Fred Varn's Avatar

Fred Varn

@fsvarn

Assistant Professor at The Jackson Laboratory studying brain tumors and their microenvironment

138
Followers
138
Following
7
Posts
22.10.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Fred Varn @fsvarn

@eunhee-yi.bsky.social congrats!!!

05.11.2025 14:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Find the River

05.10.2025 12:22 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Cuyahoga

28.07.2025 19:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Green Grow the Rushes

10.06.2025 14:06 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

β€œI think people should know that research that they probably would support is being canceled,” said Eden Tanner, a chemist at the University of Mississippi... "β€œI would like to cure brain cancer,” Dr. Tanner said. β€œI think that's not particularly controversial.”

04.06.2025 16:56 πŸ‘ 420 πŸ” 177 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 1

My quote of the day

Instead of cursing the darkness, light a candle for where we're going. There's something ahead worth fighting for.

Neil Young

03.06.2025 11:25 πŸ‘ 76 πŸ” 17 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Could Hurt U.S. Economy, Study Shows (Gift Article) Reducing federal support for research and development could cause long-run economic damage and reduce government revenue.

β€œCutting federal funding for scientific research could cause long-run economic damage equivalent to a major recession.

A 50% reduction would lower GDP 7.6%. A 75% cut would reduce it 11.3% β€” a larger decline than in any recession since the Great Depression.

www.nytimes.com/2025/04/30/b...

30.04.2025 11:49 πŸ‘ 154 πŸ” 83 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 14
Graphic of Washington Post poll from April 18-22, 2025, showing "Majorities of Americans oppose various Trump proposals"

highlighting two lines in particular:
"Increasing the Federal Government's role in how private universities operate" - 28 percent support, 70 percent oppose
"Reducing federal funding for medical research" - 21 percent support, 77 percent oppose

Graphic of Washington Post poll from April 18-22, 2025, showing "Majorities of Americans oppose various Trump proposals" highlighting two lines in particular: "Increasing the Federal Government's role in how private universities operate" - 28 percent support, 70 percent oppose "Reducing federal funding for medical research" - 21 percent support, 77 percent oppose

University leaders need to understand: they are holding INCREDIBLY good cards.

It is so rare in today's polarized era to have the support of 70+ percent of the public against the Trump admiministration on anything. Universities have thatβ€”AND winning legal arguments.

27.04.2025 05:29 πŸ‘ 4425 πŸ” 1378 πŸ’¬ 47 πŸ“Œ 54

Perfect Circle

12.04.2025 13:08 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Harborcoat; So. Central Rain; Letter Never Sent

09.04.2025 13:19 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

As good a list as any

30.01.2025 17:18 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Are you affected by the Trump administration’s pauseΒ on health communications, science meetings, and reviews? Have you been affected by the Trump administration’s pauseΒ on communications, science meetings, and reviews? @statnews would like to hear from you.

Please repost! We’re trying hard to sort out rumors from truth + would like to hear from anyone affected by the new federal orders + NIH pause. Patients, scientists, health equity researchers: please contact us below. We won’t share anything without your permission. www.statnews.com/2025/01/25/t...

26.01.2025 17:01 πŸ‘ 608 πŸ” 611 πŸ’¬ 20 πŸ“Œ 20