H@l Inc@nd3nz@

Words have no inherent meaning.

I spent part of my afternoon rehabbing a client who denied she’d ever received training. She ultimately agreed a formal meeting was held where management conveyed its expectation that she’d report [such circumstances].

Even if it gets built it will be locked 99% of the time, except when a local “non-profit” that runs a pay-to-play program has scheduled events.

Upon further reflection it’s a perfect encapsulation of the soul-sucking shittiness of everything Trump: purely evil motives implemented without a even hint of sophistication or nuance.

JFC. If you wrote this as fiction an editor would say the villainy is too cartoonish to be believable.

The service I use comes with hyperlinks to the cases cited. I by no means mean to say I’ve never read those sources and raised an eyebrow as to whether the cited material supported the conclusion drawn— but is it a better starting point than keywords.

I generally agree with the premise that it is far, far away from replacing me or anyone else. It’s a tool, which needs judgement and discretion to be wielded effectively.

I would never ask AI to draft my brief but it’s far superior to asking an intern to find me 6-8 cases in this circuit which stand for [proposition I know to be true, but don’t have a cite for.]

As a person who does not generally purchase or consume pop music made in the last 15 years it would be strange indeed if the SB halftime show was designed to target my musical tastes.

This is what social media is for!

I had lost track of the GOT spinoffs in the works after HOTD failed to captivate me. I was only moderately interested in AKtSK when I put it on last night responding to internet buzz. 4 episodes later, we are so f*cking back.

It’s always absurd. You didn’t dig out your car as a public service, you did so because you needed to use your car. That doesn’t entitle you to return hours later and reclaim the same spot. Thank you for coming to TED Talk.

One way to read this is tacit acknowledgment that the issues are philosophical/roster construction.

It’s not necessarily insane to keep the coach if you’re convinced the coach isn’t the issue—even if it’s insane to expect different results without addressing what *is* the problem.

Sure. I’m just saying the last thing I care about is the feelings of credentialed media members or whether or not they enjoyed covering an individual.

If your objection to honoring the most successful football coach in modern history is “he wasn’t nice” you may not understand the purpose of a Hall of Fame.

Fun fact: qualified immunity applies to state actors facing 1983 claims. Section 1983 doesn’t apply to federal agents at all.

Further evidence the PB is a joke.

I said what I said 🤷‍♂️

If only I had logged into Bluesky *before* I cajoled 12 to turn off his switch and watch a movie with me.

In any event, I wasn’t proposing the NFL generally thinks highly of Steno. My point was: he was in the room that developed the gameplans for Willis in GB.

That doesn’t mean he=Matt, any more than Barry=Fangio but it is *some* evidence he knows how to use Willis specifically.

I was with you 100% buuuut couldn’t the argument be made that Stenavich, more than anyone other than MLF, knows how to maximize Willis? He was unplayable before he arrived in GB.

I was with you 100% buuuut couldn’t the argument be made that Stenavich, more than anyone other than MLF, knows how to maximize Willis? He was unplayable before he arrived in GB.

Actually, trading your best players is smart.

Everyone knows about the dropped R’s, but understanding when and how they reappear is the true key to the accent.

On a per-FGA basis, only Lucas Havrisik … [has] been worse over the past two seasons than [Narveson.]

Couldn’t help but notice this nugget in the second paragraph. 😂

One final point: there is no “tie”here. This is, at best, sequential possession.

The ball was unequivocally in the offensive player’s hands only first. Whether you believe the defensive player took it away from him before the receiver was touched down is a different thing entirely.

Not a Bills fan-I really don’t care.

The NFL’s “catch” officiating makes less sense with each passing year. I was not surprised by this ruling; it’s completely asinine; in other words: par for the course.

That would have at least had the appearance of conviction.

They’ve been twisting in the wind all week because the reality is actually: we don’t want the instability of a new coach but we want the flexibility to cut bait in 2 years.

They’re not convinced—they just know they don’t want to pay up.

What’s happening here is you’re illustrating my point that this “negotiation” is about saving face more than bringing him back.

They get no credit for that from me. If they wanted to fire him because he wasn’t the guy they should have done it Monday morning.

Alright man. I’m all set.

At this point we’re just speculating about what might have happened and what they’re probably thinking & it’s just 4D chess built on sand.

Their statement preceded the game, which preceded the player’s comments on Monday.

To the extent you can’t say you’ve lost faith in a coach you might bring back you also can’t say you want your coach back & mean “only at a discount because you’re an underachiever” without some segment of the public believing you cheaped out.

Consider me “some segment of the public.”

Were they required to publicly state they wanted to bring him back, regardless of the outcome, before the playoffs or did they choose to?