Jaye @ TeamRetroFox's Avatar

Jaye @ TeamRetroFox

@jayebunny

He/Him πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ‡ Jaye Bunny of TeamRetroFox on #twitch! #Strategy #Simulation #Mystery #Horror #Retro games, #DungeonsAndDragons, and all sorts of other #gaming. http://twitch.tv/TeamRetroFox http://youtube.com/@TeamRetroFox

343
Followers
323
Following
3,343
Posts
19.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Jaye @ TeamRetroFox @jayebunny

John Carter is 14.

Art by Ryan Church:

09.03.2026 17:50 πŸ‘ 131 πŸ” 14 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 0
Lye looks surprised as Art stands behind them and says β€œdamn that tank makes you look hot as fuck. Makes me wish I could hit it”

Lye looks surprised as Art stands behind them and says β€œdamn that tank makes you look hot as fuck. Makes me wish I could hit it”

Panel from a WIP

10.03.2026 00:00 πŸ‘ 1385 πŸ” 113 πŸ’¬ 15 πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
a cartoon drawing of a robot and a purple monster with youtube.com written below it ALT: a cartoon drawing of a robot and a purple monster with youtube.com written below it

I'd like to have a word with father time.

10.03.2026 00:19 πŸ‘ 106 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

He go #deltarune

09.03.2026 23:40 πŸ‘ 883 πŸ” 167 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1

big timeskip
party never disbanded 😌

09.03.2026 23:57 πŸ‘ 6777 πŸ” 1442 πŸ’¬ 34 πŸ“Œ 6
Post image

somethin like that #art

10.03.2026 01:54 πŸ‘ 933 πŸ” 179 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 1
Video thumbnail

She's TOO strong! 😰

09.03.2026 21:40 πŸ‘ 752 πŸ” 146 πŸ’¬ 9 πŸ“Œ 0

Put me and Ickystyx together and it’s gonna be chaos youtube.com/shorts/-IL1w...

10.03.2026 04:08 πŸ‘ 16 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

this is like the best thing i've ever drawn so much so that i'm kinda intimidated now LOL

10.03.2026 04:10 πŸ‘ 1062 πŸ” 60 πŸ’¬ 15 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

buns roasting each other...Sybil is winnig by a taller advantage

14.02.2026 22:21 πŸ‘ 538 πŸ” 82 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

HEY. WE'RE STREAMING HORROR DEMOS AND UMIGARI BY CHILLA'S ARTS TONIGHT.

www.twitch.tv/spaceyeen

10.03.2026 04:15 πŸ‘ 74 πŸ” 12 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Hey y'all been awhile had some stuff but here's a new work i've done regarding a thicc bun boy by the name of @butterblast.bsky.social it was for practice and was neat to do enjoy!

10.03.2026 02:20 πŸ‘ 27 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Night stroll! πŸŒƒ

09.03.2026 16:44 πŸ‘ 640 πŸ” 144 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

This week on #twitch!

08.03.2026 23:33 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Jaye from TeamRetroFox - Wishlist | Throne Send Jaye from TeamRetroFox gifts via Throne. Browse Jaye from TeamRetroFox's wishlist and support your favorite creator safely.

If you'd like to help me out with 3D printing or painting supplies, I've got a #Throne #Wishlist set up here!

04.03.2026 20:41 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Still looking to sell my #fursuit! $900 or best offer.

04.12.2025 17:44 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 18 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Playing Jackbox games with @icklenellierose.bsky.social and chat! Come on in~!

09.03.2026 22:29 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

The models are made of what now?!

{Suggested by @/fenrirslip.bsky.social.}

09.03.2026 22:11 πŸ‘ 52 πŸ” 17 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’ͺ

09.03.2026 19:40 πŸ‘ 528 πŸ” 70 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1
Comic. [Person with long hair announcing news. There are images of a sun with a smiley face labelled β€œlast week” and a sun with a frowny face labeled β€œtoday.”] PERSON: A warning for solar flares and geomagnetic storms has been issued after new images from the solar and heliospheric observatory show that the big smiley face on the sun has turned into a frown.

Comic. [Person with long hair announcing news. There are images of a sun with a smiley face labelled β€œlast week” and a sun with a frowny face labeled β€œtoday.”] PERSON: A warning for solar flares and geomagnetic storms has been issued after new images from the solar and heliospheric observatory show that the big smiley face on the sun has turned into a frown.

Solar Warning

xkcd.com/3215/

09.03.2026 20:09 πŸ‘ 2920 πŸ” 380 πŸ’¬ 27 πŸ“Œ 9
Post image Post image Post image

April 4-5th : FURST CLASS Paws Roastery TIME TABLE

The timetable has been released! I'll be performing at two events: the Dog Club on 4/4 from 18:30-22:00, and the DJ Party on 4/5 from 17:00-19:00! Please come and join us!

