Blake Emerson's Avatar

Blake Emerson

@blakeprof

Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. Administrative law, political theory. Author: The Public’s Law. Personal views only. https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/blake-emerson

13,849
Followers
2,194
Following
3,155
Posts
25.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Blake Emerson @blakeprof

Post image

This book rips.

07.03.2026 02:25 👍 16 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 1

How many USAID’s have we spent on the Iran war so far?

07.03.2026 01:39 👍 22 🔁 9 💬 0 📌 0

Unconditional surrender an sich/fuer sich

06.03.2026 19:58 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

New kind of false consciousness just dropped.

06.03.2026 19:58 👍 15 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0
Post image

Our government has absolutely no idea what it’s trying to do with this war.

06.03.2026 19:49 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I mean having AI write the text of the article in whole or substantial part. I’m fine with people using AI for research purposes as long as it’s disclosed.

06.03.2026 01:47 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Suppose for the sake of argument that AI could write a law review article better than the professor. Regardless, the professor will be a worse scholar and teacher because they did not do the work of writing the article.

06.03.2026 01:43 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Significant political blow to the administration. Good.

05.03.2026 19:00 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

“But I can write 500 articles a year with AI prompts!” Great, they will be littered with hallucinations and errors and no one will read them except a judge who needs a cite for the error of law he wants to commit.

05.03.2026 18:26 👍 21 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0

If you feel the need to write articles using AI, please find another job. Your students and colleagues deserve a lot better.

05.03.2026 18:25 👍 215 🔁 32 💬 9 📌 4

Yes.

05.03.2026 18:15 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

On the plus side, you’ve kept your integrity as a scholar and produced real research

05.03.2026 18:02 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🫠

05.03.2026 18:01 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Pleased to share my forthcoming article on birthright citizenship, based on 7 days of in depth Google searches and only a handful of basic conceptual errors.

05.03.2026 17:23 👍 87 🔁 12 💬 9 📌 2
Post image

This seems like one of those “let’s see if these still work” situations. Like Trump saying he’s going to build new battleships. WWII cosplay but it’s real and we’re the aggressors.

04.03.2026 21:53 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

We illegally renamed the Department of Defense the “Department of War” but the thing with the bombs and the killing we are doing with all our “warfighters” is NOT a war.

04.03.2026 19:36 👍 15 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 1

Coping by reading about seventeenth century English legal history.

04.03.2026 17:15 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Not singling out this guy’s head. Really any head. Cut it out.

04.03.2026 16:13 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

I’m not sure what the nyt thinks I want a large head talking directly at me when I go to their homepage.

04.03.2026 16:12 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0

The scary thing about a prediction market is that people with little information can randomly make a catastrophic event marginally more likely.

04.03.2026 06:20 👍 14 🔁 6 💬 0 📌 0

We used to be a proper country.

04.03.2026 06:17 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

When is the last time someone made an LA noir TV show?

04.03.2026 06:16 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 5 📌 0

I don’t disagree, just observing the politics of the situation beyond Trump’s personal whim. No doubt Khamenei was a tyrant.

03.03.2026 06:31 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

This seems like a very long way of publicly saying that we don’t have adequate munitions to keep this up for long.

03.03.2026 06:24 👍 24 🔁 5 💬 5 📌 1

The thing about the Iran war is this is not just a Trump thing. Remember McCain “bomb bomb Iran?” There are also (small) domestic constituencies that have an understandable personal animosity to the regime. Plus “grand strategy.” It seems like the fruition of longer running trends rather than “MAGA”

03.03.2026 04:19 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

“Maybe we can blame this on Haitian trans professors?”

02.03.2026 18:49 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Haven’t heard much from JD Vance on our latest forever war.

02.03.2026 18:48 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

People asking me a lot of questions already answered by my “US not veering into a new endless war” shirt.

02.03.2026 16:50 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Sure hope the US doesn’t have any actual defense needs while we’re expending our limited weapons stockpile and resources (and killing kids in school apparently) in a war of choice.

02.03.2026 16:34 👍 17 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0

It’s also an argument for regulating tech and breaking up monopolies. The problem of concentrated power exists in many spaces. In my view, regulatory agencies and public universities are duly constrained as is. Large financial interests, the presidency, and law enforcement agencies are not.

02.03.2026 16:22 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0