Join us for the LOVE REPLICATIONS WEEK from March 2 - 6 with talks on reproductions, replications, how to find them, how to conduct them, how to have them conducted on your study, where to publish them, and much more!
Join us for the LOVE REPLICATIONS WEEK from March 2 - 6 with talks on reproductions, replications, how to find them, how to conduct them, how to have them conducted on your study, where to publish them, and much more!
"Grassroots networks can help implement and harmonize open research efforts", by @agataboch.bsky.social, @tkalan.bsky.social, @maxkorbmacher.bsky.social, Lewend Mayiwar, @julienmayor.bsky.social & @dsquintana.bsky.social - doi.org/10.7557/11.8....
ISLE Online Forum 2025 Teaching with Impact: Linguistics in the Classroom Wednesday, 12 November 2025 | 6:00 PM CET (Berlin) Featured Presentations: Julia SchlΓΌter (University of Bamberg) Introducing KorPLUS KorPLUS is an open, interactive learning package designed to build corpus and AI literacy among non-native English-speaking language professionals. Through hands-on activities and real-world data, it empowers learners to engage critically with language data and emerging technologies. Katharina Deckert (University of Bamberg) Core Collaborator on KorPLUS Joining Julia to discuss the development and implementation of the project. Elen Le Foll (University of Cologne) Presenting: Data Analysis for the Language Sciences This open textbook, recognized with an Honourable Mention, offers an accessible and inclusive introduction to statistics and data visualization in R for students and researchers in the language sciences. Designed for diverse learners, it supports both standalone study and integration into blended learning environments. How can open educational resources make corpus linguistics more accessible? What role does data literacy play in empowering language professionals? How can digital tools support inclusive and innovative teaching in English linguistics? Event Details: Register & Learn More: https://www.isle-linguistics.org/events/outreach Revisit recordings of previous ISLE Online Forums on our YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/@isle2008
Join us next Wed 6 pm CET to talk about teaching linguistics, the creation of Open Educational Resources, and teaching innovations in higher education: https://uni-koeln.zoom.us/j/4799217418
#OpenEducation #OER #linguistics #HigherEd
Join our upcoming webinars βPeer Review and its Diversificationβ!
π
15-16 October 2025 on Zoom
π Registration: forms.gle/1R4Y3d33W8bQ...
π Full programme: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
#PeerReview #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025 #metasci #academicsky
My wonderful colleague Natalia Kartushina has a PhD opening to study the role of early accent exposure in children's cognitive and language development!
Don't miss it!
www.jobbnorge.no/en/available...
At the FORRT Replication Hub, our mission is to support researchers who want to replicate previous findings. We have now published a big new component with which we want to fulfill this mission: An open access handbook for reproduction and replication studies: forrt.org/replication_...
For those interested, here's our full preprint on the call for more transparent pilot study reporting: osf.io/preprints/ps...
@ihandleyminer.bsky.social #OpenScience #PilotStudies
"Don't seat the baby near the door" πΆ Thanks to @infantstudies.bsky.social for the chance to discuss our task force work on making pilot study insights more transparent to improve psyc science!
@agataboch.bsky.social #OpenScience #DevPsySky #PilotStudies #PsychScience #Transparency
As part of the Pilot Reporting Task Force, founded at @improvingpsych.org conference 2023, I would like to share a preprint with you: osf.io/preprints/ps.... We are looking for feedback on our perspective piece, promoting more transparency in the reporting of piloting in psychological science. 1/4
We are creating an academic journal and *you* can shape it!
Make comments and suggest changes to replicationresearch.org 's
- Constitution
- TOP guidelines
- article types
- and reviewer guidelines
until September 5 and be credited as a contributor: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
There is much enthusiasm, in principle, for adversarial collaborations (ACs), a scientific conflict resolution technique that encourages investigators with clashing models to collaborate in designing studies that test competing predictions. Adversarial collaborations offer the promise of breaking deadlocked debates, resolving disputes, and providing a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of a research domain. In practice, however, adversarial collaborations are more the exception than the rule, and there is almost no evidence on how scholars who have ventured into ACs assess the experience. To understand these perspectives, we surveyed and interviewed 29 scholars who participated in 13 AC projects. The data revealed that interpersonal conflicts were generally minor, that these projects required more upfront effort than typical collaborations, but benefited from high-quality results and more thoughtful post-publication debates. Rather than producing a clear βwinner,β the most common outcome was a deeper understanding of the problem space through the integration of opposing perspectives. Although the generalizability of these findings is limited by a sample consisting only of scholars who completed an AC, they nonetheless highlight the value of ACs as a tool for advancing scientific inquiry and offer practical guidance for scholars and journals exploring this approach.
29 scholars reflect on their participation in adversarial collaborations:
βRather than producing a clear 'winner,' the most common outcome was a deeper understanding of the problem space through the integration of opposing perspectivesβ
Open Access: doi.org/10.1007/s111...
