maroider's Avatar

maroider

@maroider.net

70
Followers
197
Following
10
Posts
28.07.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by maroider @maroider.net

People desperately want a solution to high housing prices that does not require building new homes in their neighborhoods. No such solution exists. If we want lower rents and home prices, we need to build more homes in the places people want to live. Anyone who says otherwise is bullshitting you.

24.02.2026 18:50 👍 228 🔁 49 💬 7 📌 0
Post image

@matt.godbolt.org I have to admit I was a little sceptical about the dark green color, but I like how it looks IRL

23.01.2026 16:17 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1

It was a fun talk to watch. It's exactly in the intersection if things I'd like to know about eventually, things that seem to be poorly documented, and things I'm not in a hurry to figure out on my own.

19.01.2026 16:38 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Configuring nextest - cargo-nextest Configuring nextest: information about profiles and hierarchical configuration.

All Git repository tool configuration files (CI, issue template, etc.) should go in to `.config` like Cargo Nextest: nexte.st/docs/configu...

Currently we have .gitlab, .config, .cargo, ..., and it creates clutter.

12.01.2026 17:47 👍 14 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 3
a variation of the "we should improve society somewhat." vs "yet you participate in society. very curious! i am very intelligent." sketch with the heckler's quotes replaced by the xkcd standards comic

a variation of the "we should improve society somewhat." vs "yet you participate in society. very curious! i am very intelligent." sketch with the heckler's quotes replaced by the xkcd standards comic

29.12.2025 00:55 👍 456 🔁 98 💬 6 📌 6

What's going on with the text in the middle panel?

21.12.2025 11:35 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I was thinking Surely<T> could implement Deref<Target=T> and DerefMut, and just panic if you deref it when it's None.

03.12.2025 13:34 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Very cool. I've always figured that proper graphics drivers would be a bit of a pain for any new OS.

03.12.2025 07:03 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Surely<T>

03.12.2025 05:54 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Do you host your own?

24.11.2025 18:59 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Dr. Barr from the TOP FUCKNG ROPE

20.11.2025 18:55 👍 578 🔁 169 💬 1 📌 0

The timing on this couldn't have been better. Turns out I needed to export an accessible PDF from my Typst project tonight to hit a deadline. You guys saved me from a lot of trouble. Please forward my appreciation to whoever got it implemented <3

10.10.2025 20:47 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

No worries. I would still say that the extra required import is awkward and it can hurt discoverability. I'm not entirely sold on this particular RFC's proposed solution, but I still think it's valuable to attach non-overridable methods to a trait in some form.

08.10.2025 20:59 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

`impl<T: Trait> T {}` isn't valid Rust. What the RFC refers to as an existing alternative is extension traits, which would be `impl<T: Trait> ExtTrait for T {}`. `impl dyn Trait` also only works on trait objects which is awkward.

08.10.2025 18:06 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0