"We really need to talk about the threat to Israel from THE LEFT (field gap in coverage)"
09.03.2026 20:18
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
"We really need to talk about the threat to Israel from THE LEFT (field gap in coverage)"
there have been chicken wars in the fast food world for more than a decade
new Gettier case just dropped
By the time you've agreed to the interview, you're already cooked
I *wish* any Dems had Trump Derangement Syndrome!
Prepared casting rears its ugly head once again
"You can have fifty spell slots, sure, but you have to pick ahead of time exactly which 7±2 things you expect to want to be able to do today. Anything unexpected or off-script, you're plumb out of luck"
Depending on whether YouTube counts as social media (probably depends on how it's used), and how strictly one must be to eschew, arguably Bo Burnham?
I am so glad not to be the only one! Thank you!!
Certainly in the 'you're so changed, I'm treating you like a body-snatcher' context!
TVTropes mentions it here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwik...
but as related more to tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwik...
oh dear lord 😂
filed immediately under 'examples I hope not to have to include'
When you think about conjoined questions (of the form "X and Y?", where both X and Y are questions), as I'm sure you do, what examples come to mind?
The awning and neon sign of the aforementioned Pablo Discobar
firsthand evidence!
We just have to bring it here to them, just in case
the GOAT is now a lamb
(I do not know if they would endorse this, but it's possible that they would say)
it's just an accident of common parlance; lying by omission isn't actually lying per se
popular belief also that lying requires *assertion*
so it could be verbal, but still only be misrepresentation, not lying, if it only happened via presupposition, or [conventional implicature if you think that's not assertive, or] other non-assertive moves
do they mean, things which are biological but also plausibly abstract, or a kind? like a phenotype, or a species?
from 2017 but as relevant as ever
politicalresearch.org/2017/06/29/s...
once you see how antisemitism bubbles under the surface of white supremacy when it targets people of color, you don't get fooled into thinking you can be on the safe side of it
boiled tater tots as gnocchi 😧
fried gnocchi as tater tots 😍
the idea that it can "search for the actual details" is still so misleading!
one step forward, that same exact step backwards 🙃
all your favorite webcomics! still the best way to consume them (if that's a thing you do)
the world was simpler when the media bubbles were totally distinct
when conservatives would pretend not to understand what intersectionality meant
instead of learning the term "moral panic" and applying it to 'criticism of chumming around with a known child trafficker'
(meanwhile publishing Singal!)
sickos.jpg
Franke & de Jager 2011
I nominated -coded last year! The olds will catch on in 2028.
Weekend at Bernie's III just dropped
43.07/50 "Genuinely unsettling accuracy. Please find a hobby."
rude! (😎)
Fertile ground for a research project, expanding across languages, encompassing many different NP encoding strategies, to see if the hierarchy is indeed universal! (Got any spare grad students? :p)
Even if one were opposed to singular they.. just use "it", because IT'S A BEAR!
Is the issue then that you wish there were greater resolution (i.e., within the 'clitics' classification) on these scales?
Or are skeptical that they're accurate crosslinguistically?
Or that you want a description of the sem/prag prominence/salience scale which maps onto the accessibility hierarchy?