Renee DiResta

Under Secretary ... This is a great complement to @X's community notes system, which results in less "reach" (thus monetization) for content annotated as inaccurate. You don't need a Ministry of Truth to incentivize truth online. Nikita Bier & @nikitabier • Mar 3 Today we are revising our Creator Revenue Sharing policies to maintain authenticity of content on Timeline and prevent manipulation of the program.

Happy to see Sarah Rogers, who was lying in a hearing yesterday ab Stanford Internet Observatory being part of a cabal of Stasi NGOS (what?), come out in support of my past argument ab “freedom of speech not freedom of reach” & the importance of supplementing CN w/ incentives. Glad we agree, Sarah!

Sayer Ji is the GreenMedInfo nut who was married to women’s wellness nut Kelly Brogan.

Ji is currently a try-hard trying to get Imran Ahmed deported, too.

Someone needs to explain this to Elon Musk too tbh

Yeah I don’t really understand the point of those stunts either tbh except perhaps showing skeptics that it’s capable of a lot more than they might think? For reproducibility those sorts of things could bc interesting.

I have avoided this debate aside from reading the Substacks bc I’m not really part of the academy in the way you all are but “the peer-reviewed journal article as a primary unit of academic production is indeed probably dead” — I do believe this is true. And AI is a useful tool for subtasks atm.

This list and more at eipartnership.net/report

His account didn’t get taken down. His tweets stayed up. Did they get labeled? Maybe, I don’t care enough to go look atm. But a label isn’t censorship — that’s also more speech.

When MAGA says “free speech” they mean for them, to lie, without the bare minimum of pushback. Everyone sees that now.

She also said she used to be Charlie Kirk’s lawyer 👀 & that we put him on a “censorship list”.

No, sweetheart. We made a list of top bullshitters in the 2020 election AFTER the election, by looking at who spread what rumors. Your boy was on it. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Pointing that out isn’t “censorship” it’s speech.

Under Secretary ... This is a great complement to @X's community notes system, which results in less "reach" (thus monetization) for content annotated as inaccurate. You don't need a Ministry of Truth to incentivize truth online. Nikita Bier & @nikitabier • Mar 3 Today we are revising our Creator Revenue Sharing policies to maintain authenticity of content on Timeline and prevent manipulation of the program.

Happy to see Sarah Rogers, who was lying in a hearing yesterday ab Stanford Internet Observatory being part of a cabal of Stasi NGOS (what?), come out in support of my past argument ab “freedom of speech not freedom of reach” & the importance of supplementing CN w/ incentives. Glad we agree, Sarah!

Mark Twain, yeah? Ben Franklin. Or Lincoln.

Tarot TikToker must pay $10M to professor she accused in Moscow murders, jury says A judge had already decided the tarot card reader was guilty of defamation. On Friday, a jury decided how much she owes in damages.

Good. More of this.

www.idahostatesman.com/news/northwe...

The NYT is too afraid of offending conspiratorial populist freeloaders to use plain language.

They have religious exemptions. That means the parents are liars, tbc, because no major religions object to vaccines…but they do usually have moral objections to lying!

People lying ab their religion are putting other people’s kids & the broader community at risk in schools w/21% MMR uptake rates.

On February 22, 2026, Naval Ravikant tweeted: "If you're unwilling to defend your country in time of war, then you're a tourist, not a citizen." As of March 3, 2026, the tweet has been deleted.

deleted his tweet as soon as an actual war popped off

Tillis: You decided to kill that dog because you had not invested the appropriate time in training it, and then you have the audacity to say it’s a leadership lesson. You killed a goat and said it was behaving badly. You’re a farmer — you don’t castrate a goat, they behave badly.

Did you read the article you shared? Idk I thought it was obvious why this is Bad Actually.

What do you think the winner’s opinion on J6 is?

Lmfao the guy who isn’t an election denier and wasn’t endorsed by Trump lost.

This is one of the stupidest posts I’ve seen on this site in a while. Why do you think he lost, exactly? What do you think is going to happen next?

What if we rebranded "pasteurization" as a cleanse for your raw milk and "fluoridation" as supplements for your water?

My pinned tweets on Threads

Nobody ever said a popular front would be fun

This was the top post when I opened insta this morning and I was like well you know avs getting mogged I’ll take it

Update: it’s under the fridge. Alll the way under, behind a random kid’s toy.

It is under the fridge!

Honestly she’s never taken anything important it’s usually hair elastics and interchangeable things. 🫠 Or stuffies that are bigger and findable.

Twins

Tried under the fridge and under the stove…

A very bad black cat sitting in a box.

I got myself 3 little brooches for my bday. I really only wanted *one*—which I’d hunted for a year— but I was like, seller has good deals, why not. Treat yourself.

I left them on the counter overnight. Cats decided they were toys. The one I wanted has now been MIA for 24 hours. She hides things. 🫠

I think bluesky would be roughly 300% better if people here were capable of reading “this is an assessment of the empirical reality of a situation” without assuming it comes with an implicit “and therefore I endorse the reality of that situation”

Yup. Iran and Saudi Arabia regularly ran influence operations against each other. We wrote about those too.