And though I ran out of steam, if this whets any appetite. Here is a bit year's worth of EJ papers in haiku form (One of the strange things that the Covid period did for me). sites.google.com/site/heskiba...
(and of course getting a chance to chat economics with some fantastic co-editors and associate editors). Very best to all.
It's been a priviledge to serve in this position (if sometimes exhausting after 935 new submissions ...). The greatest part of the job is seeing how many people in the profession take the role of refereeing so diligently, and constructively, and work hard to build this community.
Wishing Jin the very best and glad to leave the journal with an upgrade to the editorial board.
Congratulations on the many impressive accomplishments at the CMA, and very best with the new role.
Today, I am excited to release a paper that has been five years in the making, titled “Endogenous Firm Ownership in General Equilibrium.” I think it is the best thing I have done. www.nber.org/papers/w34187
Very proud of this honour and to be in some great company.
I was thrilled to join Emanuele Tarantino, Susan Athey, Cristina Caffarra & others for CEPR’s webinar on “Updating Merger Control as an Economic Policy Tool for Europe?”
How can merger policy adapt to support innovation, growth & strategic autonomy?
📺: youtu.be/CO_IJhFczCk
To honour the memory of Ghazala Azmat, the Department of Economics of SciencesPo is creating an award in her name. Ghazala made important contributions in a large number of fields, spanning the economics of discrimination, gender, education and organizational economics. The award will promote work in those fields by young scholars. The first edition of this award will consist of a 5,000 euro prize for the best paper in this set of fields by junior researchers. The selection of the laureate will be carried out by a scientific committee composed of Pierre Cahuc, Alan Manning and Barbara Petrongolo. Eligibility for the prize requires that all authors have obtained their PhD after 1 September 2018. Papers written jointly with more senior researchers will not be considered. The prize will be awarded at SciencesPo during the event organised in memory of Ghazala on 10 December 2025. One of the authors of the prize winning paper will present the work at this event. Applications must be submitted by 31 August 2025.
📢 #CallForPapers To honour the memory of Ghazala Azmat, the Economics Department of SciencesPo is creating an award in her name. Junior researchers can submit a paper in economics of discrimination, gender, education & organizational #economics. Submit by 31 August.
cepr.org/events/ghaza...
#EconSky
Many thanks for including me. Great program, interesting people, and lots of food for thought.
This put it well for those not lucky enough to have known Ghazala www.eeassoc.org/news/memoria...
She made us all better.
Truly devastating.
Cover of "Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance"
Mike Scherer, a leader in industrial organization economics, in the study of innovation, and in many other topics since the 1960s, has died at 92. Strikingly eclectic, he wrote (inter alia) about weapons procurement and the commercialization of classical music. More than anything /1
I want to make it training
athletes often spend a lot of time going from point a to point a and seem to believe that there is a reason to do so ...
Join the CMA Microeconomics Unit as a UKRI Policy Fellow for 18 months!
Awards buy out teaching/admin time to allow you to focus on a CMA-relevant research project, while embedded part-time in the Unit.
The call for fellowships is here: www.ukri.org/opportunity/...
1/
I love the Economic Journal referees ❤️
Revised version of a paper received on April 15. Sent out to original reviewers on the same day. All four referees have come back to me in less than 10 days.
Paper is now conditionally accepted, subject to checks by the EJ Data Editor 🚀 @resmedia.bsky.social
the last one is true?
maybe time for a new schtick?
time to write papers ...
I started suggesting that this is probably good advice (for an author) but depressing (socially costly in establish norms of what a paper is supposed to look like). Just one more example to add to prisonners' dilemma examples in class. A third party (e.g. editor) in principle can help internalize
I guess it depends on whether you think that the costs of producing (and reviewing) this length are neglible or not in relation to any (positive?) social value that they may generate.
Probably the right advice for authors (and may be right as first point), but point 1 is depressing as heck to me and why we get these massive unreadable tomes. I'd like to think that editors (try to) fight back on trying to get to essential points and readable papers; but fighting norms is hard.
TSE is putting together an IO and Finance conference in October, submissions now open and details at www.tse-fr.eu/conferences/...
There's a link in that article to a radio interview with Meg on CBC which is as frank and clear as you would expect.
Time to first decisions at The Economic Journal academic.oup.com/ej?login=true. Thanks to all the hard work and efforts of the referees, AEs and other editors. Please submit your excellent papers and expect an efficient and thoughtful response.
My old roommate at Oxford switched from law to Sanskrit for undergrad and made a fortune from countless scholarships for which he was the only qualified applicant; obviously in PE now 😂
Folks have put together starter packs of folks to follow. Here is an example bsky.app/starter-pack... but I would search for other topics for people you might be interested in.
On the second there’s work on boundedly rational managers (I have in mind an old paper of Mo Xiao and Avi Goldfarb) that may be relevant but I haven’t really kept track of either literature.
On the first part there’s an old IO literature on conduct parameters that is about the objective function (are we maximizing individual profits or colluding). I think Chris Sullivan at Wisconsin is a more recent contributor and could find more.
and I guess that last example suggests that conformity is not inconsistent with competition... good ideas diffuse (and sometimes people too: RES has now lost data editors to both the AEA and ES).
Also forgot data editors and replication checks which is a big and relatively new innovation that was introduced and rapidly became a norm
Publication lags (a year or more used to be normal) advice to referees (has become pretty standard but is a fairly recent innovation). To me a lot of unease and dysfunctionality is the status obsession and tyranny of top 5 and I don’t see much that moves the needle
