Yes, of course. I think the balance of the evidence suggests he is (or at least was) an authentic nazi and I would still vote for him over Susan Collins because he is more likely to support a Democrat for senate majority leader.

Fetterman is a best case scenario (and vastly better than Collins). The downside risk is that he’s Tulsi Gabbard.

Yes, along with women and gays. For his supporters, Platner’s Nazi tattoo is actually a *plus* because they know he is authentic and committed to their cause.

I interpreted that statement as a culture built by English and Scots-Irish, not a shared culture between the British isles. I think it was purposefully exclusionary towards Gaelic Irish.

Yes, of course. Parents do not have the right to murder their children by omission.

If any aspect of television is to blame it is reality tv both literally (no Apprentice means Trump never becomes president) and more generally a decline in the culture.

There is also the ACW of the history books (Bull Run, Gettysburg, etc.) and the ACW that took place between townsfolk and neighbors. The later history is not as well known but very real.

Yes, it should be law professors. They did write the Napoleonic Code and many other important legal frameworks.

Man he lost by millions of votes. The GOP had been out-of-step with their base on immigration for decades while Dem primary voters thought Barack Obama did a good job and wanted to stay the course.

You are very likely more Anglo than the actual British Royal family!

I’m confused - what benefit could there possibly be to allowing members to endorse against the party’s candidate for governor?

The man on the street in Britain is genuinely an antisemite in a way that antisemitism has never really existed in the US. My mother grew up in 1970s London where her family’s flat was known as Jew’s Corner and adults would tell their children to stay away from them because they were Jews.

This framing is a lie. The GOP is further eroding democracy and the Democrats have announced they will respond to the GOP’s escalation.

It’s the same coalitions as the French Revolution, and it’s the same coalitions as Guelphs and Ghibellines. These are the most natural political coalitions in history, and they essentially trace back to the advent of settled agriculture and the permanent communities that came with it.

It's not that bizarre because the people in question prefer it when Democrats lose. Whether this be the result of a sincere but badly misguided belief in accelerationism, or because of (hidden) nativism or (not so hidden) misogyny, probably depends on the specific person.