Fuss's Avatar

Fuss

@semperfitrex

History guy. Game enjoyer. Guaranteed beacon of friendship and love*. *friendship and love not a guarantee

1,521
Followers
378
Following
12,932
Posts
07.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Fuss @semperfitrex

My personal view is that every officer involved in this adventure should be tried for murder under domestic law but they're mostly fine under international law.

07.03.2026 05:10 πŸ‘ 62 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Excited for the follow-up article "Why Honor Killings Make Better Daughters."

07.03.2026 06:42 πŸ‘ 27 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

How dare you root against the troops. They're not ordering the overtly evil things, only doing them. 😑

07.03.2026 03:26 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Podcaster vs Economist got me rooting for injuries.

07.03.2026 03:22 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The thing about all these freak AI execs constantly going "our machine may have gained sentience?!" is that they want slaves. That they are ok with slave labor.

And *then* it always, always turns out their latest AI trick actually used slave labor somewhere in the global south.

They're slavers.

06.03.2026 17:05 πŸ‘ 1291 πŸ” 426 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 15

It's funny how among the funniest moments in British history is Pitt the Elder and Lloyd George catching flak for suggesting focusing on fronts away from the French border, and greenlighting operations that helped end the war.

07.03.2026 01:11 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

He sold them cocaine.

07.03.2026 00:13 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Right? The obnoxious lefties are defending the Nazis. The obnoxious liberals are defending the corpses.

It's easy to differentiate!

06.03.2026 23:38 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

2nd War for Armageddon.

Two real factions fighting it out, until the poster children dove in to make it all about them.

But oh well, fun story before that.

06.03.2026 22:45 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The issues facing the United States are not entirely human factors.

The underlying ones are caused by systems, not people. They are simply exacerbated by human failings.

06.03.2026 22:24 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

True. Anymore, there's always at least one front seven that's essentially a big SS, or just a straight up CB instead.

06.03.2026 22:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The same way that the Democrats will put everything back together if they somehow get power in 2026-2028.

The option where it doesn't just magically get better is too depressing, so shut up and stop pointing out flaws in the argument, you doomer.

06.03.2026 22:17 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

True, but you don't need a HoF guy to be a nose tackle, either. Some guys make great nose tackles, but mediocre 4-3 DTs.

I'd argue that's exactly what Jason Ferguson was!

06.03.2026 22:12 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

All else being equal, I'll take the 4-3!

But the argument was back in 2007, about the Cowboys and Patriots defenses, and I was *not* having it.

06.03.2026 22:03 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

One of the biggest cruxes of the argument was that MLB was one of the toughest positions to play, so there's no way a team would be better if they used two.

Because good edge rushing linemen and dual threat DTs are a dime a dozen, as we are all aware.

06.03.2026 22:02 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

"MY NOSE TACKLE WILL GET SIX SACKS A YEAR WHEN WE PUT ANOTHER NOSE TACKLE NEXT TO HIM AND PULL A LINEBACKER"

Mysteries of that variety.

06.03.2026 22:00 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

One of my favorite stupid arguments I ever got in was a guy insisting that the 4-3 was the clearly superior defensive scheme, regardless of the defensive players available, or the opponent they're facing off against.

I think about that one every once in a while when I see the people running the US.

06.03.2026 21:58 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

WAIT NO I'VE GOT A BETTER ONE

06.03.2026 21:56 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's pretty... bleak.

06.03.2026 21:55 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Also, a mesh concept? What kind of cowardly passing playbook is this? If you're throwing less than 30 yards at a time, you might as well be running.

06.03.2026 21:53 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

This is war as content creation. The entire administration is centered around content creation. A β€œwin” here will be whenever they feel like they’ve worn out this particular storyline and are ready to move on to the next chapter and generate more content.

06.03.2026 01:48 πŸ‘ 29 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

EIGHT MAN BLITZ EIGHT MAN BLITZ

06.03.2026 21:49 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

"Calling my DoorDash driver comrade before stiffing him on a tip because he was two minutes late during a tornado warning" is the full extent of their class consciousness and solidarity.

06.03.2026 21:47 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

American Rich Boy Leftism is all about never, *ever* looking at the relationship to the means of production, because then they might have to acknowledge that they're simply ruling-class failures, instead of oppressed proletarians.

06.03.2026 21:46 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

Classist chads stay winning.

06.03.2026 19:29 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's class. It's always class.

06.03.2026 19:29 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

A more interesting and diverse world, even if I'm not part of those communities. Not everything is for me, but it's nice to see how many people can be things that aren't for me, while I still have My Stuff, as well.

06.03.2026 19:21 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's weirdly soothing to see Bluesky's communities of aging furries and LGBTQ people, because it's evident that those cultures aren't going anywhere, even if people have tried to break them for far longer than I've been alive.

06.03.2026 19:21 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The Trump people are used to only spending time around their own, and don't realize how there are large numbers of people around the world who aren't actually keen on being enslaved and/or betrayed to their deaths by Donald Trump.

06.03.2026 18:21 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Class solidarity, as always, will triumph. Both men have only one ideology: endless hunger.

06.03.2026 18:18 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0