In the near future, in addition to discussion of Christopher Alexander and who-knows-what-else, we're hoping to do some live-Cursor sessions in which @irondavy.bsky.social tries to teach me how to be a contemporary. WE SHALL SEE OFC!!!
In the near future, in addition to discussion of Christopher Alexander and who-knows-what-else, we're hoping to do some live-Cursor sessions in which @irondavy.bsky.social tries to teach me how to be a contemporary. WE SHALL SEE OFC!!!
And most recently, I riff off a great post by Julie Zhuo from chats with Henry Modisett about what LLMs mean for working designers today.
Then, giving into some of my worst tendencies, I discuss Apple's issues with "Apple Intelligence" and what they tell us about LLMs generally.
First. @irondavy.bsky.social wrote "The Command of Language," in which he discusses how to think about communicating with LLMs: "When you ask an LLM to behave as though it has a real personβs experience, you are asking it to do something that is functionally groundless." This turns out to matter!
I don't know what @irondavy.bsky.social and I were thinking when we decided to start a Substack about design, but it certainly wasn't about LLMs. Nevertheless! Three of the first four posts have related to them in one way or another.
I donβt know why but this savage roast of Mahler is killing me; you think death is the end, but no: you can get rekt in perpetuity
Lmfao
Yooo!!! Whatβs good man?!