Lex 's Avatar

Lex

@lexnyc

We have it in our power to begin the world over again.

82
Followers
598
Following
20
Posts
01.07.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Lex @lexnyc

Fwiw, SF Superior has a free docket on its website

07.07.2023 21:00 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Fun opportunity to file consumer fraud and housing discrimination counterclaims

07.07.2023 02:01 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Courts (especially in California with its specificity pleading requirement) know that employers constantly try to threaten employees who go to work for competitors and tend to regard these sorts of claims as meritless bullying until clearly shown otherwise.

07.07.2023 01:21 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

That is true, but the letter fails to identify a single specific piece of trade secret information that they have disclosed or used. That is why this reads as a β€œthe client told me to write a thread letter” one and not a β€œwe have a serious claim we could plausibly litigate” one.

07.07.2023 01:17 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

No - that’s just general skill and knowledge. It doesn’t meet the definition of a protected trade secret. You don’t get to own your ex employees and prevent them working for a competitor just because your employees know how to do their jobs.

06.07.2023 21:12 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

CA also requires pleading with specificity in trade secrets lawsuits. You have to identify the particular protected information with particularity at the outset.

06.07.2023 21:04 πŸ‘ 20 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

He’s definitely regretting buying that mummified monkey’s paw, right?

06.07.2023 02:13 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

First threet?

06.07.2023 02:10 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I made the same joke (but not joke) yesterday. It would be helpful if they added a feature to allow contact detail sharing without sharing it with everyone though, even if they don’t add DMs

05.07.2023 14:16 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

FWIW, I’d still view judicial reform as a high priority - particularly adding lower court judgeships to keep up with caseload growth (and dilute ideologues) and reforming SCOTUS so it sits in panels with a majority of the panel being judges temporarily designated from Circuit courts

05.07.2023 14:13 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I agree that ~95% of the worst stuff from this court (anything related to administrative law or statutory interpretation) is solvable through a majority in Congress and abolishing the filibuster.

05.07.2023 14:10 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Email is the BlueSky version of DMs

04.07.2023 23:23 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Cc: @murphtracks.bsky.social @skywatch.bsky.social

04.07.2023 19:26 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Know anytime with a mute list for these lot?

04.07.2023 19:24 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Are they really going to do it in a way that effectively bans anonymous accounts? If so, no way it takes off

04.07.2023 13:20 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Bloasts also acceptable

02.07.2023 15:36 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Split the difference. Skoasts.

02.07.2023 15:27 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Compromise on bloasts?

02.07.2023 11:46 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Is there a donation option to help you buy sufficient capacity?

01.07.2023 21:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Tip jar is a much more viable business model for somewhere that doesn’t hate its users.

01.07.2023 21:16 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0