🎙️AI and Mental Health: Alberto Giubilini joins Michele De Prisco on the Brains On Brains podcast from @ecnp.eu
Can AI act as a moral advisor in psychiatry? What consent and equity dilemmas do we face? Should we fear or embrace these tools?
youtu.be/1b-azyBd3A8?...
#ethics #mentalhealth #AIEthics
Ah interesting, thanks. Some sort of dispositional account seems right to me, so I'm keen to see their arguments against it
There's a dispositional account in the vicinity that seems to get around that objection. Do they discuss it? (I should just read the paper...)
Illustration showing a graduation ceremony, with speaker addressing graduates: “Let the example of my fluke success guide nearly all of you to crushing disappointment”.
Success in academia often has more to do with luck, patronage and the job market than “hard work”.
Good academics acknowledge this.
I worked hard, but I was in the right place at the right time on occasion. Historians far more talented than I have fallen between the cracks.
Continuum hypothesis in shambles
That neuroscientist was *so* confident that philosophy was antequated nonsense, just like this neuroscientist. And yet they ridiculed opposing views. (Though I think in both cases they didn't really understand what their target was saying.)
Neuroscience needs more philosophy.
In grad school, I saw a philosopher give a talk about mental representations to an interdisciplinary audience. The first question in Q&A was a rude and dismissive comment from a neuroscientist who mocked the idea that anyone would bother talking about representations when studying the brain.
the links only work in a nearby possible website
A thought- could it be that there's an implicit goal of providing a reductive account of the constructed category, and an assumption that you'd need this other property to provide that reduction? Not to endorse the assumptions, but I wonder if this is going on in the background
One problem is we focus implicitly on truth as an exercise of the authority of sovereign knowers, to the exclusion of truth as something we owe to others. Perhaps the current condition is not so much 'post-truth' (as there's plenty of truth-claims being asserted) as 'truth without truthfulness.'
The nicest thing an analytic philosopher can say to another analytic philosopher
There's a bluesky "philosophical underclass" feed, but it seems not to have caught on yet
bsky.app/profile/did:...
Maybe it's taken a liking to shrimp
you have to be limber if you want to demonstrate an illusion of amodal completion with your body
It seems inevitable, though maybe not as a bias in the model so much as hidden cues in prompts. Google could easily feed Adsense data into prompts as a low-tech method. Sorta surprising we haven't seen it yet
nozick uses the term in philosophical explanations, so i'd guess johnston picked it up there. dunno if it was used earlier
Psychedelics as moral bioenhancers: Protocol for a scoping review of arguments for and against
So now we have a "Philosophical Underclass" feed that collects posts with #philosophicalunderclass. Let's see how this goes.
bsky.app/profile/did:...
#philsky
Newer models allow users to upload pdfs
I'm only seeing blue ones, but maybe the descriptions here will give you clues
www.etsy.com/listing/1314...
www.etsy.com/listing/1536...
www.etsy.com/ca/listing/1...
Thanks for making this. Addition: bsky.app/profile/bria...
In 2010, anti-copyright activist Aaron Swartz hanged himself after being prosecuted to the full extent of the law for making copyrighted academic publications freely available. Today, academic publishers are insisting those copyrights be lifted to feed the corporate AI slop machine.
oh thank god
Hello Bluesky!
Please connect with me if you are interested in #AI #moralpsychology #privacy and related topics :)
yeah, i suppose it's just a more sophisticated modeling technique. I agree it won't be useful for genuinely new psychology without validating on humans
I think it would depend on how novel the new cases are. I imagine there could be a range of moderate novelty cases where replicas prove useful, like polling and other kinds of preference metrics
Here's a feed that does 1 and 3 but not so good at 2. Draws from across arxiv, SSRN, philpapers and a few other domains. bsky.app/profile/did:...
I like your way of thinking about it. The AI is a proxy for how others may interpret your decision in your shoes, and maybe it's very rough evidence about what you should do. Re privacy, let's stipulate that the information would be totally secure, even if that's unrealistic
If you could teach an AI about your life, personality, and values, would you consult it on big decisions? Why or why not?
Posting for posterity
#WhenTaken #269 (22.11.2024)
I scored 922/1000👑
1️⃣📍589 km - 🗓️2 yrs - 🥇180/200
2️⃣📍6.6 km - 🗓️5 yrs - 🥇195/200
3️⃣📍532 km - 🗓️3 yrs - 🥇181/200
4️⃣📍162 m - 🗓️6 yrs - 🥇193/200
5️⃣📍146 km - 🗓️12 yrs - 🥈173/200
whentaken.com
