose decomposing different information processing mechanisms to unify disparate phenomena traditionally classified as "collective intelligence."

30.12.2025 18:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 29 ๐Ÿ” 8 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Preview
Subjective functions Where do objective functions come from? How do we select what goals to pursue? Human intelligence is adept at synthesizing new objective functions on the fly. How does this work, and can we endow arti...

Goal selection through the lens of subjective functions:
arxiv.org/abs/2512.15948
I welcome any feedback on these preliminary ideas.

19.12.2025 03:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 66 ๐Ÿ” 27 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Preview
STbayes: An R package for creating, fitting and understanding Bayesian models of social transmission A critical consequence of joining social groups is the possibility of social transmission of information related to novel behaviours or resources. Network-based diffusion analysis (NBDA) has emerg...

๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿพ very excited to see this out before 2025 ends doi.org/10.1111/2041... with Will Hoppitt in @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social. This paper is an overview of our new R package STbayes, a user-friendly toolkit for performing Bayesian NBDA analyses. @cbehav.bsky.social @mpi-animalbehav.bsky.social

20.12.2025 08:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 80 ๐Ÿ” 32 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

Massive congrats Oleg! Can't wait to see the research group up and running ๐ŸŽ‰

18.12.2025 21:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
The 21st Century Resurgence of Eugenics
The 21st Century Resurgence of Eugenics YouTube video by The British Academy

1/ In a recent @britishacademy.bsky.social video @rebeccasear.bsky.social from @brunelpsy.bsky.social takes a clear-eyed look at the 21stโ€‘century rise of eugenics - an ideology that should have been left behind, yet is now reโ€‘emerging in a number of troubling ways โš ๏ธ๐Ÿงฌ ๐Ÿงช

Watch the full talk here ๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ‘‡

15.12.2025 13:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 54 ๐Ÿ” 37 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Reasoning and Epistemic Vigilance with Hugo Mercier
Reasoning and Epistemic Vigilance with Hugo Mercier YouTube video by Evolutionary Psychology (The Podcast)

This week, we talk to @hugoreasoning.bsky.social about all things "epistemic". Are we gullible and prone to misinformation? Are we vigilant in favor of our interests? Enjoy the wide-ranging conversation!
www.podbean.com/eas/pb-wphps...
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/e...
youtu.be/nf42LNg6y-A

09.12.2025 19:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 12 ๐Ÿ” 7 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜†๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€: ๐—ง๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†
Discusses how more standard network models miss key points of brain complexity. And some more radical points at the end.
Wrote paper having in mind younger researchers more open to new ideas :-)
#neuroskyence
doi.org/10.1016/j.pl...

08.12.2025 18:13 ๐Ÿ‘ 44 ๐Ÿ” 14 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Oleg Sobchuk: Evolution of Literature and the Arts.
Oleg Sobchuk: Evolution of Literature and the Arts. YouTube video by CUDANLab

Oleg Sobchuk @sobchuk.bsky.social
@cudanlab.bsky.social
"Evolution of Literature and the Arts."
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLnZ...

08.12.2025 21:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1