Michael J. Kane's Avatar

Michael J. Kane

@michaeljkane

Posts: personal capacity. PSY/open science, working memory, attn, mindwandering (also edu; skepticism). Living well with #Tourette. (Also am/was ProfessorPowerPop on Xitter.) Art: Miles Johnston; Haring

4,737
Followers
2,676
Following
569
Posts
16.08.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Michael J. Kane @michaeljkane

Best news all day

09.03.2026 21:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Data Visualization A Practical Introduction

Hereโ€™s a full draft of the upcoming second edition of my โ€œData Visualization: A Practical Introductionโ€: socviz.co

05.03.2026 22:54 ๐Ÿ‘ 539 ๐Ÿ” 172 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 12 ๐Ÿ“Œ 15
Scanned black-and-white image of the first page of an academic journal article. At the top left it reads โ€œPsychological Bulletin, 1985, Vol. 97, No. 2, 286โ€“306.โ€ At the top right: โ€œCopyright 1985 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0033-2909/85/$00.75.โ€

Centered below is the title in large serif font: โ€œMuch Ado About the Full Moon: A Meta-Analysis of Lunar-Lunacy Research.โ€ The authors are listed beneath: โ€œJames Rotton, Florida International Universityโ€ and โ€œI. W. Kelly, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.โ€

The opening paragraph begins in large serif text: โ€œAs we have approached the topic in this review, research on lunar periodicities โ€˜is not pseudoscience in the usual sense. But it is certainly bad scienceโ€™ (Abell, 1979, p. 72).โ€ It continues by noting that reviews often conclude with recommendations for further research, but the authors state they will depart from that tradition. They explain that the articleโ€™s title indirectly references an earlier work on the null hypothesis (Wilson, Miller, & Lower, 1967) and conclude with the line expressing hope that it will be โ€œa โ€˜much adieu about the full moon.โ€™โ€

Scanned black-and-white image of the first page of an academic journal article. At the top left it reads โ€œPsychological Bulletin, 1985, Vol. 97, No. 2, 286โ€“306.โ€ At the top right: โ€œCopyright 1985 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0033-2909/85/$00.75.โ€ Centered below is the title in large serif font: โ€œMuch Ado About the Full Moon: A Meta-Analysis of Lunar-Lunacy Research.โ€ The authors are listed beneath: โ€œJames Rotton, Florida International Universityโ€ and โ€œI. W. Kelly, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.โ€ The opening paragraph begins in large serif text: โ€œAs we have approached the topic in this review, research on lunar periodicities โ€˜is not pseudoscience in the usual sense. But it is certainly bad scienceโ€™ (Abell, 1979, p. 72).โ€ It continues by noting that reviews often conclude with recommendations for further research, but the authors state they will depart from that tradition. They explain that the articleโ€™s title indirectly references an earlier work on the null hypothesis (Wilson, Miller, & Lower, 1967) and conclude with the line expressing hope that it will be โ€œa โ€˜much adieu about the full moon.โ€™โ€

The G.O.A.T in this regard:

04.03.2026 16:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Recently, van der Stigchel and colleagues posted a provocative commentary suggesting that we should be wary of bots in online behavioral data collection (๐Ÿงตby @cstrauch.bsky.social here: bsky.app/profile/cstr...). But should we? Here is my response letter osf.io/preprints/ps.... 1/5

04.03.2026 12:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 46 ๐Ÿ” 29 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
A line graph showing NSF grant awards made through 2/27/26 for fiscal year 2026 compared with grant awards for fiscal years 2021-2025 for the Directorate of STEM Education.

A line graph showing NSF grant awards made through 2/27/26 for fiscal year 2026 compared with grant awards for fiscal years 2021-2025 for the Directorate of STEM Education.

8/10

01.03.2026 14:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 67 ๐Ÿ” 17 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
A line graph showing NSF grant awards made through 2/27/26 for fiscal year 2026 compared with grant awards for fiscal years 2021-2025 for the Directorate of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.

A line graph showing NSF grant awards made through 2/27/26 for fiscal year 2026 compared with grant awards for fiscal years 2021-2025 for the Directorate of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.

7/10

01.03.2026 14:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 92 ๐Ÿ” 30 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 12

Generic white dude who programs
@westbynoreaster
Why then did you take down the โ€œEinsteinโ€ chatbot?
1:22 AM ยท Feb 26, 2026
ยท
67
 Views

Advait Paliwal
@advaitpaliwal
ยท
16h
Cease and desist
Generic white dude who programs
@westbynoreaster
ยท
15h
Really? Presumably from Canvas/Instructure, right?
Advait Paliwal
@advaitpaliwal
ยท
7h
Due to the name Einstein

Generic white dude who programs @westbynoreaster Why then did you take down the โ€œEinsteinโ€ chatbot? 1:22 AM ยท Feb 26, 2026 ยท 67 Views Advait Paliwal @advaitpaliwal ยท 16h Cease and desist Generic white dude who programs @westbynoreaster ยท 15h Really? Presumably from Canvas/Instructure, right? Advait Paliwal @advaitpaliwal ยท 7h Due to the name Einstein

In utterly DELIGHTFUL news, Adwait Paliwal, the desi techbro behind the cheatbot Einstein AI which claimed it could log into Canvas and do/turn in your assignments for you has been forced to take down his website.
He'll likely be back, and there are others like him in abundance, sadly.

26.02.2026 23:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 524 ๐Ÿ” 148 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 21 ๐Ÿ“Œ 28
Feynman โ€” AI Grading & Teaching Assistant for Professors

"Your h-index will thank you" ๐Ÿ˜‚ The professor's answer to students using Einstein has arrived www.professorfeynman.com

26.02.2026 16:22 ๐Ÿ‘ 13 ๐Ÿ” 8 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Amplifiers of Epistemic Posture Essays and writing on AI

I'm a cognitive scientist with an interest in epistemic vigilance, and this essay that's been going around gave me pause.