More detail : en.furst-class.com/2026event

09.03.2026 20:21 πŸ‘ 29 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
09.03.2026 19:12 πŸ‘ 4501 πŸ” 1404 πŸ’¬ 12 πŸ“Œ 0
Screenshot of my account on Twitter of the post I made that caused a lot of issues. Reads:

β€œYou ARE NOT for art liberation if you don’t make space for the weird art, the immoral art, the art the makes you uncomfortable, the art that makes you unfollow, the art that your friend hates, the fetish art, the kink art, the”

Screenshot of my account on Twitter of the post I made that caused a lot of issues. Reads: β€œYou ARE NOT for art liberation if you don’t make space for the weird art, the immoral art, the art the makes you uncomfortable, the art that makes you unfollow, the art that your friend hates, the fetish art, the kink art, the”

once more.

09.02.2026 21:13 πŸ‘ 3398 πŸ” 1404 πŸ’¬ 38 πŸ“Œ 25
Email from Chris Reynolds to the AXIS Team. Subject is disappointing AXIS news. Text of e-mail reads: Dear AXIS Friends,


The AXIS team has received some very disappointing news – we have been informed by NASA HQ that AXIS is not eligible for selection and hence the Concept Study Report (CSR) will not be subjected to the full review process.   


AXIS represents the scientific aspirations of a large international community. As a member of one of the AXIS science working groups, you deserve a candid explanation from the PI of what happened and why.  That is the purpose of this note.


NASA’s decision was programmatic and not based on a review of the technology or science; the mission profile described in the submitted CSR was over the allowed budget and schedule.  How was such a thing possible?   In short, with NASA-GSFC as the AXIS managing center, the mission formulation process was critically compromised by the seismic shifts occurring in NASA and the Federal government.  The AXIS study team was hit hard by three unprecedented challenges: 


NASA’s Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) and the pressure at GSFC to resign/retire created a rapid and uncontrolled loss of over 20 personnel with key expertise during a critical mission formulation period, including the main GSFC Project Manager (Jimmy Marsh) and the X-ray mirror lead (Will Zhang) and many discipline engineers.

Email from Chris Reynolds to the AXIS Team. Subject is disappointing AXIS news. Text of e-mail reads: Dear AXIS Friends, The AXIS team has received some very disappointing news – we have been informed by NASA HQ that AXIS is not eligible for selection and hence the Concept Study Report (CSR) will not be subjected to the full review process. AXIS represents the scientific aspirations of a large international community. As a member of one of the AXIS science working groups, you deserve a candid explanation from the PI of what happened and why. That is the purpose of this note. NASA’s decision was programmatic and not based on a review of the technology or science; the mission profile described in the submitted CSR was over the allowed budget and schedule. How was such a thing possible? In short, with NASA-GSFC as the AXIS managing center, the mission formulation process was critically compromised by the seismic shifts occurring in NASA and the Federal government. The AXIS study team was hit hard by three unprecedented challenges: NASA’s Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) and the pressure at GSFC to resign/retire created a rapid and uncontrolled loss of over 20 personnel with key expertise during a critical mission formulation period, including the main GSFC Project Manager (Jimmy Marsh) and the X-ray mirror lead (Will Zhang) and many discipline engineers.

GSFC priorities rapidly realigned to the FY2026 President’s Budget Request (PBR) that eliminated the Probe program, further reducing the availability of GSFC engineering and mission formulation personnel (incl. cost analysts and schedulers) over the critical Summer and Fall months. Key work was halted for almost seven weeks when the core GSFC AXIS study team, dominated by NASA civil servants, was furloughed during the government shutdown.  NASA HQ’s extension to the CSR submission deadline (from 18-Dec-2025 to 29-Jan-2026) was inadequate compensation for the disruption and lost time.


Taken together, these factors disrupted the basic grass-roots costing process (which requires extensive β€œreach back” to the discipline engineers to assess labor requirements) as well as the cost-design iteration process that is central to the formulation of a cost-capped and schedule-constrained mission.  While the mission design was finalized in April, our initial grass-roots costing (which was ~10% over budget) could only be completed in September due to the lack of assigned resources.  With the subsequent government shutdown and then β€œpens down” in early-December forced by the GSFC Executive Review process, there was no opportunity to work through the set of cost/schedule savings that had already been identified by the AXIS team. 