#MetaSci #Methodology π§ͺ
Are you an early-career researcher (or someone hoping to help ECRs) working in #openscience or #metascience? The @reproducibilitea.org podcast is looking for guests for our next season of episodes! We'd love to feature ECR voices foremost β the next generation of scientists should be heard the most!
πToday, we look at a paper whose "authors examine reproducibility and replicability in qualitative research". According to the assessment, "both reviewers found the article to be technically sound, interesting, and of likely value to the field."
π Read the assessment, reviews & full text on MetaROR
"Science is not, and has never been, a neutral endeavour... the notion that researchers can or should cleanse themselves of bias is untenable, potentially intellectually dishonest, and ethically fraught."
New preprint with the (brilliant) Sarahanne Field #Metascience2025
osf.io/preprints/os...
If you are at #Metascience2025 and would like to hear more about other grassroots networks and their metascientific work, join our session today at 11:30
on the role of grassroots networks for reproducibility and reform (at SOAS S110) metascience.info/programme/#1...
Presenter on the stage pointing at a slide listing different open science initiatives and organizations in Africa
Are we doing #OpenScience just because everybody else is doing Open Science? Is it going to help us solve our local problems? How can metascience help? - thought-provoking questions from Emmanuel Boakye presenting African Reproducibility Network at #Metascience2025
How transparent is epidemiological secondary data research? How transparent could it be?
This was a project that originated in NORRNβs @norrepro.bsky.social metascientific work in collaboration with fantastic researchers at @uio.no and FHI in Norway π³π΄ Check out Timoβs thread below! ππ»
Experimentology cover: title and curves for distributions.
Experimentology is out today!!! A group of us wrote a free online textbook for experimental methods, available at experimentology.io - the idea was to integrate open science into all aspects of the experimental workflow from planning to design, analysis, and writing.
@luiseee.bsky.social presents fascinating data from the World Bank Reproducibilty Initiative
#MetaScience2025
reproducibility.worldbank.org/index.php/home
@metaror.bsky.social is a scholar-controlled peer review service for metascience research. Check us out! Metaror.org
#metascience2025 (I am an associate editor at MetaRoR) @ludowaltman.bsky.social @aidybarnett.bsky.social
Science minister Patrick Vallance has warned that βcuriosity-drivenβ research is one of the βeasiestβ areas for governments to cut, but stressed it must be βprotected and grownβ alongside improving the UKβs applied research base
#Metascience2025
www.timeshighereducation.com/news/basic-r...
Thank you so much for an incredible closing panel discussion. It was an honor to moderate it. @lspitzer.bsky.social @leesplez.bsky.social @martonkovacs.bsky.social @agataboch.bsky.social A. Sarafoglou
One Q. we discussed: How can ECRs contribute to protecting academic freedom? Thoughts? #SIPS2025
Always down for more analog conference sessions. Thanks to all our hackathon attendees for a super productive session - - looking forward to more testing of our pilot reporting templates!
#SIPS2025
#OpenScience lobbyists, skeptics and everything in between: consider coming to Munich in May 2026 (gorgeous time to visit..) to discuss the future of Open Research!
FOR2026 is open for submissions: opensciencestudies.eu/for-2026-con... pls help spread the word π #philsci #sts #methods #policy π§ͺ
Auditorium room with the audience photographed from the back, the speaker on the stand and slides displayed on the projector screen
Presidential address from @priyasilverstein.com at #SIPS2025: βImproving psychological science is hardβ
It is, but SIPS is also the best community I could ever imagine to work on that improvement with π₯Ή Join and support! ππ» improvingpsych.org
This is genuinely wild
We're back, with a fresh new lineup of talks and workshops!
Get your place while you still can to learn about how to make your research more robust and how to deal with scientific fraud!
This event is free and open to all: tinyurl.com/3ewaduvm
National symposium on Responsible Open Science June 16th, 2025, 09:00 β 15:30 CET Morning: Β§ Responsible Open Science: presentation of the ROSiE guidelines Β§ Keynotes on Ethical and epistemic responsibility: trust, integrity, and knowledge diversity Afternoon: Β§ Panel on Social and existential responsibility: fairness, inclusivity, AI, and big data Β§ Co-creation of national recommendations for Responsible Open Science More information and registration: https://nettskjema.no/a/514733 The event is hybrid with online sessions and possibility to participate in-person in Oslo, Bergen and TromsΓΈ.
We're very pleased to announce that the theme for this year's NORRN annual meeting will be "Responsible Open Science".
This event will be held in person (Oslo, Bergen and TromsΓΈ) and online on June 16th. Register for the event here: nettskjema.no/a/514733#/pa...
Some really interesting presentations coming up at the Metascience 2025 conference in late June early July. Here's four that take a step back to consider the discipline of metascience, question some of its assumptions, and reimagine its approach...
RoRI partner βͺ@fwf-at.bsky.socialβ¬ released a new study exploring how basic research, when free from immediate commercial pressures, can still generate powerful economic and social returns.
The key message for policymakers? Donβt constrain curiosity-driven research: www.fwf.ac.at/en/news/deta...