You probably meant ~16, not ~16K.
23.02.2026 01:36
👍 7
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
You probably meant ~16, not ~16K.
The Chief really went after the principal dissent[er]. E.g., 16 (“Government, echoed point-for-point by the principal dissent”), 16 n.4 (“principal dissent surmises” about “hypothetical cases not before us”), 20 n.6 (language in prior case “should have sufficed to dissuade the principal dissent”).
Ok, so _two_ people have called you out on this post and you’re still not deleting it?
Well, then. I’ll draw appropriate conclusions about your reliability.
As for Tre45on, I’ve been trying to hold him accountable since 2021.
Milcon approps might want a word.
The lack of any other antecedent for “he” means you are accusing Raskin of a crime, which (if false) is defamation.
Suggest rephrasing.
Haven’t read the article, so maybe the title makes a deep point that the article explains.
But isn‘t “highest ebb” an oxymoron?
Also the “SHALL remain operable” in 4.
He tried. He’s losing in the courts.
thehill.com/policy/trans...
Why did he put it this way?
“I suppose I could have?”
No, he couldn’t have done that.
And Tre45on can’t either.
Janet Mills is 78 years old.
It’s time for a new generation that can serve Maine for decades in the Senate, where seniority is critical.
Perhaps if Mills had declined to run, other candidates would have stepped forward.
SCOTUS just announced three opinion days, all at once.
Don‘t think I’ve seen that before.
It’s as though there was a conference today.
“The Court may announce opinions on Friday, February 20, Tuesday, February 24, and Wednesday, February 25.”
Horse to water.
What about the $75 billion in BBBA funding? Perhaps Dems are holding another Sanders amendment in reserve? Every day that goes by shows the need for that $75B to be repealed & to keep DHS subject to annual approps.
Reminiscent of Justice Frankfurter’s point in Chenery: “To say a man is a fiduciary only begins the analysis.”
Perhaps Justice Roberts had similar qualms to yours.
Which might explain the move from fiduciary to contract.
As for making no sense, the NYT quotes language from the clerks’ code of conduct that seems to include basic fiduciary duties. The word “loyalty,” in particular, seems to refer to the fiduciary duty of loyalty. I’ve litigated fiduciary-duty claims, so all this rings a bell.
Or to the public. See Justice Alito in Percoco: “An “agent owes a fiduciary obligation to the princi-
pal,” see, e.g., 1 Restatement (Third) of Agency §1.01, Comment e, p. 23 (2005)… therefore an agent of the government has a fiduciary duty to the government and thus to the public it serves.”
It was also a few weeks after Trump was re-elected.
Two possible correlations….
Article says “Clerks and members of the court’s support staff.”
Printers and secretaries would have access to sensitive, non-public, sometimes market-moving information.
The fiduciary duty is owed to the employer.
fhnylaw.com/court-holds-...
This isn’t that hard.
It moves the duty from fiduciary to contract.
Perhaps Roberts realized that fiduciaries have duties of candor and disclosure to beneficiaries.
The real question is, why in late 2024?
Americans might have wanted to adjust their private lives accordingly, months ahead of time.
Whoever leaked the draft fulfilled a trustee’s duty to disclose.
but to the American people. And among them is a duty to disclose information to the beneficiaries.
Millions of Americans needed to know about the Dobbs decision. Abortion would soon become far less available.
To wit:
So Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. thinks the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization leak was a “betrayal of trust”? Let’s meet him on his own terms. If Supreme Court justices are trustees, then the duties they owe are not to each other, or to the court,
No—for reasons that I explained in a letter to the editor that WaPo published. www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
If people immigrate, are they then on the inside?
No?
Why not, exactly?
i thought one applies the law to the facts, not the other way around.
You mean that Trump now wants to close the performing-arts center he tried to rename after himself?
#ETTD
Oh, so federal courthouses are under the capo’s “protection”?
She should speak in public more.
Would remind everyone that she’s an immigrant.
Unlikely given federal courts’ inherent power to protect the integrity of their proceedings.
Unless, of course, Judge Cannon is presiding.
Before denouncing Schumer, we might want to see the list of amendments that will be considered before the Senate passes the 5-bus.