Ultimately, the GSFC executive council gave AXIS leadership the choice of submitting a CSR with a non-compliant schedule and cost, or not submitting a CSR at all.  We of course proceeded with the submission, including a narrative that we understood the path to a cost-compliant profile (that we would have discussed with the review panels during the Site Visit). NASA HQ has ruled this stance to be unacceptable.


It is important to stress that NASA’s programmatic decision was before any technical review had been conducted.  The decision was NOT due to any concerns about AXIS technology. Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering

GSFC priorities rapidly realigned to the FY2026 President’s Budget Request (PBR) that eliminated the Probe program, further reducing the availability of GSFC engineering and mission formulation personnel (incl. cost analysts and schedulers) over the critical Summer and Fall months. Key work was halted for almost seven weeks when the core GSFC AXIS study team, dominated by NASA civil servants, was furloughed during the government shutdown. NASA HQ’s extension to the CSR submission deadline (from 18-Dec-2025 to 29-Jan-2026) was inadequate compensation for the disruption and lost time. Taken together, these factors disrupted the basic grass-roots costing process (which requires extensive β€œreach back” to the discipline engineers to assess labor requirements) as well as the cost-design iteration process that is central to the formulation of a cost-capped and schedule-constrained mission. While the mission design was finalized in April, our initial grass-roots costing (which was ~10% over budget) could only be completed in September due to the lack of assigned resources. With the subsequent government shutdown and then β€œpens down” in early-December forced by the GSFC Executive Review process, there was no opportunity to work through the set of cost/schedule savings that had already been identified by the AXIS team. Ultimately, the GSFC executive council gave AXIS leadership the choice of submitting a CSR with a non-compliant schedule and cost, or not submitting a CSR at all. We of course proceeded with the submission, including a narrative that we understood the path to a cost-compliant profile (that we would have discussed with the review panels during the Site Visit). NASA HQ has ruled this stance to be unacceptable. It is important to stress that NASA’s programmatic decision was before any technical review had been conducted. The decision was NOT due to any concerns about AXIS technology. Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering

Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering the key technologies. GSFC’s Next Generation X-ray Optics (NGXO) team successfully demonstrated iridium-coated, stress-compensated mirror segments that meet AXIS baseline requirements (i.e. segment-level performance at sub-arcsecond level).Β  NGXO also built the first AXIS demonstrator mirror module, learning critical lessons about mirror alignment, mounting and bonding. On the detector side, MIT quickly moved to fabricate AXIS-like CCDs and, working with our colleagues at Stanford, recently demonstrated that they achieve the required readout rate and spectral resolution. 


Similarly, NASA’s decision was NOT a judgment of the importance of AXIS science.  The AXIS science case was rated excellent in the Step 1 review, and it only became stronger during our Phase A study.  The AXIS Community Science Book, which many of you contributed to, is an extremely powerful demonstration of the relevance and importance of high-resolution X-ray observations to all areas of astrophysics. The Science Book is one of the most important legacies of the AXIS Phase A study and, I believe, will help define future mission concepts for many years to come.  I thank you all from the bottom of my heart for all of your work on this.


AXIS has been a long journey; we started under the leadership of Richard Mushotzky more than nine years ago.  During that time, it’s been an enormous privilege to work with amazing people; the AXIS science team, the incredible/brilliant GSFC and Northrop Grumman engineers, and the wider astrophysics community.  I am, quite frankly, livid that AXIS ultimately fell victim to the programmatic chaos of 2025. The astronomical community deserves better. I hope that NASA leadership, especially at GSFC and HQ, can have an honest discussion about how to better support and protect programs during extraordinary times.

Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering the key technologies. GSFC’s Next Generation X-ray Optics (NGXO) team successfully demonstrated iridium-coated, stress-compensated mirror segments that meet AXIS baseline requirements (i.e. segment-level performance at sub-arcsecond level).Β  NGXO also built the first AXIS demonstrator mirror module, learning critical lessons about mirror alignment, mounting and bonding. On the detector side, MIT quickly moved to fabricate AXIS-like CCDs and, working with our colleagues at Stanford, recently demonstrated that they achieve the required readout rate and spectral resolution. Similarly, NASA’s decision was NOT a judgment of the importance of AXIS science. The AXIS science case was rated excellent in the Step 1 review, and it only became stronger during our Phase A study. The AXIS Community Science Book, which many of you contributed to, is an extremely powerful demonstration of the relevance and importance of high-resolution X-ray observations to all areas of astrophysics. The Science Book is one of the most important legacies of the AXIS Phase A study and, I believe, will help define future mission concepts for many years to come. I thank you all from the bottom of my heart for all of your work on this. AXIS has been a long journey; we started under the leadership of Richard Mushotzky more than nine years ago. During that time, it’s been an enormous privilege to work with amazing people; the AXIS science team, the incredible/brilliant GSFC and Northrop Grumman engineers, and the wider astrophysics community. I am, quite frankly, livid that AXIS ultimately fell victim to the programmatic chaos of 2025. The astronomical community deserves better. I hope that NASA leadership, especially at GSFC and HQ, can have an honest discussion about how to better support and protect programs during extraordinary times.

