Torey Dolan's Avatar

Torey Dolan

@toreydolan

Assistant Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Law School. An Indian writing about Federal Indian Law/Voting Rights. Views are my own. Citizen of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma living on Ho Chunk LandπŸ“

311
Followers
131
Following
102
Posts
20.02.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Torey Dolan @toreydolan

I’ve seen many instances such as this, describing the United States as a settler-colony in the past tense, and the ahistorical analysis of the history of Indian citizenship in the birthright citizenship debate completely obfuscate the nature of the U.S. constitution and American law as colonial.

08.03.2026 20:09 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
How B.C.'s conflicting Indigenous land claims are a problem 150 years in the making Even before BC became a province, its leaders failed to sign treaties, which caused an impossibly messy problem to clean up. Learn more

When Billie Eilish said β€œno one is illegal on stolen land,” Professor Epstein wrote a glib op-ed dismissing that statement without engaging the legal doctrine of aboriginal title. Like the Nations in British Columbia, many California Tribes have outstanding claims.

nationalpost.com/news/canada/...

08.03.2026 20:06 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

#SCOTUS just granted emergency relief in *both* the California teachers case (putting back on hold, at least in this case, California’s law barring teachers from outing transgender students to their parents) *and* the Malliotakis redistricting cases.

The Democratic appointees dissented in both.

02.03.2026 23:05 πŸ‘ 495 πŸ” 115 πŸ’¬ 11 πŸ“Œ 9

πŸ™ƒ

02.03.2026 23:13 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE
KAGAN would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE JACKSON joins,
dissenting from denial of certiorari.
This case asks whether federal law prohibits the poorest
prisoners from splitting the $350 fee required to file a federal lawsuit when it allows everyone else to do so. The answer statutorily appears to be no. Because the decision below held otherwise and deepened a split among the Courts
of Appeals, the Court should grant the petition for a writ of
certiorari.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE KAGAN would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE JACKSON joins, dissenting from denial of certiorari. This case asks whether federal law prohibits the poorest prisoners from splitting the $350 fee required to file a federal lawsuit when it allows everyone else to do so. The answer statutorily appears to be no. Because the decision below held otherwise and deepened a split among the Courts of Appeals, the Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Petitioners Topaz Johnson and Ian Henderson were incarcerated at High Desert State Prison in California when
they filed this lawsuit in federal court. According to their
complaint, corrections officers forced them and a third prisoner to stand in filthy cages that reeked of urine and measured 2.5 feet by 2.5 feet. They alleged that the officers
forced them to stand in those cages for nearly nine hours
with their hands cuffed behind their backs.

Petitioners Topaz Johnson and Ian Henderson were incarcerated at High Desert State Prison in California when they filed this lawsuit in federal court. According to their complaint, corrections officers forced them and a third prisoner to stand in filthy cages that reeked of urine and measured 2.5 feet by 2.5 feet. They alleged that the officers forced them to stand in those cages for nearly nine hours with their hands cuffed behind their backs.

By a 6–3 vote, SCOTUS refuses to review a judge-made rule that bars indigent prisoners from splitting the filing fee among themselves when filing a federal suitβ€”even though everyone else is allowed to split that fee. These defendants were allegedly tortured. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...

02.03.2026 14:35 πŸ‘ 1671 πŸ” 685 πŸ’¬ 39 πŸ“Œ 53

bsky.app/profile/alja...

Nothing justifies this.

28.02.2026 16:13 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The majority of Americans oppose a war with Iran (estimated between 70% and 85%).

When is democratic representation going to kick in on foreign policy? The U.S. has been engaged in military actions in the Middle East my entire life thus far. When does it end?

28.02.2026 16:12 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Amazing news about Alaska Native language revitalization and integration in Alaska pedagogy πŸ™Œ

26.02.2026 00:36 πŸ‘ 29 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

Article I vests Congress with the power to tax and spend for the general welfare. The president β€”let alone the Vice Presidentβ€”does not have the authority to do this.

General welfare β‰  β€œgood stewards”

25.02.2026 23:59 πŸ‘ 30 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Episode 41: Professors Torey Dolan and Steve Wright discuss Louisiana v. Callais and the Voting Rights Act at the US Supreme Court A remotely recorded podcast with Professor Torey Dolan (Law Repository) and Professor Steve Wright (Law Repository) at the University of Wisconsin Law School. In a special edition of the Wisconsin…

Torey Dolan and Steven Wright join the Wisconsin Law in Action podcast to discuss how the Voting Rights Act has been challenged and debated at the Supreme Court in recent years, focusing on the Louisiana v. Callais case. Listen and subscribe: buff.ly/eXTcBMT.

25.02.2026 00:26 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I've been predicting that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Callais gets another "Alito special:" As in Brnovich, a decision cutting out the heart of the Voting Rights Act without striking it down formally and taking the political heat.

24.02.2026 18:18 πŸ‘ 72 πŸ” 28 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
ABA moves to axe US law school diversity requirements The American Bar Association is poised to eliminate its diversity and inclusion requirement for law schools amid legal uncertainty and political pressure.

Well, this sucks www.reuters.com/legal/legali...

25.02.2026 13:42 πŸ‘ 17 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

A new vote by mail legal rabbit hole I will be falling into πŸ™ƒ

24.02.2026 21:59 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

this is some bullshit. the Court is giving sovereign immunity to postal workers who allegedly engaged in intentional racial discrimination

Thomas's rationale is that you can't sue the government over lost mail, but there's a difference between mail that's lost and mail that's withheld bc of racism!

