Anyone else remember G vs. E on the sci-fi channel back on the late 90s?
Relatedly, anyone know where to find not terrible quality videos of old school shows?
Anyone else remember G vs. E on the sci-fi channel back on the late 90s?
Relatedly, anyone know where to find not terrible quality videos of old school shows?
"calling trans men anti Trans rights " <- fortunately, that is not what I did.
We do. That is, for all intents and purposes, what impeachment is.
I deleted it, since I can't edit posts here.
Apologies! I didnt even think of that.
Ok.
The user I replied to didn't say or imply a thing about all trans men either. They identified a subset of trans men.
I mean, I appreciate that if it was done in an effort ro prevent a pile-on. Im a big girl, though, i can handle it if it happens :).
Characteristics of a subset are not necessarily characteristics of the full set encompassing it.
Within the set of trans men, there is a subset of them that are misogynistic.
In my experience the majority of trans men *in that subset* are also anti-trans rights.
Im guessing you either don't understand basic set theory, or did not read this exchange close enough.
Say what, that the vast majority of the subset of trans men that are misogynistic are also anti-trans rights?
I've got no qualms saying that to your face.
Strangely, The vast majority of that subset is actually anti-trans rights.
I think he was talking about Steve-O, not Rogan.
Getting my 7mm x 5mm kidney stone extracted tomorrow [shes too big to pass through the ureter, and is blocking it].
Gonna ask the Dr. To keep it. Should I:
A) embed it in a d20
B) set it in a ring
C) put it in a pendant
D) something else
I play Roller derby, and I can't imagine skating in anything else, to be honest. [Yes, some do, but the vast majority of us wear black compression leggings.
Hold up - what is the difference in your mind between "yoga pants" and "compression leggings"?
Yes they are? Like, maybe not those dumb scrunch butt ones, but compression leggings are absolutely pants and suitable for a workout.
That is...actually correct, yes.
So, if I'm reading this right, their business model is "we get your money, "loan it to companies", then give you some money back - but you don't get to control when or how much you get back out.
So...LITERALLY a ponzi scheme?
Whether thats true or not (I actually disagree, but thats moot) - Hariss was decidedly not a fighter. She was a capitulation, regardless of what words she used.
Hariss' slogan may have been "when we fight we win" but her reality was "i will do everything I can to court the non-existing right wing defectors".
What do you mean a minority subset of humanity is not generalizable to the entire population? *shocked pikachu*
Right, but you *can't* do that in Kansas
Thats because you care about queer people and minorities.
I voted for Harris.
Joe and Harris were absolutely pro-genocide. Its not a purity choice to be opposed to LITERAL GENOCIDE. The fuck is wrong with you?
Yes. To get a name change in Kansas, one of the enumerated reasons is being trans. So, they collated a list of everyone who changed their names because they were trans.
Discriminatory on its face AND discriminatory in practice.
But its ok, because theres history of de jure discrimination. ACB wouldn't lie to us!
No. Kansas specifically identifies "being trans" as a reason on the name change. What they've done is coallat3d a list of "all these people are trans" and just wholesale invalidated everyone on the list *regardless of if they had ever changed their gender marker*.
I mean, this action kind of does confirm it, no?
Yup.
American Neo Catholic is full on trad-wife, women have no rights and are barely people, kids are property of their fathers insanity.