Kant (allegedly) says that if you cannot actually do the wrong thing you are not a moral agent. So if you cannot actually test if youβve been done wrong, does it matter if you trust? That would be faith. So trust AI or have faith in AI?
Kant (allegedly) says that if you cannot actually do the wrong thing you are not a moral agent. So if you cannot actually test if youβve been done wrong, does it matter if you trust? That would be faith. So trust AI or have faith in AI?
10% into The Object by Joshua T. Calvert. Bad writing.No clear idea. Done.Curse the algorithm that recommended it
CAST .. because old sins cast long shadows
I'm hiring again! Please share. I'm recruiting a postdoc research fellow in human-centred AI for scalable decision support. Join us to investigate how to balance scalability and human control in medical decision support. Closing date: 4 October (AEST).
uqtmiller.github.io/recruitment/
project applications will continue until morale improves
Maybe the issue is not that AI will kill us all. Maybe the issue is: it will not care about us
I just started Mordew. The beginning is not working for me, maybe there is a correlation :) let me know if you try
have I ever felt lonely? sure. has it ever occurred to me to take that talk to ChatGPT& its LLM cousins? Hell-no. Why?
The algorithm is a good servant but a bad master www.nrk.no/stor-oslo/ny...
As with many aspects of our digital lives, responsibility is too diffuse for accountability. www.theatlantic.com/technology/a...
Many congratulations to the three winners of the distinguished paper award at #IJCAI2025 @ijcai.org
aihub.org/2025/08/20/c...
English is not mother-language for most in academia. We could have used LLM to translate the mails in our native language we send and learn from the languages. instead we prompt LLM in english and send that drivel around. Same tech, different human choice
tldr: toss a coin to your library if you like the chatting AIs too much www.khrono.no/ingen-sannhe...
safety is optional
If you can prove, then you are not talking about trusting but knowing. www.newscientist.com/article/mg26...
I think this is wrong. You cannot sell what is your human right. At least you should not be able to. Tech or not.
We sold our privacy cheaply, creating surveillance billionaires in the process. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
In light of Meta-takes-your-messages-data a throwback to this excellent article scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol75/...
I have reached that stage where I read an old paper of mine and think: mhm this is actually rather a good idea
to tie you over, Starter Villain by John Scalzi
Suffering from the heat wave βοΈβοΈπ₯΅π₯΅? How about a nice postdoc in AI in Bergen, Norway π³π΄. Our summers are always cool πππ‘οΈ. Read the fine print!
www.jobbnorge.no/en/available...
Hashtag 25272 and 25271 Dagstuhl
I always thought smokers had the unfair advantage to be able to just go out and take a break in social situations. I will start using βI need to go and monitor the perimeterβ #murderbot
There is unethical use of AI and unethical lack of use of AI⦠like when you murder the room with powerpoint
i am pretty sure even chat gpt would not have gotten it this wrong
Former PM of Norway stated 4 days ago we should reduce teaching non useful subjects like humanities and social sciences π burn the kant weβve got too many πΆ
I am sorry, what? π₯Ή