No, that absolutely makes sense!
@yarns-and-d20s
elder millennial enby | crocheter | writer | swamp witch | paladin enthusiast | autism- & ADHD-powered yapping: games, books, moral panics, censorship, FE3H (Dimilix), VLD (Sheith), BG3 (OCs, Bloodweave), Skyrim, Hades https://linktr.ee/yarnpenguin
No, that absolutely makes sense!
Bestie @shadowcanuck.bsky.social replied to my post about how insidious loneliness is and I am both of the people she describes in this this somehow:
π be sure to take care of you.
i obviously am distressed by the news but also: do not comply in advance
the number one response to fascistic bullshit is "Fuck you, make me" 100% of the time
The patriarchy teaches boys that being a man means to be disconnected from your emotions because theyβre βfeminineβ and femininity is bad
The patriarchy teaches girls that being a woman means to suffer and to hate everything about yourself
This is unnatural and needs to change
Everyone has different lines for "unacceptable content". That's the issue here. Even the most vanilla shit will gross somebody out.
When you've got figures in government who feel that gay and trans people just existing is inherently pornographic and inappropriate, there is no nuance to be had
I legit said this on my alt like this fascist government calls the existence of trans people NSFW. Your line in the sand isn't even remotely close to theirs
The whole point of defending the right for uncomfortable, or even reprehensible fiction to have the right to exist isnt that its all cool and nothing is ever wrong with it
Its that government/corpo organizations will NEVER look at things with the """nuance""" you think is so self evident
The only hardline is whether someone is *actually* hurting someone else irl. Feeling grossed out/offended is not the same as getting hurt and assuming someone is dangerous from the fiction they consume is cop shit. Thought Crimes are a fascist concept, censorship is a tool of oppression.
could be. I'd rather the people who think any amount of sex don't even see it when they filter out E-rated works, even if it does leave people looking for actual smut being like "is that it?" Tags and author's note both reflect that literally only 2% of the short word count is sex scene.
the difference is nebulous and strange and depends on which way the wind is blowing somehow
It's such a fine line and I don't really understand it. Probably best to make it so that people who don't want anything even resembling smut don't see it, and leave smut-seekers high and (heh) dry.
It's possible they are, but at the end of the day I think I'd rather leave smut-seekers feeling disappointed than jumpscare people who don't want a whiff of smut in their day.
I was kinda leaning in to making it seem like the textual version of an R-rated movie scene, actually!
But I'm gonna lean cautious here; I'd rather cater to the sensibilities that just filter out explicit works and leave smut-seekers a note that they'll probably be disappointed.
I've just put in both the tags and summary that (literally--used a calculator and everything) only 2% of the word count is sex scene.
I don't want people who are looking for smut to be disappointed, but also I don't want people who *don't* want smut to be jumpscared! If I'm going to cater to one group I'd rather be cautious and cater to people who filter out E-rated works because they don't want even a whiff of explicit sex.
When using Microsoft Word or Google Docs, don't just make text bigger and bolder to make it a heading. That will work for sighted users, but screen reader users will miss that and just hear it as normal paragraph text. Use actual heading styles, like level 1 through 6.
I just don't want to jumpscare anybody with graphic content.
Dimitri is hot and wet and tight. He makes the most delicious and delightful sounds as Felix takes him, mewling and whimpering and moaning all the while as Felix works tirelessly to sate them both. Dimitriβs scent is so thick in the air that Felix can taste it. They were meant for each otherβno, made for each otherβand finally giving in is a bliss that Felix never knew could possibly exist. One that he doesnβt think he will be strong enough to resist in the future.
And, I mean, I'm saying all of this, but if you haven't read it, this is the entire sex scene. This one paragraph. There's no on-page violence except for Felix pinning Sylvain to a wall.
If opened an "explicit" fic and this was all there was...? I'm probably thinking too hard about this.
Like, I don't use the words "hole," "cock," or "slick" at all. I don't describe any tab As going into any slot Bs. To be fair, the word "ass" is used a lot, but there's no description of anything sexual actually happening to one, unless you count a throwaway line about Seteth's ass getting pinched.
Hey Dimilix side of fandom, if you read my omegaverse fic "Surrender": I received a comment that it should be rated explicit. While I do make it clear that sex happened, it's not at all detailed. If I was looking for explicit omegaverse and read "Surrender" I think I'd be disappointed. Thoughts?
anyway so I still miss Jack Layton a lot
boo :(
They should still get sued into the fucking ground, you shouldnβt get to βwhoops sorryβ your way out of this
Friends, this is the music currently playing while I'm on hold for my pharmacy:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEHQ...
which is something we shouldn't have to do at all!
YEP
Webp images are part of enshittification, if you ask me. Makes it harder to save images properly and to share them!
Hey so I think the NDP saying that there should be a byelection if an MP crosses the floor, may be not the way things work here? Because I believe with the Westminster system (what we have), the seat belongs to the specific Member of Parliament, not the party. We elect the Member. That's it. Yeah?
If anyone is willing the share the following, I would be so grateful!
We just launched Piece by Piece on Steam ππ
It's a cozy repair shop sim, you play a woodland fox who inherits his grandfather's store. You fix up items with your hammer and paintbrush π¨ποΈπ¦
store.steampowered.com/app/3179050/...
how do we get bluesky to give us the jpgs and pngs back