Kae The Corsair Queen

that's not a fact. that is SPECULATION.

that is fundamentally NOT a fact, actually.

Case in point, no one has said they're mad because Hilary raped young people, because that didn't happen. People are mad at her for supporting her horrendous rapist husband & shielding him as best she can from him seeing accountability.

No but we hold spouses accountable for continuing to support (and thereby serve to shield them from accountability) the monstrous actions of their partners. Because those are THEIR actions, not those of their spouses.

But she probably did. LOL

Your level of certainty given the plausibility that she in fact did is baffling.

I assume you weren't personally there to know and be so sure.

So either you need to believe cause being a Clinton partisan is part of your identity or this is just costly signalling.

You're dying in a very weird hill.

First of all, yes she did. The evidence for her is less overtly damning, but it isn't nonexistent.

The weaker specific evidence in the context of the evidence for her husband gains new strength.

Second of all: why are you defending that horrible person?

In this case we have a war criminal married to a rapist.

And she continued married with and supportive of said rapist after knowing of everything, so that both could continue benefit economically and politically of the situation.

So, given the material conditions, in that particular case, yes.

I apply this logic to men all the time. Who is not applying this logic? Where? Is it Republicans or reactionaries who hate women or something?

Why are the rest of us responsible for them?

This is quite the strawman you've constructed so that Hillary can never be blamed for her own actions.

Yes. Especially if they stay with them forever afterward while clearly knowing all about it.

Why is this even a question?

yeah, mate. yeah it would.

if your wife associates with child sex traffickers and you find out about it and you stay together, yeah

Her husband was associated with him from head to toe. Do you really believe that? You have to be so fucking gullible to believe that.

There are photos of her husband in Epstein's property, sharing a hot tub with a person identified as a victim of sex trafficking dude.

This is not Dems x Reps.

This is not a normal couple dude. This is a former president a a former secretary of state.

They are a political brand. Do you really believe he could maintain a notorious and deep relationship with that guy without her endorsement?

There's evidence for her too, it's just less overtly obvious.

Say do you know what Blackwater is you old bean? Tattoo boy worked for it!

It’s time we started assuming people in combat units are also nazis

imagine saying you've studied something for twenty years and you couldn't recognize one of the most common symbols from what you studied.

I would be incredibly embarrassed if I’d studied WW2 for years and didn’t recognize that specific very obvious and hard to miss Nazi symbol. Definitely too embarrassed to say it loudly and publicly but I ain’t this guy.

Anyone who has to say they "studied WWII for years" just used to watch the History Channel.

If you don't recognize one of the most prominent symbols from Nazi Germany, you didn't study shit.

Clearly none of your WWII books had any illustrations.

guys who "study WWII" remain one of historys greatest strain of Men Who Tell On Themselves

"I too was an incurious dingus!" is not a stellar defense of people with that hobby

Don’t worry about Planter having a Nazi tattoo at 20, that’s a right wing distraction. Oh, what’s that? He’s currently reposting neonzais on a website owned by a Nazi? www.pressherald.com/2026/02/26/g...

The Nazi totenkopf is instantly recognized by anybody because there is historical photographic evidence and its use in popular movies like “Schindler’s List” reinforces this fact. Ignorance is never an excuse.

This is what he had on his chest. You say you study WWII and you didn’t know that?

Admitting to not having retained any of the knowledge that you’ve studied for years is so fucking funny

he kept it well after sobering up and learning what it meant. he didn't only find out last year, he'd known for years and called it by its name.

also if you've studied world war 2 and don't recognize that symbol i'm sorry but you're not very good at studying.

Do we think the Guardian would refer to Israeli bunkers ("air raid shelters") as "underground lairs"?

Headline: Video: IDF footage claims IDF claims to show air strikes on Khamenei’s underground bunker Body: The Israeli military released a video purportedly showing its fighter jets dropping bombs at the underground bunker of the slain Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Israel claimed the underground lair in Tehran is still being used by senior Iranian officials. There has been no comment from Iran or reports of any casualties from either side. [The words the underground lair are highlighted].

Objective, neutral coverage from Britain's most liberal newspaper.

How do you think "And sometimes the call is made to attack where there are civilians because it’s also a legitimate military target." is not justifying the killing of civilians?

bsky.app/profile/jade...

May what you excuse happen to Iranian children happen to you.