www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Wikipedia "summaries" are what? Lead sections?
Given the hoo-hah over corpus linguistics applied to WP, interesting that WP, with an explicit policy on neutral point of view, is showing up as less liberal than LLMs. Which do not have content policies, and come without disclaimers.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_S...
And "Polk Salad Annie".
Presumably Vance wants to work up the Catholic hierarchy, and take on the vice-Pope. Then he'd be in a position to run for Pope himself.
Wow. So Trump is no FDR, no Truman and no Eisenhower. Also fails to be Washington and Lincoln.
Hmmm, hmmm. From where I sit (i.e. in front of Wikimedia content), the macro view that AI will "produce knowledge" in a valuable large-scale way real soon doesn't ring true. But the micro view that AI-supported search in the right hands brings power to a researcher's elbow holds water.
More interesting, technically speaking, is a "sloppy" mistake about Cecil Grant's Oxford degree. GP states he got a second class after two years; in fact he got a third in Greats in four years, in 1893. The source by Foster that GP cites was in the press in 1893.
Depths of Grokipedia, #5. Article on Cecil Grant tells us, anachronistically, that Keswick is in Cumbria. And waffles inordinately.
grokipedia.com/page/cecil_g...
Indeed, but IMDB is not a "reliable source" in Wikipedia's terms. "More research required."
new blog: "Rescuing Scholia #3: We did it!" https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2026/02/28/rescuing-scholia-3-we-did-it.html https://doi.org/10.59350/kd793-2fe02
"For now, however, please use qlever.scholia.wiki." https://qlever.scholia.wiki/
#wikidata #scholia #qlever #sparql
Victorianists! Can you prove that "Mrs Scarisbrick" in this NPG lithograph is the mistress (not wife) of the very rich Charles Scarisbrick (1802-1860)? About whom I have just written a Wikipedia article.
www.npg.org.uk/collections/...
A question: Does anybody have any experience (or info they could point me to) extracting author affiliation information from the pdfs of books and/or articles, using AI or other automated processes?
"By our calculations Russia captured only 0.83% of Ukrainian territory in 2025".
Attitudes toward #STEM are highly influenced by oneβs own educational experiences.
βA joyful dayβ: final piece of Sagrada Familiaβs central tower put in place
AI fever sparks Raspberry Pi meme stock frenzy ft.trib.al/wRQULD2
@gobond.bsky.social
Charles Matthews interested in the Gobase situation and
gobase.org/studying/art... .
Go-related post. I hear that some content from gobase.org is being migrated to gobasearticles.org. I have many articles at gobase.org/studying/art....
Dutch Go Association: who is handling this?
Start from the premise that the US has 5% of the world's population, even if it has a larger proportion of the world's money. The state of health of 95% of the human race must count for something.
The Trump administration is dismantling Americaβs climate databases, firing expert staff and deleting key reports and analyses. Such actions will make important modelling harder
Have to say that Fergie doesn't belong in the same sentence as "politics" or "class".
Jess Wade started a Wikipedia article for her, in 2018.
Dynastic Egyptians, a Simpsons character, these I can believe.
Depths of Grokipedia #4: grokipedia.com/page/dorman_...
"The coat of arms for the Dorman baronets has not been reliably documented in available sources." That reflects the total reliance of GP on the Web. Try opening a book.
Says more about academia, and the various modes of processing things (itself an academic area), than about what life has to offer.
Depths of Grokipedia #3: grokipedia.com/page/ley_bar...
Where to start? I find it ironic that, while I am engaged in a project to put the various baronetcies sharing a surname on separate pages, GP mimics enWP by making a compound page. With typically sententious editorial.
Would fail at AfC.
Apparently Google Books search is back again. Still gives the bloated "new look" URLs that obstruct using the in-book search. But the suffix &focus=searchwithinbook exists.
To state the obvious, it is a face-saving exercise by Musk. He can afford vanity projects - others not so much.
Another way: custom site search, e.g.
site:books.google.com "Henry VIII"
in google.com .