Though I guess I don't hear ST Online people complaining about it, so...
09.03.2026 16:04
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Though I guess I don't hear ST Online people complaining about it, so...
Much love to those games but I'm not sure the "cutting a swath of violence through unending hordes of baddies" element of those games would be a great fit with Star Trek.
You know what other city still doesn't have water?
Ah yes I remember Tammy Duckworth's Nazi tattoo scandal and Ted Lieu's misogynist posts.
Are these people really so stupid they don't know we already have a ton of veterans in office?
the whole thing is just super dumb; like, he knew what it was, either when he got it or shortly after, he knew for years and didn't bother to get it covered, this is all completely obvious and any argument to the contrary is just an insult to our intelligence
What home? She's been squatting in a Coast Guard property, remember?
That's what you love to see in an already contentious candidate. Small seemingly irrelevant inconsistencies in their story.
No one mentioned moral high ground. Again a good reason to not treat this like a video game and conflate "defender" and "moral high ground." Who was the defender in the Normandy Invasion? Does that imply *they* had the moral high ground?
Or Fort Sumter, for that matter?
Life isn't a video game where belligerents in a war can always be easily slotted into "attacker" and "defender" but that said not one of you has heard of Peal Harbor?
The quiet, harmless little country that just SNAPPED one day.
Sorta feels like the kind of thing you should do BEFORE you start a war with timing that is entirely of your own choosing.
If anyone *literally* can, he can.
Pick one, they're all the same book.
About time we got ourselves one of those face-eating leopards I've heard so much about!
Yes I do absolutely.
The bad Naomi isn't the bad Naomi because she's wrong a lot she's the bad Naomi because she's clownshoes insane.
"This guy seems on the level and apparently I haven't been following very closely" is not the same thing as "This guy is a direct descendant of ancient Atlantians destined to lead us into the Age of Aquarius."
Look the rhyme still holds. Normal people have bad takes all the time. You don't get "Oh buddy, oof" until your takes are coming from Neptune.
Also, you all gotta settle on your retcon because it’s fifty percent the perfidious liberal establishment foisted this monster on us and fifty percent he’s as pure as the driven snow and it‘s all a ratfucking op on here.
Literally yes but not one that you or I are supposed to be "in on" or find funny.
And we all know what it looks like if you just have Vader express his emotions out loud instead
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIAY...
While also serving a secondary purpose of acting as an intro, repeat, payoff triad demonstrating his own emotional state of mind when he fails to kill Piett. Which is itself pretty important since it's hard to communicate a character's emotions when they don't have a face.
...a metaphor that should be pretty obvious when you know that by the end of the movie he'll have gone "btw I'm your dad. Isn't that great? Aren't you excited to have a dad?"
Second of all Vader killing his subordinates isn't meant to demonstrate that he's a good leader it's meant to demonstrate that he's an abusive psychopath who reacts to the failures (real or imagined) of those in his charge with extreme discipline and total lack of grace or forgiveness...
First of all, in Star Wars when ships come out of hyperspace they literally go "Boom" so obviously the issue is Ozzel came out of hyperspace close enough for the Rebels on Hoth to hear them coming.
