Should be standard time, that's how nature intended it.
Should be standard time, that's how nature intended it.
3 biggest gripes on the election trail; gas, groceries and no war.
They are 0 for 3, AND had the administration turn on the second amendment...and still they sing support.
What exactly will it take? They said a vote for Kamala would see war in Iran... guess they were right, round-about π΅βπ«
These are definitely all words. "Shield of the Americas"??? Tf? We just naming shit after Marvel now? Won't be surprised to see Hydra next... what a joke.
What about that person, and that one, and what that one did, if I keep pointing out all these other things, it will suddenly make this very real thing that I don't like untrue, right!?!?!
That's called a what about, and isn't good faith discussion. What others do is irrelevant to what Net did.
Giving Farquad vibes.
This. The claim that the Epstein files can produce no further arrests is a blatant lie to protect predators.
AND AGAIN I SAY; This didn't age well lmfao
Try and say that cruelty isn't the point when they do shit like this.... don't fucking make them SERVE YOU then turn around and say "good food, now off to the camps!!"
We also know why Trump will start being REALLY stupid in regard to those countries; THEY won't hide discovery.
The truth is coming out, one way or another.
Voters are absolutely an inconvenience. That's been made quite clear...
So....Bad bunny can run for president, but his people couldn't vote for him despite being citizens...
When we take the white house back, we should fix this....
MAGA; "Stop calling us racist!!!"
My reply; stop posting, laughing at, cheering and FORGIVING over racism.
And ANOTHER J6er back behind bars. Huh, its almost like they are CRIMINALS.
I'm right here π€·ββοΈ bring it.
The only reason to be so angry about being followed, is if the intent to do wrong is there.
So who wants to tell them there ARE Republicans who live in those states...who have votes that have literally never mattered, like ever. They may as well not even vote!
If 49% votes red, and 51% votes blue, the electorate goes blue.... the red is now just.....irrelevant. Doesn't seem like good math
So when do we want to talk about how the rights example of why the electoral college SHOULDN'T be dismantled is actually a perfect example for why it SHOULD?
They always point yup Cali and New York saying "those states would decide the election"....-
And "following orders" won't be an argument that saves them.
Nothing has been done that can't be undone. And it doesn't require a foreign power; which was the argument i made. References to Nuremberg does not require a play by play repeat; it is simply people pointing out that all these dipshits WILL eventually have to face what they've done
If there were anything to prosecute. Ye of very little imagination. You realize each of those J6ers was guilty of MANY crimes, right? You realize only a fraction were charged, right? Double jeopardy, and the pardon, are only for crimes tried. They could easily nail them for other crimes.
A lawsuit would require discovery.... and this would finally reveal unredacted proof.
Go ahead, sure, sue over this. I'm intrigued.
Literally has nothing to do with it, barely even registered as sensical.
If one president can weapons the system, so can another. If you truly believe he's done anything that can't be undone, I suggest it is you who needs to look deeper. And none of this has anything to di with the original comment
So because YOU personally believe that once Trump and co are removed that no one will be able to do anything, you'll assert the false narrative that drawing any parallel to Nuremberg is removed from reality... ALMOST makes some form of logical sense.
No. It doesn't. Sorry.
Drawing a parallel to Nuremberg does not at all mean a foreign nation would HAVE to overthrow us and all that. Its drawing the parallel to the act of holding those responsible when they are no longer in power, and the bit about not being able to claim "following orders" would 100% hold.
Sorry, but "I was just following orders" isn't a reasonable defense. You could have shown some spine and REFUSED ILLEGAL ORDERS. But you chose spineless and will go down with the rest.... unless you wanna flip for leniency; its only ever given to the first few to spill.
"You can't show up with a gun, you just can't" and "I don't know any peaceful protestor that shows up armed with ammunition"
OHHHHHH ok so NOW we agree J6 was a RIOT not a peaceful protest and Rittenhouse was wrong for being armed? Really? Or was it ok for your guys just no one else? ππ€£
Omfg I just really want the Supreme Court to just start striking everything of his down at this threat. Seriously.
Pft if that ain't the truth. Always rules for thee not for me with the cheetoh in chief.
Once again the group that elected the man for "saying what he means" spends all their time clarifying that he doesn't mean what he said.
Pathetic.
Is it true older people have seen and experienced more? Yes.
Does that automatically make them better writers as implied? It does not. Sorry, lived experience doesn't make up for poor writing skills. But they ARE wonderful resources for a wealth of knowledge.