our Chem. Rev. on QM calculations of circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) is finally out with page numbers pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.... #chemsky
our Chem. Rev. on QM calculations of circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) is finally out with page numbers pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.... #chemsky
VCD (vibrational circular dichroism) is a powerful technique but with low signal intensity... unless Co(II) decides to join the party! onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... #Chemsky
finally retracted www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... @retractionwatch.com #chemsky 🧪 this is instead our paper confuting the retracted one onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... with @gianluigialbano.bsky.social
#Chemsky
re-posting to #Chemsky: proud to announce that our review on quantum-mechanical CPL calculations just appeared on Chemical Reviews, and it's open access pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
proud to announce that our review on quantum-mechanical CPL calculations just appeared on Chemical Reviews, and it's open access pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/... 🧪⚗️
All Wiley journals are down 🧪⚗️
Hold on, everyone! A new chiroptical spectroscopy has been discovered and nobody told me? link.springer.com/article/10.1... #Chemsky
😀
my last attempt to restore a relationship with Elsevier @elsevierps.bsky.social I don't expect they will reply, though. #researchintegrity @pubpeer.com #chemsky 🧪
our paper rebutting claim that Raman can distinguish enantiomers is finally out onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... Never accepted by Spectrochimica Acta A despite 2 positive reviews, withdrawn after 2 months... while the flawed paper is still on their website #chemsky #researchintegrity 🧪
second refused review for an Elsevier journal in two days #chemsky #researchintegrity 🧪and ongoing
keeping declining *any* invitation as referee, author, special issue editor from @elsevierps.bsky.social #researchintegrity #chemsky 🧪
fighting with ACS @pubs.acs.org and Italian CRUI about open access contract... do you know what a "primary author" is? is it legit that the CARE CRUI contract only applies to the "submitting corresponding author" and not to other corresponding authors? #chemsky 🧪
I still get messages from SSRN that our preprint is among the top downloads, while the paper has been withdrawn 😂 good job @elsevierconnect.bsky.social
2 months after submission, 1 month after receving 2 acceptance recommendations, our commentary on Spectrochimica Acta A (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....) was still held by the editor with no reason, so we withdrew it. I will post the whole story soon... #ChemSky #ResearchIntegrity 🧪
while our commentary to the infamous paper is still stuck at the editor after 2 months with no reason, the preprint has become a top download :D papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... #ChemSky #researchintegrity @pubpeer.com
didn't know that! I will surely look for this story
from what I learned from this experience, only a convinced editor can force a retraction. sorry, not only convinced, but also fair and ethical and transparent and many other things which don't apply here
that's funny, pubpeer finds my institutional mail has an invalid domain 😂
thanks for the suggestion. I will subscribe PubPeer and post the whole story there
what is fbs, sorry?
yes I have, but apparently was not enough. I quoted it in my first post on that paper on #bluesky papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
3 months after publication the paper claiming that Raman can distinguish enantiomers is still there www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... while our commentary is stuck in the editorial offices of @elsevierconnect.bsky.social Such a transparency and fairness! #ChemSky #researchintegrity
that's what I miss!!
or this one? "If an editor has convincing evidence that a retraction is required, they should not delay retraction simply
because the authors are not cooperative." @elsevierconnect.bsky.social 🧪#chemsky
... this one? "Publications should be retracted as soon as possible after the editor is convinced that the publication is
seriously flawed" @elsevierconnect.bsky.social #chemsky 🧪
1- In our struggle to get our commentary (on the paper about enantiomer-discriminating Raman❗) published (45 days-and not yet), one editor from @elsevierconnect.bsky.social
recalled they "need to follow the COPE guidelines". doi.org/10.24318/cop... #chemsky 🧪 What about ...
ins't it called carbon dioxide + water? :D
😀🛟