For now, as a community, we must look forward. There is still one excellent mission under consideration for the Probe program, PRIMA, and we wish them a smooth and speedy path to selection and flight.  In X-ray astronomy, the SMEX and MidEX programs represent concrete pathways for focused, high-impact missions, and the scientific case we built for AXIS provides a strong foundation for those concepts. The technologies we advanced in Step 1 and Phase A, particularly the NGXO mirror work and the MIT/Stanford detector demonstrations, can anchor the next generation of proposals. Most importantly, the AXIS Community Science Book, representing more than 500 scientists across, is a living document and a powerful signal to NASA leadership that this community is organized, serious, and not going anywhere. I encourage everyone to use it actively, as a resource for future concept development, for Astro2030 engagement, and for building the next mission that will deliver high angular resolution X-ray imaging to address the fundamental questions about black hole growth, galaxy evolution, and the hot universe that motivated AXIS from the beginning. This community built something remarkable over nine years and that doesn't end here.


Thank you again for your support of AXIS over these times.


Best

Chris and the AXIS leadership team

For now, as a community, we must look forward. There is still one excellent mission under consideration for the Probe program, PRIMA, and we wish them a smooth and speedy path to selection and flight. In X-ray astronomy, the SMEX and MidEX programs represent concrete pathways for focused, high-impact missions, and the scientific case we built for AXIS provides a strong foundation for those concepts. The technologies we advanced in Step 1 and Phase A, particularly the NGXO mirror work and the MIT/Stanford detector demonstrations, can anchor the next generation of proposals. Most importantly, the AXIS Community Science Book, representing more than 500 scientists across, is a living document and a powerful signal to NASA leadership that this community is organized, serious, and not going anywhere. I encourage everyone to use it actively, as a resource for future concept development, for Astro2030 engagement, and for building the next mission that will deliver high angular resolution X-ray imaging to address the fundamental questions about black hole growth, galaxy evolution, and the hot universe that motivated AXIS from the beginning. This community built something remarkable over nine years and that doesn't end here. Thank you again for your support of AXIS over these times. Best Chris and the AXIS leadership team

The @axisprobe.bsky.social team learned that the phase A concept study report of AXIS (the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite) will not be reviewed because the lost personnel at NASA Goddard and government shutdown impacted our schedule and budget. πŸ”­ Here is the PI's e-mail with the explanation.

09.03.2026 20:05 πŸ‘ 208 πŸ” 86 πŸ’¬ 20 πŸ“Œ 27
Preview
Twitch Twitch is the world

Chill stream today. Trying to make a little extra scratch so if you wanna come by and chill with me, the door is open <3

MausTheMouse.live right now~

09.03.2026 20:47 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

Yummyniku
Color sketch comm for @mallow.gay and @largefluffydog.bsky.social

09.03.2026 16:51 πŸ‘ 1776 πŸ” 477 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 1

I’m repeating myself but man. Can you imagine playing a game entirely populated by characters who talk like this. 80 hours of slurry. I can feel my life force slipping away just thinking about it

09.03.2026 21:56 πŸ‘ 38 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Got an actual date for the endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. April 15th. Then a few days in recovery and, hopefully, that'll be that and my hormones will start to level out. I gotta go off my Zepbound 2 weeks prior. Hoping my weight doesn't bounce back in that period.

09.03.2026 22:45 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Alternate version of previous comic. An alpaca is sitting with sketchbook and art supplies. 
Alpaca: Today I will draw something sad.

Alternate version of previous comic. An alpaca is sitting with sketchbook and art supplies. Alpaca: Today I will draw something sad.

alpaca drawing something intensely

alpaca drawing something intensely

Alpaca: It's another creepy bsky dev crashing out!
(sketch is a stick-figure person crying and screaming: WAAA! Our userbase is all furry freaks! I hate you all!)

Alpaca: It's another creepy bsky dev crashing out! (sketch is a stick-figure person crying and screaming: WAAA! Our userbase is all furry freaks! I hate you all!)

super cutting alternate version

09.03.2026 18:17 πŸ‘ 390 πŸ” 108 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

I SEND GAY #furry #vrchat #regulus #wawawa

09.03.2026 21:42 πŸ‘ 104 πŸ” 24 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 1