Matt Darling's Avatar

Matt Darling

@besttrousers

49,072
Followers
796
Following
7,983
Posts
27.04.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Matt Darling @besttrousers

Preview
The one thing driving U.S. job growth The U.S. added some 130,000 jobs in January. Almost all of those jobs were in just one sector: Health care. Why aren’t jobs growing anywhere else?

Thanks to Meghna Chakrabarti and Claire Donnelly for having me on to chat about health care employment on their @wbur.org show On Point! We could have gone on a lot longer. You can listen here:

www.wbur.org/onpoint/2026...

07.03.2026 02:32 👍 12 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0

Read @sharonk.bsky.social. great insights on FP!

07.03.2026 01:19 👍 54 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1
Video thumbnail

CBPP's @gbenga-ajilore.bsky.social provides insights and analysis on the latest jobs data released today.

06.03.2026 21:49 👍 15 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 1

I think that it's very likely that the residual between hard and soft data is constant, while the hard data gets bad.

06.03.2026 23:52 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Maybe it's the only sane period.

06.03.2026 23:47 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I don't think economists really did? Like @ernietedeschi.bsky.social's analysis was solid.

I think partly 1.) lots of non econ people put out bad vibes that went backed up by models/data 2.) the original announced tariffs were much higher than final implemented tariffs.

06.03.2026 23:17 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Raising taxes - even in a dumb way like tariffs - is not plausibly causing a recession.

(Especially insofar as OBBA negates it)

06.03.2026 23:13 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

It's like arguing that Obamacare was going to cause a recession. Just a misunderstanding of the size of flows or what causes recessions.

06.03.2026 23:12 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Yes.

Nominal GDP is $31 trillion.

2024 government receipts were $3.1 trillion.

06.03.2026 23:11 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Guy we almost got to talk about labor markets without macro.

We were so close.

06.03.2026 23:05 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image Post image

My recap of today's jobs report. Don't overreact to the February data...

Instead, you should worry about what spiking oil prices will do to future data.

Link: macromostly.substack.com/p/bls-jobs-r...

06.03.2026 22:59 👍 21 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0

Unemployment insurance is truly incredible.

06.03.2026 22:56 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

What hath @weratedogs.com wrought.

06.03.2026 22:34 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

FOLKS THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU USE OLS ON A BOUNDED CONTINUOUS VARIABLE 🤦

06.03.2026 18:34 👍 74 🔁 4 💬 4 📌 1

Good economy doesn't mean good for everyone (but to some extent it's a precondition for things being good for most people).

06.03.2026 22:14 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image Post image

Remember the famed 1990s productivity boom? Post-covid era is now beating it. That includes nice wage increases, and an even higher rate of growth in the non-financial corporate sector. I continue to be surprised nobody cares about this, outside massive dorkwads.

06.03.2026 18:03 👍 65 🔁 11 💬 8 📌 0

I would just like to note that I would have purchased a Switch 2 and several games in a non-tariff counterfactual.

06.03.2026 21:20 👍 92 🔁 9 💬 2 📌 0

Never is tbh.

06.03.2026 21:08 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Not a great time for widespread implementation of work requirements for SNAP now is it?

06.03.2026 14:16 👍 25 🔁 3 💬 3 📌 0

Windows.

(Claude Code is the first time I've used the terminal since....1995?)

06.03.2026 21:08 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

What would you recommend for non-software engineers that just want to make unemployment graphs?

06.03.2026 21:01 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Ok, but what does it do for the top 0.1%?

06.03.2026 20:52 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
The Tinder-ization of the job market Why nobody's getting hired in a "good" economy

Just wrote an AI piece about labor market effects!

www.theargumentmag.com/p/the-tinder...

06.03.2026 20:51 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

"there is a lot of ruin in a nation" wasn't supposed to be a prescriptive claim!

06.03.2026 20:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Yep (but also there are always emerging problems. There were emerging problems in 2022 and it was managed.)

06.03.2026 20:31 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

That's 5.2. need to use 5.4.

06.03.2026 20:29 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Blueskyism.

06.03.2026 20:21 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Pretty close!

The detrended payroll standard deviation since 1/1/2022 is 117k (184k without detrending).

06.03.2026 20:18 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Thanks!

wrt the insurance facility - is this subsidizing the insurance? Or directly paying? (sorry no FT subscription).

06.03.2026 20:11 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Oh sure, yeah I was thinking about consumer experience not FOMC reaction function.

06.03.2026 19:45 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0