Payvand Ahdout's Avatar

Payvand Ahdout

@payvandahdout

Associate Professor at UVA Law writing (mostly) about federal courts and constitutional law

319
Followers
205
Following
36
Posts
29.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Payvand Ahdout @payvandahdout

Preview
Larsen & McSweeney Medieval Treatises Alli Orr Larsen (William & Mary Law School) & Thomas McSweeney (William & Mary Law School) have posted Medieval Treatises and the Judicial Search for a Useable Past on SSRN. Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent turn to history and tradition has prompted a renewed interest in the far distant past – the laws and customs of the Middle Ages.

Larsen & McSweeney Medieval Treatises

Alli Orr Larsen (William & Mary Law School) & Thomas McSweeney (William & Mary Law School) have posted Medieval Treatises and the Judicial Search for a Useable Past on SSRN. Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent turn to history and tradition has…

27.02.2026 20:25 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 4

I got to talk with @lawfaremedia.org and @rparloff.bsky.social about the subject of my article, Patronage Pardons (Duke LJ), which explains how Trump uses pardons to power a loyalty for protection racket.

Podcast: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lawf...

Article: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

27.02.2026 15:55 👍 30 🔁 11 💬 3 📌 1
Book Talk: Law and Technology with Ryan Calo and Danielle Citron

Very excited for this. blog.archive.org/event/book-t...

25.02.2026 05:55 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Lawfare Hard National Security Choices

The great folks at Lawfare have published my views on the implications of Learning Resources, the tariffs case. More later on my substack.
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lear...

24.02.2026 15:43 👍 5 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0

Very pleased to report that our Article, "Untangling AI Liability," co-authored with the great Cathy Sharkey of NYU Law School, will be published in the California Law Review. For those with access, you can find it on SSRN here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

23.02.2026 16:56 👍 7 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0

Anything else big happen in separation of powers law today?

20.02.2026 16:29 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

Robynn Cox and I have a new paper! It's about the history of predictive algorithms in criminal justice, back in the 1920s-1950s. This paper is the result of five years of research and we're so happy to see it out. 🧵 1/

13.02.2026 14:39 👍 59 🔁 26 💬 2 📌 1
Leveraging Trust Law to Protect Child Influencers - Trusts & Estates Naomi Cahn, Trusting Remedies for the Child Influencer Space: Blocked Trust Accounts and Child Beneficiaries, 17 Drexel L. Rev. 971 (2025).Victoria J. HanemanProfessor Naomi Cahn’s recent article, Tru...

A paper from Prof. @naomicahn.bsky.social shows how the law often lags behind the development of new technologies, according to @universityofga.bsky.social Prof. Victoria J. Haneman. @taxlawprof.bsky.social @jotwell.bsky.social

13.02.2026 14:47 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
As constitutional interpretation becomes rooted ever more deeply into the past the Constitution seemingly has less and less to say about our present. It seems to offer little principled direction for navigating what many describe as a constitutional crisis. On questions ranging from birthright citizenship and territorial acquisition to aggressive federal immigration enforcement, executive intervention beyond U.S. borders, and the “history and tradition” of annexed territories such as Hawai’i, the Constitution’s familiar sources of authority and traditional narratives seem to falter. These domains appear to tread into empty constitutional landscapes and newly discovered territory.  
Scholars have increasingly traced this backward-looking orientation to conservative legal movements of the last half century. But the impulse to seek constitutional meaning in the past is not new. Long before the Supreme Court embraced originalism, and long before the modern turn to “history and tradition,” jurists and scholars assumed that the Constitution could not be understood apart from its origins and development. Constitutional meaning was thought to emerge from historical inquiry. The question, then, was not whether constitutional interpretation should engage with the past, but which past—and through what historical method. 
This Foreword argues that our present constitutional impasse stems, at least in part, not solely from excessive attention to the past but from fixation on a particular kind of past. Modern constitutional theory, I suggest, has been increasingly bounded by what scholars in the historical and social sciences call a methodological nationalism. By nationalism, I do not mean to invoke familiar federalism debates. Nor do I use the term nationalism as a pejorative or a critique of those whose research centers the United States and its founders. 
Rather, in identifying mainstream constitutional theory as operating within a nationalist frame, I seek to draw attention t…

