ππ½
@neilturkewitz
I write mostly about the intersection of tech & art/culture which these days means I spend nearly all my time trying to address the exploitation underlying current AI models. A secular humanist interrogating modern religions.
ππ½
Yeah, itβs so tragic how many people donβt understand that making oneβs creative works available to the public isnβt an abandonment of your rights to the work. Publicly available =/= public domain! The object of copyright is to encourage creators to share their works without losing their rights.
A very classy class!
Silicon Valley runs on erasure of consent. Consent is friction. Inefficient and not binary. It does not compute. Itβs techβs kryptonite.
I love that it comes with a βtranslateβ option!
βI fear that using AI regularly alters a personβs instincts & habits of mind & heart. When youβve gotten used to foregoing all the little frictions of thought, all the pleasures & annoyances of grappling, then even the ethical imagination can seem like the sort of thing you may as well streamline.β
Donβt you know? People who get themselves killed are losers.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
From the pen of my dear friend & source of constant inspirationβ@daniellecitron.bsky.social
βThe reasonable steps approach is valuable precisely because itβs flexible. As technology & content moderation practices evolve, so, too, will the reasonableness & efficacy of certain policies & practices.β
I agree completely with @bruceboyden.bsky.social here. The response of law to technology shouldnβt necessarily be technological. The object of law/legal interpretation should be to find the through line that connects disparate technological developments to a single moral standard & duty of care.
We shouldnβt be so concerned that Mullin doesnβt have a bachelorβs degree
Plenty of smart, successful people never went to college
We should be concerned that Mullin is unqualified, particularly stupid and ridiculously arrogant-a dangerous combination which is unfortunately very common among MAGA
Did you see Jack Dorseyβs ridiculous comments about why he fired 40% of his staff at Block? GRRRRR!
UK Lords Report, as per @diginomica.com
βwidespread unlicensed use of protected works, coupled with limited transparency from AI developers about how their models have been trained, leaves rightsholders unsure about whether their content has been used, & unable to enforce their rights when it has.β
He says βI'm most upset that it fragmented the conversation across ideological lines, versus one protocol being able to host everything. Maybe that desire was just way too IDEALISTIC.β
I have better wordsββself-servingβ & βill-considered.β By failing to address harassment, he undermined speech.
Jack says βI don't want to be a company that dies from irrelevance,β in defense of telling almost half his workforce that THEY ARE IRRELEVANT.
Iβm not sure thereβs anyone out there more insufferable. There may be folks more explicitly evil, but the nexus of zen & heartlessness is incomprehensible.
good morning π
The House of Lords Digital & Communications Committee just published their report on AI, copyright & the creative industries, and their conclusions could not be clearer.
π§΅ 1/5
- AI training isnβt βlearningβ and shouldnβt be treated as such
The House of Lords has been absolutely consistent on this, and they are totally right. Will the government listen?
/end
Thanks Marielza! As @ednewtonrex.bsky.social mentioned in his thread, the House of Lords has been consistently excellent on seeing through the Silicon Valley hype and rejecting what is effectively a wealth transfer from UK creators to US tech companies. Letβs hope that the government sees the light.
Long enough to do the fandango.
Donβt forget to breathe.
βMight is rightβ has never been so on point in every respect. The fusion of techno fascism & Christian nationalism is astonishing. Small wonder that the Kennedy Center and intimations of Avalon are so profoundly troubling to the President.
Heβs not even the second least sharpest tool in the shed.
βCompetence optionβ is unnecessarily generous. In fact, with this Administration, competence would be a disqualification. Of course, this remains a hypothetical question.
I donβt knowβTuberville gives him a run for the money in that department.
βHe competed in mixed martial arts (MMA)βwhich is like wrestling but for people who killed bugs with a magnifying glass as children.β
βDefending human authorship isnβt nostalgia.
It is a form of cultural resistance.β
Exactly! Strip mining of our souls to produce derivative content paste removed from truth, emotion or meaning is not a future to which we should aspire. Itβs a world in which colors are replaced with gray. Only gray.
Incredible, eh?
Uraeus (2017-2018), by Anselm Kiefer
Rockefeller Center, NYC
#WorldBookDay (UK & Ireland)