I hated it so much at 16. So much. Total contempt from word one
I hated it so much at 16. So much. Total contempt from word one
Juno at 22: annoying movie, Jason Batemanβs heel turn is bizarre.
Juno at 38: actually devastating, also heβs clearly a manchild grooming her Jesus Christ.
Knocked Up at 22: Seth Rogenc is hilarious, sheβs gotta chill.
Knocked Up at 38: this man is an actual irresolute degenerate? Leave him?
Okay, a related question: works that hit one way when you were young, and then very differently when you were older? The standout here for me is the 2007 Pregnancy Movies: Juno and Knocked Up. Canβt think of movies where my feelings towards the characters shifted so much with time
if only that were true :(
This is also a great and relatable answer even though it doesnβt really bother me viscerally
There Will Be Blood
Hegseth appears to be literally high on power in a way Iβm not sure Iβve seen from any other military leader
Just huffing his own cringy propaganda
The best soldiers are the toughest soldiers. The toughest soldiers are the ones willing to massacre unarmed innocents without remorse.
Hegseth thinks way to be Good at Army is just go on camera and says the hardest thing you can think of, except heβs a sociopath and so he understands βsounding toughβ to mean βexplicitly describing your willingness to defy all moral and legal boundaries and murder people for no particular reasonβ
Remember how this guy lobbied hard to get a pardon for a war criminal who slaughtered children? Turns out thatβs literally his entire philosophy of armed conflict
But this gets it backwards, right? The challenge of the strait is not that you canβt get ships through, ships are going through right now. Itβs that you need a ton of ships to go through and pretty much 100% of them need to make it, because no insurer is going to gamble on a billion dollar loss
It has to be the most extraordinary feat of gaslighting in history
βI have no intention of starting a war with youβ I say as I airstrike your entire government into dust, sink your whole navy, destroy your air force, and demand your unconditional surrender
this just isnβt workable or practical
I street park
The age of the SUV is over
Now is the time of the Fit
βUnite the anti-Trump coalition | Easily winβ is a banger of a slogan tbh
The U.S. made this class of stunningly stupid, pudding-soft MAGA parasites who have managed to move through life without ever encountering genuinely meaningful pushback. This led them to starting this wildly dangerous war in Iran - and looks like their reality distortion field is no longer working.
Strategy is fundamentally all about developing a sophisticated theory of the mind of oneβs opponent.
With MAGAβs Iran Adventure, guess weβre going to see what a modern war almost totally devoid of anything weβd call βstrategyβ looks like.
βMAGAβs fundamental shared quality is a total lack of theory of mind for other peopleβ is a theory that keeps getting validated by reality - look at almost every decision theyβve made in the war with Iran, and how they seem constantly surprised by the unanticipated actions of other parties.
also, like, look at a map of Iran! Itβs all mountains! Just a whole country of mountains! Iβm not a military strategy expert but surely thatβs Bad For Invading, right?
but if they can sink a US warship why can we be sure they canβt sink a giant floating oil tank
Yeah again with the caveat that I am 0% knowledgeable about this sort of thing itβs really hard to see any non-political solution that isnβt βtotal conquest of Iran around the strait,β which a. will take a long time and make things worse until itβs done, and b. probably still doesnβt fully secure it
I mean is it even really true that you can keep Hormuz open if youβre willing to dump massive resources into it? You pretty much need a 100% success rate at intercepting any kind of attempted attack, right? Is that possible, if we canβt even protect our own guys in that area?
Ultimately the only way to make it safe is a political resolution where you can be relatively sure the Iranians wonβt shoot at the shipsβ¦ are we REMOTELY moving that way? Or perhaps the opposite way
The leap from βprotecting 5 shipsβ to βprotecting 100 shipsβ seems pretty significant! And they just have to get lucky once to truly bone the whole world.
And I know precisely zip about drones or ship defense or ocean shipping but it just seems obviously true that the closer you get to full traffic through the strait the harder everything gets to protect? If there are dozens of ships a day youβre just saturating the area with potential targets
This is what I canβt wrap my head around. People keep saying βOh itβll work itself outβ butβ¦ how? Give the ships wings? Destroy every drone in a hostile territory the size of the eastern US? Kill every living human within 100 miles of the strait?
No but it seems like crank nonsense
Honestly the key to making good predictions isnβt being especially smart but understanding that there isnβt some kind of invisible fencing around outcomes that prevents them from departing from the familiar. A car accelerating at a cliff edge will go over the edge if it doesnβt stop or turn