As constitutional interpretation becomes rooted ever more deeply into the past the Constitution seemingly has less and less to say about our present. It seems to offer little principled direction for navigating what many describe as a constitutional crisis. On questions ranging from birthright citizenship and territorial acquisition to aggressive federal immigration enforcement, executive intervention beyond U.S. borders, and the “history and tradition” of annexed territories such as Hawai’i, the Constitution’s familiar sources of authority and traditional narratives seem to falter. These domains appear to tread into empty constitutional landscapes and newly discovered territory. Scholars have increasingly traced this backward-looking orientation to conservative legal movements of the last half century. But the impulse to seek constitutional meaning in the past is not new. Long before the Supreme Court embraced originalism, and long before the modern turn to “history and tradition,” jurists and scholars assumed that the Constitution could not be understood apart from its origins and development. Constitutional meaning was thought to emerge from historical inquiry. The question, then, was not whether constitutional interpretation should engage with the past, but which past—and through what historical method. This Foreword argues that our present constitutional impasse stems, at least in part, not solely from excessive attention to the past but from fixation on a particular kind of past. Modern constitutional theory, I suggest, has been increasingly bounded by what scholars in the historical and social sciences call a methodological nationalism. By nationalism, I do not mean to invoke familiar federalism debates. Nor do I use the term nationalism as a pejorative or a critique of those whose research centers the United States and its founders. Rather, in identifying mainstream constitutional theory as operating within a nationalist frame, I seek to draw attention t…

Post image

New Foreword up on SSRN, previewing new projects on the history of constitutional history and what it can teach about legal frameworks at the heart of our "constitutional crisis"-federal Indian law, territorial law, expansion, immigration, and executive power. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

13.02.2026 15:10 👍 47 🔁 20 💬 2 📌 0

My latest article with the one and only @spenceroverton.bsky.social called “Digital Ethnonationalism” forthcoming in University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Here is the papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

10.02.2026 00:32 👍 45 🔁 16 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

My paper, Patronage Pardons, is forthcoming in the Duke Law Journal.

This has appeared in popular press, but here is the full dress version. What distinguishes Trumpist clemency corruption is its communicative function - it powers a loyalty for protection racket.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

10.02.2026 14:52 👍 87 🔁 36 💬 0 📌 2

For more on how electoral cycles interact with efforts to address contempt of congress, check out Political Mootness on SSRN: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

10.02.2026 15:03 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Justice Department seeks to wipe out Bannon conviction for defying Jan. 6 committee Bannon already served a four-month prison sentence in 2024 for his conviction on the charges.

Political Mootness in the real world: www.politico.com/news/2026/02...

10.02.2026 15:03 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

Thank you, @lsolum.bsky.social!

04.02.2026 14:01 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

We finally know what happened to DOJ's (frivolous) misconduct complaint against Chief Judge Boasberg:

It was transferred by Chief Justice Roberts from the D.C. Circuit to Sixth Circuit Chief Judge Jeff Sutton, and Sutton dismissed it in a ... direct ... memorandum and order just two weeks later:

31.01.2026 20:01 👍 4032 🔁 1138 💬 61 📌 52
Preview
Is the GAO the Next Battlefield in the Fight for Separation of Powers? The expiration of the comptroller general’s term is an opportunity for Congress to reassert itself, or retreat further.

Hugely important piece by @mblawrence.bsky.social on the future of GAO and why you should care. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/is-t...

23.01.2026 13:14 👍 56 🔁 28 💬 1 📌 12
"The spirit of this place — which is communal, ambitious, purpose-driven, and joyful in equal measure — has given me the strength to confront new challenges, learn, and evolve. I would choose this school over and over again." Courtney Douglas '25

"The spirit of this place — which is communal, ambitious, purpose-driven, and joyful in equal measure — has given me the strength to confront new challenges, learn, and evolve. I would choose this school over and over again." Courtney Douglas '25

#UVALaw is No. 1 in Best Quality of Life for law schools. Recent graduates discuss why. at.virginia.edu/2zasEVV

16.01.2026 15:24 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Payvand Ahdout, Leslie Kendrick and Rachel Bayefsky

Payvand Ahdout, Leslie Kendrick and Rachel Bayefsky

Dean Leslie Kendrick ’06 joined the awards ceremony recognizing Profs. @payvandahdout.bsky.social and @rachelbayefsky.bsky.social for their research in civil procedure at @theaals.bsky.social annual meeting Wednesday.

07.01.2026 21:06 👍 6 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
A Conspicuous Gap May Undermine Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Plan

www.nytimes.com/2025/12/22/u...

