350,000 peoples’ lives hang in the balance. A majority entered the U.S. legally and have never been in violation of any immigration law. They’ve had to go through multiple background checks. And yet they’re hanging on by a thread, even though the situation in Haiti hasn’t gotten any better.
07.03.2026 05:12
👍 846
🔁 230
💬 5
📌 3
United States Onurt of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 26-5050
September Term, 2025
1:25-cv-02471-ACR
Filed On: March 6, 2026
Fritz Emmanuel Lesly Miot, et al.,
Appellees
V.
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America, et al.,
Appellants
BEFORE: Walker, Pan, and Garcia, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon consideration of the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal, the
opposition thereto, the reply, the amicus briefs, and the Rule 28(i) letters, it is
ORDERED that the motion for a stay be denied.
BREAKING: DC Circuit, on a 2-1 vote, keeps in place a lower court order blocking DHS Sec. Noem’s effort to end Haiti temporary protected status designation.
Judges Pan and Garcia deny DOJ’s request to stay the district court order. Judge Walker would have granted it.
Haiti TPS is safe for now.
07.03.2026 03:58
👍 2290
🔁 631
💬 17
📌 29
Kennedy Center’s noisy Friday: 2 lawsuits and an NSO director’s resignation
NSO director Jean Davidson cited “a hard year” in her decision to leave. Meanwhile, the center sues a drummer and a congresswoman sues the center.
Kennedy Center updates:
—Rep. Joyce Beatty (ex officio member of the board of trustees) is suing again, this time to make sure Trump doesn't demolish the center.
—Grenell has, as threatened, sued Chuck Redd for canceling a concert.
—The exec. director of the National Symphony Orchestra has quit.
07.03.2026 03:48
👍 136
🔁 39
💬 2
📌 4
I keep thinking about this weird thing where the DOJ is investigating Jerome Powell for allegedly lying to the Senate about renovations (even though no senators have accused him of lying), while Kristi Noem told the Senate Trump approved her $220M ad campaign and Trump himself said that wasn't true.
07.03.2026 03:50
👍 744
🔁 167
💬 16
📌 3
The Olden Times.
07.03.2026 03:43
👍 7
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
No, I doubt it. They are likely going to claim they’re not posting them because of the partial government shutdown.
06.03.2026 23:51
👍 8
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
It’s new urgency in the same way I used to play peekaboo with my daughter, I’d disappear and then appear anew, but she’s 4 now and she’s over it.
In that, she’s more of a strategist than anyone at DoD.
06.03.2026 23:37
👍 216
🔁 27
💬 2
📌 1
So frustrating!
06.03.2026 23:39
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Keeping an eye on how long it'll take them to open the warehouse in Socorro.
06.03.2026 21:58
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Huh. The demise of Camp East Montana may have been announced too soon.
06.03.2026 21:57
👍 160
🔁 48
💬 4
📌 0
And this is before the spike in gas prices that appears to be coming in a matter of days.
06.03.2026 21:45
👍 176
🔁 42
💬 18
📌 1
Latest Iran poll from NPR/PBS News/Marist conducted Monday-Wednesday finds 44% support/56% oppose military action. The -12 margin of net support is about the same as -11 across six polls conducted through March 3, suggesting initial reactions have persisted maristpoll.marist.edu/polls/war-wi...
06.03.2026 19:35
👍 65
🔁 19
💬 6
📌 14
4. In the rules summary displayed to users at the time the Market was opened and during the period when most trades were placed, Defendants prominently represented that “if Ali Khamenei leaves office before March 1, 2026, then the market resolves to yes.” This language was clear, unambiguous, and binary: if Khamenei left office for any reason—including death—the Market would resolve to “yes” and holders of “yes” positions would receive the full contractual payout. 5. On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched military strikes against Iran. News outlets began reporting that Khamenei had been killed. Khamenei’s death was subsequently confirmed. By any reasonable interpretation of the Market’s terms, Khamenei had “left office” before March 1, 2026, and the Market should have resolved to “yes.” 6. Instead, after Khamenei’s death became public, Defendants invoked a socalled “death carveout” provision—a fine-print mechanism designed to allow Defendants to avoid paying consumers what they were owed when the predicted event occurred through its most foreseeable scenario. Under this provision, Defendants asserted that if the leader “leaves solely because they have died,” the Market would
Lawgeeks, here's the complaint against Kalshi for not paying out the bet on "Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader" because he died.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
06.03.2026 20:39
👍 121
🔁 26
💬 3
📌 11
"When we declare we've won they've essentially surrendered" is an... interesting way to try to avoid the embarrassment of the "mission accomplished" banner.
06.03.2026 21:17
👍 159
🔁 27
💬 7
📌 2
A one month chart of oil prices
Oil prices are going parabolic. This is insane.
