Alguna vez alguien me explicará por qué las siestas son tan fáciles (con luz y ruido) y dormir de noche es tan complicao, si las condiciones son óptimas (oscuridad y, generalmente, silencio).
QUE ALGUIEN ME LO EXPLIQUE.
Y de los mejores🥵
A mí lo que me cuesta es dormir con ellos🙃
¿Más? Yo ya no puedo😔
A ver los paquetes que os han traído los Reyes 👀
Da igual la serie o película en que lo vea: no hay ninguna en la que me crea a Rodolfo Sancho
Whatever one thinks of the attack on Venezuela, you have to admire the skill and strategic precision of the military forces that stormed Madura's fortress and so effectively removed the Epstein Files from the headlines.
Me encanta la riñonera😍
Ostia, Isma, no lo sabía 😥
¿Qué país estaba destruyendo EEUU en el año de tu nacimiento?
¿Qué bar es ese?👀
Seguimos para bingo
MI GENTE LATINO
Ojalá esto acabe en 2026
Twitter thread in Spanish by José Mario de la Garza, a human rights lawyer in Mexico, translated using Google Translate: 1. Overthrowing a dictator sounds morally right. No one mourns a tyrant. But international law wasn't built to protect the good, but to restrain the powerful. That's why it prohibits force almost without exception: not because it ignores injustice, but because it knows that if each country decides whom to "liberate" by force, the world reverts to the law of the strongest. 2. The problem is not Maduro. The problem is the precedent. When military force is used to change governments without clear rules, sovereignty ceases to be a limit and becomes an obstacle. Today it is “overthrowing a dictator”; tomorrow it will be “correcting an election,” “protecting interests,” “restoring order.” The law does not absolve dictatorships, but neither does it legitimize unilateral crusades.
Cont’d: 3. The uncomfortable question is not whether a tyrant deserves to fall, but who decides when and how. Because history teaches something brutal: removing a dictator is easy; building justice afterward is not. And when legality is broken in the name of good, what almost always follows is not freedom, but chaos, violence, and new victims. The law exists to remind us of this, even when it makes us uncomfortable.
Maduro isn't the problem: he's the face of the problem. Removing him from power would be merely opening the door. Behind him is the machine: Rodríguez, Cabello, the military command, the operators of repression and plunder. If you only change the person at the top and leave the system intact, what follows isn't democracy: it's a reshuffling. And there's something even more difficult: Chavismo didn't just capture institutions, it captured daily life. Economy, media, bureaucracy, employment, fear, favors, blackmail. A country can't be "de-Chavistaized" by decree or by an electoral miracle. The real transition begins when that network is broken without setting the country ablaze. The challenge is enormous, and it's also a moral one: to unite without vengeance, but without impunity. Targeted justice for those most responsible, truth for the victims, guarantees that the rest will dismantle the system, and a plan for people to live again—not just survive. Because freedom doesn't come with a new president: it comes when the state ceases to be a threat.
Best thing I’ve read this morning, from a human rights lawyer in Mexico. Translation is in the ALT-text.
¿Los espejos enfrente de las duchas? Well👀
Anda que ya podían haber redondeado hasta los 1000
Creo que ver eso es compatible con alegrarse, quien se alegre, que no voy a decirle a la gente cómo sentirse y menos en esto. Se acaba de inaugurar una época (aún más) oscura, y hay que mirar a eso a la cara.
Quiero decir, es pero no. El tema que a algunos nos trae de cabeza no es que sea Venezuela específicamente el país atacado; es que se ha atacado a un país y se ha secuestrado a su líder con pretextos que ni siquiera cuentan como excusa decente.
De acuerdísimo con no explicarles Venezuela a los venezolanos, a tope con eso porque es un atrevimiento fuerte, especialmente por aquellos de nosotros que no tenemos un conocimiento demasiado exhaustivo del tema. Ahora, es que no es el punto ese.
Espero que estés ya de vuelta en casa😥
No, hombre, esa habitación se ve bastante limpia
A ver por detrás, que si no no se puede opinar del todo
Lo veo y subo a mallas en vez de chándal 😜
EU citizens - especially those in Greenland - deserve a clear answer to the question of how EU leaders would react to attempts of the US to annex Greenland. Will there be a clear political and economic response? Or is it also going to be a "complex situation" to be "closely monitored"?
¡Gracias! Probaré a ver qué tal
¿Alguna recomendación en concreto?
Llevo unos días desvelándome y durmiendo regulero, ¿será que mi cuerpo ya está tenso por volver a trabajar el día 7?😔
Yo igual, me la descargué ayer😂
