Succinct and a very interesting open access book on atheist pamphleteering in the United States: "Godless Polemics" (2026) by Florian Zappe. www.routledge.com/Godless-Pole...
@teemutaira
Senior Lecturer in the Study of Religion. Researching public discourses on religion; atheism and nonreligion; religion and news media; methodology. Author of Taking "Religion" Seriously (2022) and other books. https://teemutaira.wordpress.com
Succinct and a very interesting open access book on atheist pamphleteering in the United States: "Godless Polemics" (2026) by Florian Zappe. www.routledge.com/Godless-Pole...
For me, this is probably the most important programmatic texts in the study of religion in the 2000s. A short piece by Tomoko Masuzawa, published in Culture and Religion (1/2000). It is not that widely read, perhaps because it was published as part of a review symposium.
I am working on this slowly, but I wonder if someone writes about religion in Love Is Blind (all countries, all seasons) before me. A new USA season is available.
Two important Deleuze-scholars (Charles Stivale & Daniel Smith) talking about D's recently translated 1981 seminar on painting and other D-related matters. Quite a deep dive. newbooksnetwork.com/on-painting
Joking about what? Supporting nicely executed academic research about international franchise product is certainly different from supporting the representations of gender and race the product contains.
My contribution to this topic was published seven years ago. Open access: jrfm.eu/index.php/oj...
The postman brought miscellaneous Brill publications.
Contributorβs copy arrived. Itβs still exciting, after all these years.
One of my favourite intellectuals still publishing books at the age of 78.
And here's Humanists UK summarizing key issues and critical contributions re "Christian revival" humanists.uk/2026/01/28/g...
The debate on "Christian revival" continues. This piece by Conrad Hackett www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
I haven't contributed to this, but I will write a promotional endorsement. This should be out later this year.
Most likely "come as you are", as in Finland.
More Zizek to the shelf. Some of these are essays on current affairs (politics and other matters), and I like that part of his writing quite a bit.
Here "critical" means mostly lived religion (i.e. not highlighting texts but what people do). For some, any approach worth the name "critical" means at least problematizing our key term, religion. I gravitate towards the latter, but some contributions in this volume are still useful.
Here's the link (not OA): www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1...
This is what scholars want to see: other scholars being inspired by their work and taking it further. This is much more valuable than nice words (although I don't mind someone writing something kind). This is from Yosr ben Slima's "Leaving Islam in the Digital Age" (2025) (see the link in comments)
Just putting this here, 'cos the story contains links to several relevant surveys regarding atheism and nonreligion dallasexpress.com/lifestyle/su...
Just got an email saying that The Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics in Europe (eds by Fokas & Giorgi) has been published. 31 chapters, one of them cowritten by me. www.routledge.com/The-Routledg...
to be published here www.bloomsbury.com/uk/practical...
New day and a new piece for proofreading. Here's how this chapter begins ("Religionization of Minorities and Culturalization of Christianity: How to Study Boundary-Cases?").
Kind of. Although this anecdote is not about me and my work in the end. It continues from here and it is about Russell McCutcheon (as is the volume in which the piece will be published).
It is going to be published here equinoxreligionlibrary.com/projects/pol...
Proofreading. This chapter begins with an anecdote.
Not really, as far as I can tell. I think that it is more a combination of respect (it is disrespectful to explain one's experiences by something else) and the "location" of religion (the core or essence of religion is in the experiences Γ‘ la William James and Protestant traditition).
That can be a factor, but we teach social scientific approaches from the day one, so I tend to think that the issue here is how people learn to think about religion before they go to the university. It takes time to "unlearn".
Most UG students think that the point of study of religion is to examine deep individual experiences. They think that the danger of theories & methods is that we'll be distanced from such experiences. After graduation, some will think differently. But only some.
Food for thought for those interested in the (institutional) future(s) of the study of religion. An interview based on Russell T. McCutcheon's "Our Primary Expertise". newbooksnetwork.com/our-primary-...
Another way of saying, "we are closing programmes and probably sacking some scholars".
Lancaster Uni rhetoric sounds fake to me: "To ensure our Gold-standard teaching develops with the needs of our students, we constantly review [..] our curriculum [..]. As part of this ongoing review, our Global Religions BA courses will not be running in 2026." www.lancaster.ac.uk/study/underg...