Not if you want it to be correct. AI can't just replace research work.
10.03.2026 12:33
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Not if you want it to be correct. AI can't just replace research work.
Itβs tempting to play the NHSβ game of βLook, the evidence DOES support GAC!β but IMO thatβs a waste of time because it reinforces the idea that the NHS ought to be making decisions about our bodies for us.
If someone wants to change sex, at any age and for any reason, thatβs their business π€·ββοΈ
Yesterday the NHS banned all under 18 prescriptions of HRT for trans young people.
This ban was justified by 10 new studies that largely stated NO EVIDENCE for under 18s HRT exists.
The study underpinning this played one particular trick.
Let's briefly look at how the NHS rigged the game 1/5
I think they'll go for all after 25.
From mandatory ID cards to arresting pensioners for holding up cardboard signs to cosy deals with US tech spy firms:
It's good to see lawyers pushing back on their increasingly authoritarian Govenrment.
We must protect jury trials.
Given how I saw them respond to discovering v-coding I'm not surprised in the least they don't care about the victims there either. Truly some of the worst people I've ever encountered.
Attacking trans youth was his *first* priority in office. I'd say we should fire him into the sun, but he'd find a way to fuck the sun up too just to spite trans people.
Daily mail beware the green menace
Didn't expect Daily Mail to be doing free branding.
Lower bills, protect the NHS and fund public services.
Can imagine why Lord Rothermere isn't so keen....
Join.greenparty.org.uk
Who needs equal pay (or even the protection of the Equality Act apparently) as long as someone who once had a penis can't be in the stall next to them when they go to the toilet? π¬
It's fine, they can just get on the adult GIC waiting list and get them there
*Screams in CURRENTLY AT NINE AND A HALF YEARS WAITING TO SEE A GIC*
It's also time sensitive during puberty because of the added distress of experiencing your body changing in the "wrong" ways. I certainly have a lot of distress over my body now, but puberty was still much worse. If you can save someone that harm in the first place, well, prevention is better etc.
Because it sets them up for banning it private AND for adults.
Absolutely BEGGING news organizations to not accept the framing of "we accept them, they just have to be their assigned sex at birth for all purposes" as a win for trans people.
On International Womenβs Day a reminder that my Alice had a mother and a sister and grannies, aunts, girl friends and girl cousins.
They all loved her as a woman.
When the transphobes say they speak for all women and are protecting women and girls, they are wrong.
True that. Even before you get into people who can't vote.
"We saw that change in Gorton and Denton β and that result unlocked a new level of confidence for potential Green voters that they can truly vote for what they want and get it."
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
I still think that deep down most people are decent enough they'd be much better off in a decent society that made it easy and rewarding to be decent to everyone, but our society brings out and rewards all the worst things instead. Sadly most people aren't decent enough to be decent despite that.
I'd like to know what assumptions go into that algorithm and just how accurate it has been in past elections. My guess is it won't be very accurate in the next election unless it's actually doing it on a per seat basis which I assume it isn't. Like, that data isn't broken down per seat, right?
Have you ever heard of a generation that didn't say this about later generations? Famously this happened in ancient Greece even. Look at yourself; you've become the clueless old man who has no idea what's wrong, but knows it's all the kids' fault.
Seat projections are wild. 21%, 23%... More than double the seats. π€¦ββοΈ
Yeah it's bullshit that they charge you for getting content from other providers, but it is technically true you don't have to, at least for now. I totally agree they're overreaching by charging for all live broadcasting. I certainly wouldn't be sorry to see them go.
It affecting infertile people doesn't make it not eugenics, intentional or not.
Sure, but again I'm saying this isn't just as buzzwords because this is a thing that was thought up by and introduced by eugenicists because they thought it furthered their agenda. It's not just vaguely connected to eugenics, it's a product of eugenicist ideals.
These tests were still designed and championed by eugenicists because eugenicists saw them as furthering their goals. Eugenicists also lean heavily into authoritarianism. Things like this allow them tighter control. Patriarchy and eugenics are two sides of the same white supremacy coin.
That seems to easily fall within copyright exemptions. You can use short clips (usually less than 15 seconds is considered safe, but it needs to not be a substantial part of the work) without permission as long as your work is transformative. I don't think that's going to matter here at all.
Eugenics and patriarchy are not disconnected and sex testing in sports originated with eugenicists. Attributing it to eugenics isn't letting patriarchy off the hook.
It's been years and "sorry is a free action bitch" still lives rent free in my head. π Aabria!
The US starting an offensive war in Iran doesn't obligate anyone to join them. That's well established. The US keeps attacking other nations without NATO support all the damned time. Must have happened like a dozen times in my lifetime.
That seems entirely necessary. The sheer size of the power vacuum for other powers to step into if NATO were to start losing large members without a replacement is staggering. Like this sounds like Putin's wet dream.
