My comments yesterday for the Swiss TV on the listing of former Swiss intelligence officer Jacques Baud on the EU sanctions regime on π·πΊ hybrid threats (in French).
Interview de Jan Lepeu (vidΓ©o), ForumΒ - www.rts.ch/play/tv/redi...
My comments yesterday for the Swiss TV on the listing of former Swiss intelligence officer Jacques Baud on the EU sanctions regime on π·πΊ hybrid threats (in French).
Interview de Jan Lepeu (vidΓ©o), ForumΒ - www.rts.ch/play/tv/redi...
Warm thank you to the editors @drclaraportela.bsky.social , Andrea Charron and @mirkosossai.bsky.social for making it happen and stirring the process expertly
Publication alert π¨ : I'm glad to see that the Elgar Encyclopedia of International Sanctions is now available.
I have been entrusted with the contribution on the European Union as a Sanctions Taker πͺπΊ.
β‘οΈEuropean Union doi.org/10.4337/9781...
This is the crowing achievement of almost 5 years of research on history of EU sanctions under the supervision of Jeff Checkel and @stephofmann.bsky.social. A massive thank you as well to the two other jury members @drclaraportela.bsky.social and Niklas Bremberg.
I had the privilege this week of being awarded the title of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences from the @eui-eu.bsky.social after successfully defending my thesis on the EU sanctions policy.
I had the pleasure to appear in Jan Dunin-Wasowicz's podcast to discuss the past, present, and future of EU sanctions. Among other things: how the Russia sanctions differ from previous sanctions, where do EU sanctions come from, and how they have evolved over time.
open.spotify.com/episode/681O...
The first part of the discussion revisits some of the arguments made in my recently published article.
@eui-sps.bsky.social
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
I had the pleasure to appear in Jan Dunin-Wasowicz's podcast to discuss the past, present, and future of EU sanctions. Among other things: how the Russia sanctions differ from previous sanctions, where do EU sanctions come from, and how they have evolved over time.
open.spotify.com/episode/681O...
How to organize European security? In this International Politics forum, we discuss European actors' choices between orchestrating existing and new institutional layers (compartmentalized multilateralism) or escaping consensus-making with new&old layers @eui-sps.bsky.social @eui-schuman.bsky.social
π¨ New Year, New Publication:
For the upcoming International Politics Forum on the (re-)organising of European Security following the
π·πΊ invasion of πΊπ¦, I wrote this article focusing on the sanctions pillar of the πͺπΊ response to the full-scale invasion.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Big thank you to @stephofmann.bsky.social for organising the Forum, as well as to the editors of International Politics and the two very helpful anonymous reviewers.
Keep an eye out for the Forum, lots of very interesting contributions in there on the futur of European Security π
It's all very 'inside baseball' on how πͺπΊ foreign policy is done. But ultimately it's about power, about who gets to organise Europe's foreign and security policy and to what aim.
www.politico.eu/article/eu-g...
Big Q moving forward is wether it was :
(i) an exceptional reaction to an exceptional challenge
(ii) the latest iteration of a double trend of the de-targetization of EU sanctions and the increasing role of the Commission in EU foreign policy.
Or more bluntly put: the post Feb2022 de-targetization of EU's π·πΊ sanctions empowered the European Commission and its presidency, at the expense of the EEAS, the Council, and thus the Member States. Quite the departure from both existing practices and the spirit of the πͺπΊTreaties.
The gist of my argument is that the πͺπΊ turned this time to much more comprehensive forms of sanctioning (vs the very targeted sanctions we see in most EU sanctions regimes), and in doing so it changed the πͺπΊsanctions-making processes, and crucially who's in control.
The Forum investigates how the full-scale invasion of Ukraine changed the 'who', 'what' and 'in what way' of the European security architecture. My contribution looks more specifically at how the invasion of πΊπ¦ affected sanctions-making processes inside the πͺπΊ.
π¨ New Year, New Publication:
For the upcoming International Politics Forum on the (re-)organising of European Security following the
π·πΊ invasion of πΊπ¦, I wrote this article focusing on the sanctions pillar of the πͺπΊ response to the full-scale invasion.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Thanks, would love to be included
One of the reason we spend little on defense compare to the rest of the world is that whereas US/RUS/CHN defense spending is spent in the country (and partly on blue collar jobs), European πΆ often goes abroad.
Thus, most EU Defence spending is targeted towards collaborative projects across MS.
I think an important argument for EU spending on defense a bit overlooked here is: consolidate and integrate the European Defense Industrial Base (DIB).
Rightly or wrongly, EU defense spending is thought to try to tackle the fragmentation and bad inventive structure of European defense spending.
Mon intervention hier sur la RTS au sujet du Conseil europΓ©en et de la possibilitΓ© dβutiliser les revenus des avoirs gelΓ©s de la banque centrale russe pour financer lβaide militaire Γ lβUkraine.
Sommet de l'Union europΓ©enne sur l'Ukraine: interview de Yann Lepeu, ForumΒ -Β www.rts.ch/play/tv/redi...