24.02.2026 15:36 πŸ‘ 1056 πŸ” 340 πŸ’¬ 34 πŸ“Œ 13
23.02.2026 14:56 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Don't look at the Court's correct ruling on tariffs and what I anticipate to be a correct striking down of the birthright citizenship executive order as evidence of a moderate Supreme Court. The Justice have done, and continue to do, lots of mischief, including accreting more power for themselves.

20.02.2026 16:57 πŸ‘ 492 πŸ” 105 πŸ’¬ 22 πŸ“Œ 5
Post image

I already taught separation of powers between the President and Congress this semester, you can’t make me go back!

20.02.2026 17:06 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

BREAKING: The Department of Education has ended its directive that attempted to restrict diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in schools nationwide.

This is a victory for academic freedom and education equity.

18.02.2026 17:39 πŸ‘ 41053 πŸ” 10833 πŸ’¬ 476 πŸ“Œ 1027
Post image

Legal Academia needs a publishing forum for memes so I can get my con law memes published.

18.02.2026 22:15 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
25A914

NEW: The U.S. Supreme Court has received an emergency request from Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York to pause a state judge’s order for a new congressional map that would redraw Malliotakis’ district, which the judge found illegally dilutes Black and Latino voters’ collective power

13.02.2026 20:43 πŸ‘ 17 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
β€œOur communities are being erased in real time β€” first from our streets through aggressive immigration enforcement, and now from the data that determine political power and public investment for the next decade.

β€œTwo years ago, the Census Bureau set forth plans for a 2026 census test that was intended to be a field test of Census 2030 operations. Last week, the Bureau abruptly released β€” without stakeholder engagement β€”  a drastic proposal to change its testing plan. These changes include testing a citizenship question, dramatically reducing the number of testing sites from six to just two, testing in areas without a substantial Latino population, and other significant changes. If the Bureau proceeds with these plans, it will fail to obtain reliable information on how to reach hard-to-count communities, including Latinos β€” particularly very young Latino children who have experienced persistent and growing undercounts.

β€œThis is unacceptable and would set the Bureau up to fail in 2030 by sabotaging its ability to obtain a fair and accurate count of Latinos and the nation’s population as a whole.

β€œAn undercount of Latinos in 2030 would result in fewer resources for schools, health care, housing, and emergency services, and less representation in our democracy. The Constitution is clear: everyone who lives here must be counted. NALEO Educational Fund, alongside our NALEO members, will continue working with congressional leaders and community partners to demand robust testing, transparency, and a census that counts every person. Our communities deserve to be safe, seen, and counted β€” not erased.”

β€œOur communities are being erased in real time β€” first from our streets through aggressive immigration enforcement, and now from the data that determine political power and public investment for the next decade. β€œTwo years ago, the Census Bureau set forth plans for a 2026 census test that was intended to be a field test of Census 2030 operations. Last week, the Bureau abruptly released β€” without stakeholder engagement β€” a drastic proposal to change its testing plan. These changes include testing a citizenship question, dramatically reducing the number of testing sites from six to just two, testing in areas without a substantial Latino population, and other significant changes. If the Bureau proceeds with these plans, it will fail to obtain reliable information on how to reach hard-to-count communities, including Latinos β€” particularly very young Latino children who have experienced persistent and growing undercounts. β€œThis is unacceptable and would set the Bureau up to fail in 2030 by sabotaging its ability to obtain a fair and accurate count of Latinos and the nation’s population as a whole. β€œAn undercount of Latinos in 2030 would result in fewer resources for schools, health care, housing, and emergency services, and less representation in our democracy. The Constitution is clear: everyone who lives here must be counted. NALEO Educational Fund, alongside our NALEO members, will continue working with congressional leaders and community partners to demand robust testing, transparency, and a census that counts every person. Our communities deserve to be safe, seen, and counted β€” not erased.”

NEW: @naleoofficial.bsky.social says if the Census Bureau moves forward with its planned cutbacks to the 2026 Census Test, they will "set the Bureau up to fail in 2030 by sabotaging its ability to obtain a fair and accurate count of Latinos and the nation’s population as a whole"

12.02.2026 15:12 πŸ‘ 27 πŸ” 25 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

Timely and needed!

10.02.2026 14:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1

LOL

06.02.2026 21:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ironically, he ends with some knock on β€œperformative politics.” Well, I take offense at performative legal grandstanding that assumes without engagement that Indigenous land claims are not legal claims but solely moral claims.

05.02.2026 21:52 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Skimmed this piece out of pure masochism and despite all its legalese, there seems to be no engagement with the doctrine of aboriginal title or the reality that the Senate’s refusal to ratify the California Indian Treaty clouds land claims in California.

05.02.2026 21:52 πŸ‘ 30 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

As far as I know, this is DHS's first effort to explain their position that I-205 forms allow entry into the home. They rely on the dicta in the 1960 Abel case (before Payton) and re-imagine the plurality opinion in Lucas as if it were the majority (and then overrely on it).

05.02.2026 07:55 πŸ‘ 715 πŸ” 207 πŸ’¬ 26 πŸ“Œ 25
Screenshot of order denying emergency application, with no noted dissents.

Screenshot of order denying emergency application, with no noted dissents.

As expected, #SCOTUS denies the emergency application to block California’s congressional redistrictingβ€”with no public dissents.

Among other things, this is also a good addition to the β€œbe cynical but not nihilistic about the Court” file.

04.02.2026 19:05 πŸ‘ 1445 πŸ” 223 πŸ’¬ 25 πŸ“Œ 6

If the 216k word article was accepted, could you imagine how that average would look?!

04.02.2026 22:16 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I want to meet her.

04.02.2026 22:11 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Leaving aside the rest of the inappropriateness of this, I wanna know how enforcement works. Does the Supreme Court file suit in district court?

03.02.2026 00:08 πŸ‘ 40 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0