They weren't in Iran. They were in bases elsewhere in the Middle East that were attacked by Iran.
09.03.2026 23:22
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
They weren't in Iran. They were in bases elsewhere in the Middle East that were attacked by Iran.
Admitting to war crimes because "they are fun."
Yeah, but I want to see numbers, not intuitions or hunches.
Trump wanted regime change in Iran and he got it. The new one is even worse.
Be careful what you wish for.
Particularly among men—I'd be curious to see the numbers broken down by both gender and party, to see what the CPC bros think of him.
Our church takes over a Laundromat once a month... washing drying clothes for free
providing detergent ... just about anything we can do to help
"U.S. soldiers leave Iran"? There are no ground troops in Iran (yet). It's been an air operation so far.
After the renaming of the Department of Defense seems odd that the GOP would be so coy about using the word
I suspect you could replace "India" with almost any other country in the world and this observation would still hold true
I love this time of year when sunrise races northward along the horizon
Lectionary readings today are about water. In the Anglican Communion cycle of prayer we pray today for the Episcopal Churches of Jerusalem and the Middle East.
Juxtaposed with the unfathomable evil of attacks on water plants.
“Pete Hegseth is a very dangerous person. He’s a white Christian nationalist and has the arsenal of the United States government at his disposal and a permission slip from President Trump to deploy carnage wherever he wishes against whomever he wishes.” www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
When I see people arguing that the problem with the war is that gas will be more expensive, or that Johnny Public doesn't like it, then I feel like they don't understand what the problem is with this war.
Right, because sound is what happens in our brains when waves hit our ears. The waves themselves are not sounds.
When will Americans who still know right from wrong rise up to end this madness?
There's something deeply obscene and broken about the fact that Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are bombing elementary schools in an illegal war of aggression, and there's still a sense among the opposition that it has to be explained in terms of gas prices in order to get American voters to care.
Lucifer has a point
These are not just places on a map. Innocent people, including children, are being injured and killed, their homes and neighbourhoods are being destroyed.
It's not about the tariffs. We are boycotting US products and travel because of the threats to our sovereignty.
Me, dumb and politically correct: Firing on unarmed ships or double-tap military strikes on schools are bad things.
So you're at the acceptance stage of grief
What to know before asking an AI chatbot for health advice apnews.com/article/chat...
"If you’re having worrisome symptoms, skip AI"
"...approach AI programs with 'a degree of healthy skepticism.'"
Chatbots "often stumble when interacting with humans."
Sure, but the possibility remains that Canada would be called upon to defend a treaty ally. And thus we can't say that Canada would never under any circumstances become involved.
Well, I won't quibble about probabilities, as neither Middle East politics nor statistics is my specialty. But the point is, future Canadian involvement can't be categorically ruled out given our treaty obligations (among other considerations), so it's pointless to ask the PM to say never.
I saw the title before reading the post and thought it was about golf.
I question your "in all likelihood" — there are other plausible scenarios involving Turkey that don't require US complicity.
What if, for example, Turkey, a NATO ally, is attacked and invokes Article 5?
Just thinking about what we could do with a billion dollars a day that doesn’t include bombing people.