I don't think it's straightforward to apply the concept of epistemic vigilance to interactions with LLMs, as this essay does.

๐Ÿงต/

sbgeoaiphd.github.io/rotating_the...

26.02.2026 13:18 ๐Ÿ‘ 290 ๐Ÿ” 121 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8 ๐Ÿ“Œ 33

No, turning over activities designed for your learning to a bot does not free you.

Undermining online learning hurts access to learning, especially for the not-wealthy.

Had a great discussion with @mjgault.bsky.social of @404media.co about Einstein and other online course autocomplete systems.

25.02.2026 18:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 146 ๐Ÿ” 39 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
The vast majority of college students arenโ€™t attending Ivy League schools, theyโ€™re grinding away at night classes in community colleges across the country. Distance and online learning has been an enormous boon for those students. โ€œIf thereโ€™s no credibility to that, then youโ€™ve just ruined the investment and the learning goals and the access to meaningful learning that that they can then also use for employment of students who are underprivileged, who canโ€™t come to the classroom, who are working full time and raising families and trying to get an education,โ€ Mills said.

The vast majority of college students arenโ€™t attending Ivy League schools, theyโ€™re grinding away at night classes in community colleges across the country. Distance and online learning has been an enormous boon for those students. โ€œIf thereโ€™s no credibility to that, then youโ€™ve just ruined the investment and the learning goals and the access to meaningful learning that that they can then also use for employment of students who are underprivileged, who canโ€™t come to the classroom, who are working full time and raising families and trying to get an education,โ€ Mills said.

This is really important (via @annamillsoer.bsky.social ): the effect of AI/LLM cheating on online teaching will have real effects on the opportunity that many working-class people have to study college material. If these degrees become worthless b/c of rampant cheating we lose a real resource.

25.02.2026 20:03 ๐Ÿ‘ 33 ๐Ÿ” 13 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Einstein - AI Homework Agent Einstein logs into Canvas and does your homework automatically. He has his own computer โ€” he can watch lectures, read essays, write papers, and participate in discussions.

Is this bad

23.02.2026 15:06 ๐Ÿ‘ 1413 ๐Ÿ” 328 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 159 ๐Ÿ“Œ 613

Out of nowhere, an overwhelming craving for chef boyardee mini ravioli, cold, straight out of the can.

21.02.2026 22:10 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Youโ€™ve been beaten to it: Google โ€œbrownie pan all edgesโ€ & youโ€™ll see several varieties. :)

21.02.2026 20:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Given that they pitch corrected Freddie Mercury (!) in their recent remix of their debut album, I'd stay away from sets like this until a lack of shenanigans can be confirmed.

19.02.2026 16:38 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thanks for doing this work. I was leaning in this direction before, but now I'm sure that my lab will be taking an extended break from online/Prolific studies.

19.02.2026 16:27 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Would bots be able to simulate human behavior regarding Posner-type experimental effects if the nature of the study wasn't known beforehand? Curious about the suspected bots' experimental effects. (And, in general, thanks for addressing my questions.)

19.02.2026 14:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Very interesting and concerning. How many suspected bots did you identify (you say "several")? What did the suspected bots show with respect to the experimental effects of interest? Is it realistic that bots have been created to demonstrate (for eg) autocorrelation but not right-skewed Q-Qs?

19.02.2026 13:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Recent work has shown how vulnerable online survey research is to LLMs. Motivated by this, we examined our online Posner cueing data from Prolific. It's concerning. We now must carefully consider when (or whether?) online behavioral data can be trusted.
see our comment:
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

19.02.2026 12:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 76 ๐Ÿ” 34 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6 ๐Ÿ“Œ 4
Two rulers, unalike in measurements

Two rulers, unalike in measurements

They released this like this

Why would anyone ever drive a car by people who do not Look At MEASUREMENTS

17.02.2026 10:25 ๐Ÿ‘ 478 ๐Ÿ” 144 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 42 ๐Ÿ“Œ 69

The book of love is long and boring
No one can lift the damn thing
It's full of charts and facts and figures
And instructions for dancing
And I
I love it when you read to me
And you
You can read me anything

15.02.2026 02:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And I could make you rue the day But I could never make you stay
Not for all the tea in China
Not if I could sing like a bird
Not for all North Carolina
Not for all my little words
Not if I could write for you
The sweetest song you ever heard
It doesn't matter what I do
Not for all my little words

15.02.2026 02:19 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Happy birthday to one of my favourite haters, Charles Darwin

12.02.2026 16:31 ๐Ÿ‘ 10352 ๐Ÿ” 3080 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 162 ๐Ÿ“Œ 419

At it's best on a poppy roll or poppy bagel, IMHO

12.02.2026 15:23 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As a hater, I'm sure there's stuff to criticize in the study, but it's depressing that rage bait seems to be as big of a problem here as it was on Xitter.

11.02.2026 14:13 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FYI: not quite what the study was actually about:

bsky.app/profile/icas...

11.02.2026 13:02 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

two super bowls in a row with drake getting slammed

09.02.2026 01:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 549 ๐Ÿ” 106 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"As AI transยญforms academic labor, much more is at stake than the terms & conditions of our employment. At stake is the very integrity of the teaching & learning process & the notion that all humanityโ€”not just a few individualsโ€”should benefit from the production of knowledge at our universities."

06.02.2026 16:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 41 ๐Ÿ” 30 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Love the Havens pick. Just missed my 5.

06.02.2026 21:24 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

*Music From Big Pink -argh-

06.02.2026 21:07 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0