06.03.2026 18:01
👍 1433
🔁 362
💬 80
📌 382
They think, or at least pretend to think, that this doesn’t sound like obvious cope to everyone in the world
It’s an entire White House comms shop built on the premise of “my hot girlfriend lives in Canada” being believed by normal people
06.03.2026 18:42
👍 2248
🔁 351
💬 97
📌 15
Tesla sued after Austin shooting suspect allegedly assaulted co-worker
A 65-year-old woman says the automaker ignored warning signs before Ndiaga Diagne, the suspect in Sunday’s mass shooting, assaulted her. She sued Thursday.
the Austin mass shooter was a Tesla employee who assaulted a coworker during a company-allowed prayer break late last year
the company refused to give the victim her assailant's name so she could press charges, and he went on to become a mass shooter
www.statesman.com/business/art...
06.03.2026 17:07
👍 4960
🔁 1805
💬 65
📌 135
This policy needs to be revisited. A couple thousand of these cases around the country in last few months. Many filings inaccessible.
Even causes problems for US Attorney offices because THEY can't see the filings remotely unless the specific attorney is assigned to that case
06.03.2026 16:56
👍 314
🔁 78
💬 2
📌 0
They talk in the affidavit about how they'd just moved to an electronic refund system but a lot of importers are still not registered there yet.
06.03.2026 16:06
👍 13
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
26. CBP has never been ordered to, nor has it attempted to, process a volume of refunds
anywhere near the volume of total entries and Entry Summary lines on which IEEPA
duties have been deposited. However, where CBP’s predecessor, the U.S. Customs
Service, was previously ordered to refund to exporters the Harbor Maintenance Fee
(HMF) that was held to have been unconstitutionally imposed as applied to exports by
the Supreme Court in United States Shoe Corporation v. United States (1998), the
process took several years to complete and required an updated regulatory procedure.
There is an interesting historical note saying that the last time a major duty was struck down as unconstitutional, it took the Customs Service "several years" to issue all the refunds. So if CBP's new plan to have a system up and running in 45 days is actually feasible, that would be a lot faster.
06.03.2026 16:05
👍 187
🔁 21
💬 10
📌 1
CBP calculates that doing it manually would take 4.43 million man-hours, which to be fair is a hell of a lot.
06.03.2026 16:03
👍 182
🔁 17
💬 16
📌 9
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW FUNCTIONALITY IN ACE
27. CBP has a history of developing effective processes to meet its legal responsibilities and
operational needs that also provide efficiencies for industry, and we continue to do so
now. In preparing for the potential need to refund IEEPA duties, CBP has considered
how to implement a process to issue IEEPA duty refunds in a more efficient manner than
the above-described, currently available processes. CBP is confident that it can develop
and implement new ACE functionality that will streamline and consolidate refunds and
interest payments on an importer basis, rather than issuing 53,173,939 separate entryspecific refunds with multiple payments going to the same importer. Though
operational, legal, and technical considerations may require alterations or modifications,
CBP anticipates that the process will involve the following steps:
• The importer files a declaration in ACE that includes a list of entries on which
IEEPA duties were paid.
• ACE runs a series of validations on each entry within the declaration and
automatically re-calculates the duty owed without the IEEPA tariffs (with
applicable interest).
• CBP verifies the declaration and processes refunds as soon as practicable.
• ACE automatically finalizes (liquidates or reliquidates) the entries.
• ACE automatically aggregates the refunds with interest by importer and
liquidation date.
• CBP certifies the refunds.
• The Department of the Treasury issues IEEPA refunds electronically.
28. CBP estimates that the automated controls described above will save CBP over 4 million
hours compared with the manual processes it would otherwise have to complete.
29. CBP is making all possible efforts to have this new ACE functionality ready for use in 45
days. This new process will require minimal submission from importers. It will also
minimize errors by ensuring accurate IEEPA refund calculations through system
validations and allowing for a review period for CBP to resolve any discrepancies with
the importer and to confirm no other outstanding enforcement issues or no revenue is
owed. The process will be simpler and more efficient than the existing functionalities,
and CBP will provide guidance on how to file to refund declarations in the new system.
CBP does say it has a plan, though! It's just going to take a couple months for them to stand it up.
06.03.2026 16:01
👍 180
🔁 21
💬 9
📌 5
CBP puts the blame on legacy IT systems. To be blunt, while these problems may be completely valid, this is entirely the fault of the government.
06.03.2026 15:59
👍 1075
🔁 270
💬 69
📌 47
Thanks! So looks like they are saying that it would require a very significant IT upgrade. Guess they should’ve thought about that first!
06.03.2026 15:56
👍 21
🔁 1
💬 2
📌 0
Do you have a link to that?
06.03.2026 15:51
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
This is not accurate. In fact, no country required its submarines to rescue survivors, due to the risk of surfacing and/or limited space to keep prisoners in the very small, cramped subs. What they were expected to do was not attack survivors in the water.
06.03.2026 15:31
👍 431
🔁 66
💬 22
📌 6
Trump thinks this will be Venezuela, over in a week, then onto Cuba
06.03.2026 14:10
👍 316
🔁 70
💬 40
📌 1