johnnyicarus's Avatar

johnnyicarus

@marinaeschba.ch

I try to make good websites and applications with the help of a broader philosophical and historical perspective on technology. Consulting available at formwerdung.ch, writing at marinaeschbach.ch

61
Followers
271
Following
63
Posts
07.08.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by johnnyicarus @marinaeschba.ch

Fucked up a perfectly good transformer-based translation engine, look at him, he's got anxiety

06.03.2026 15:20 πŸ‘ 43 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

"It’s been a while, so quote this skeet with your favourite $20 dollar word."

autochtone

03.03.2026 21:22 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's more efficient b/c you don't actually have to throw it away! Synergy!

02.03.2026 09:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Important to note that the difference between a design prototype crafted by hand with HTML, CSS (what I aim for and like I believe @set.studio offers) and a vibe coded prototype is that you can actually use the code from the first one for the final product.

02.03.2026 09:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I am currently writing down my thoughts on coding with agents, and yeah that feels like a great one-sentence summary of the first 1000 words

01.03.2026 10:14 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

So you save time with relatively terse instruction but the parrot still behaves

21.02.2026 11:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes after dabbling I am pretty confident most of the reason why LLMs seem better at code is clever product engineering around the model.

All the "context" (tool calls, mcp, skills) constructs a prompt for you that's much more likely to get you the output you want

21.02.2026 11:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

From a discussion in RISF based on the old IBM adage, an updated version for the modern era:

19.02.2026 15:41 πŸ‘ 50 πŸ” 20 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

Nice

16.02.2026 18:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I feel the same way, I sometimes see this floating around as advice for "semantic" styling, but in effect you're tightly coupling HTML semantics and visual meaning, with the effect that every project of even moderate size has to overwrite 80% of its heading styles.

16.02.2026 14:52 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

We should do a contest with a panel of judges scoring who can get the most sycophancy out of it

14.02.2026 15:15 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Well sometimes I use this to be polite when I really want to say "I don't want to build this because it is bad design qua design and will make the product worse" (such is my arrogance) but point taken that I should find a better way to say this

10.02.2026 21:24 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

But also Apple's fault for hiring someone with the completely wrong profile

04.02.2026 17:25 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh definitely, I missed that post the first time around!

04.02.2026 17:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The fun bit about this is that he was allegedly poached, not fired

04.02.2026 13:29 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ”₯

"So, if 'pixel perfection' is no longer a viable goal, what should we be striving for? The answer, I believe, lies in shifting our focus from individual pixels to design intent."

22.01.2026 15:27 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Some more πŸ”₯

"A pure 'pixel-perfect' approach treats every instance as a unique snowflake, which is the antithesis of a scalable, component-based architecture."

22.01.2026 15:27 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Rethinking β€œPixel Perfect” Web Design β€” Smashing Magazine Amit Sheen takes a hard look at the β€œPixel Perfect” legacy concept, explaining why it’s failing us and redefining what β€œperfection” actually looks like in a multi-device, fluid world.

This is fantastic by @amitsheen.bsky.social: "True perfection means a site that works for everyone. [...] 'Pixel perfect' often prioritizes visual aesthetics over functional accessibility [...]" πŸ”₯

www.smashingmagazine.com/2026/01/reth...

22.01.2026 15:27 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Orchestration as in for coding agents? I would say it's the exact opposite, breaking down tasks needs a lot of hands-on technical knowledge and management without that is generally horrible at it

21.01.2026 16:20 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

LLMs in this case are a shortterm and likely unsustainable bandaid for issues that are already caused by underinvestment and shorttermism, mostly appearing in proximity to bullshit tasks (following Graeber), i.e. where we do box-ticking, duct-taping or taskmaster-responding

18.01.2026 13:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

ChatGPTing e-mails that need to be formulated properly?Write less and accept communication in bullet points.

Need RAG because no one finds anything on your damn website? Fix your information architecture!

Transforming PDFs into structured data? Why didn't you invest in actual data infrastructure?

18.01.2026 13:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Trying to roughly collect and categorise ways that LLMs could be considered actually useful and one major category emerging is just bandaids for broken stuff

18.01.2026 13:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

@apply is way overused and I found it hard at times to make people see that but just using it *for everything* *by default* is brutal lol

09.01.2026 11:53 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

For what it's worth, "Tailwind solves problems that are made worse by our current organisation of labor and its gender aspects" is 1) true 2) not a difficult synthesis to make since all participants in this discussion are 90% of the way there

09.01.2026 09:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

A great deed, making fans of other clubs feel better since 2013 πŸ˜‚

07.01.2026 22:47 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not joking and this isn't funny. We have been trying to orchestrate the Weltgeist for more than 5,000 years. There are various options, not everyone is aligned. This team goes and does it overnight.

05.01.2026 19:40 πŸ‘ 110 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

claude code is fucking insane

i know literally NOTHING about Hegel. ZERO. and it just built me a complete system of German idealism

05.01.2026 18:49 πŸ‘ 971 πŸ” 144 πŸ’¬ 29 πŸ“Œ 16

Hegelly Blonde

05.01.2026 11:28 πŸ‘ 775 πŸ” 138 πŸ’¬ 15 πŸ“Œ 5
A screenshot showing that Google Balls followed me back

A screenshot showing that Google Balls followed me back

Let's goooooo #googleballs

05.01.2026 14:02 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Marin Aeschbach | Writing about Technology, History, and Philosophy Marin Aeschbach's personal website, featuring essays and short-form content connecting technology, history, and philosophy.

Rewrote marinaeschba.ch to Astro.

I made the site when I too deep into combining frameworks, but now I tossed out a lot of guff and replacing it with vanilla CSS. Really the best technical solution if you are comfortable with the cascade and know the new features!

05.01.2026 10:27 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0