05.01.2026 17:32 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

No one can see “what types of ideas you’re communicating” just by looking at the syllabus b/c they don’t get the classroom discussion & full context. I often assign readings that have been influential that I think are completely wrong. Putting it on the syllabus is not an endorsement of the ideas

29.12.2025 15:09 👍 54 🔁 10 💬 3 📌 1
Preview
Professors Recognized by AALS for Civil Procedure Research Professor Rachel Bayefsky of the University of Virginia School of Law has won the Association of American Law Schools’ Junior Scholarship Award for her scholarship in civil procedure. Professor Payvan...

.@TheAALS has recognized Profs. Rachel Bayefsky and Payvand Ahdout for their scholarship in civil procedure. @payvandahdout.bsky.social @rachelbayefsky.bsky.social www.law.virginia.edu/news/202512/...

08.12.2025 14:38 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Professors Recognized by AALS for Civil Procedure Research Professor Rachel Bayefsky of the University of Virginia School of Law has won the Association of American Law Schools’ Junior Scholarship Award for her scholarship in civil procedure. Professor Payvan...

Prof. @rachelbayefsky.bsky.social has won @theaals.bsky.social Junior Scholarship Award for her article “Judicial Institutionalism.” Prof. @payvandahdout.bsky.social earned an honorable mention.

01.12.2025 17:22 👍 9 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 1
Rethinking Youth Privacy - Virginia Law Review Congress and state legislatures are showing renewed interest in youth privacy, proposing myriad new laws to address data extraction, addiction, manipulation, and more. Almost all of their proposals, a...

virginialawreview.org/articles/ret... our latest is out! @ariezra.bsky.social and I on “Rethinking Youth Privacy”

21.11.2025 01:07 👍 27 🔁 9 💬 1 📌 2
Preview
Protect Democracy - Jobs Protect Democracy is a nonpartisan, nonprofit group working to prevent authoritarianism. We are hiring for several open positions - join us!

We're hiring for the following positions:
✔️ Chief Impact Officer: $290-$345k
✔️ Major Gifts Officer: $84-$94k
✔️ Legislative & Advocacy Specialist: $84-$94k
✔️ IT Specialist $112-$125k
✔️ Contract Full-Stack and Data Engineers $150 - $225 per hour

For details, visit:

18.11.2025 19:12 👍 20 🔁 12 💬 0 📌 0
Leslie Kendrick and Risa Goluboff unveil portrait

Leslie Kendrick and Risa Goluboff unveil portrait

Risa Goluboff speaks next to portrait

Risa Goluboff speaks next to portrait

Paul Mahoney, Leslie Kendrick, Risa Goluboff and John C. Jeffries Jr.

Paul Mahoney, Leslie Kendrick, Risa Goluboff and John C. Jeffries Jr.

Leslie Kendrick and Risa Goluboff stand with portrait and alumni

Leslie Kendrick and Risa Goluboff stand with portrait and alumni

The #UVALaw and #UVA community came together Friday to honor former Dean Risa Goluboff at a ceremony unveiling her portrait, which is now hanging in Clay Hall.

13.11.2025 15:08 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1

Grateful to my amazing colleagues at @uvalaw.bsky.social for the whole ride getting to this point. For the advice, listening, and most importantly, friendship.

11.11.2025 23:24 👍 27 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0
Preview
To a Conservative Warren Court - Harvard Law Review The Warren Court’s legacy is ubiquitous. With the eponymous Chief Justice Warren at the helm, the Supreme Court featured a strong majority of left-of-center jurists, and those “liberal lions” ruled (o...

Thank you to the editors of the Harvard Law Review and to many commentators.

harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...

11.11.2025 12:06 👍 28 🔁 10 💬 1 📌 0
Promotional poster for Datapalooza 2025 featuring keynote speaker Danielle Citron.

Promotional poster for Datapalooza 2025 featuring keynote speaker Danielle Citron.

Keynote speaker and UVA Law professor Danielle Citron joins the UVA School of Data Science for Datapalooza 2025: Truth and Accountability in the Age of AI on Friday, November 14.

To learn more and register for this event, click here: https://bit.ly/3WQE3Go

10.11.2025 19:18 👍 4 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Structure of Religious Preference - Harvard Law Review A revolution has occurred in the law of religious freedom. At this point, the picture is reasonably clear. The Supreme Court has greatly expanded the scope of the Free Exercise Clause.

The Supreme Court had three religious freedom cases last Term. With @richschragger.bsky.social and @nelsontebbe.bsky.social, our latest comments on them, extending our analysis of religious preferentialism under the First Amendment.

harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...

11.11.2025 01:48 👍 28 🔁 17 💬 2 📌 1