Auri Jae Williams 🍉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇵🇸🇺🇦(they/them)

He is. Don’t get me wrong I love Sign of the times and As It Was but I find with this album he had a good idea but leant in to the influences, made it bit more bolder and energetic and less lacklustre

Hard agree fine at best. Was hoping it would build to something bigger.

You can’t quite hear those influences. Doesn’t feel comparable to Radiohead or LCD. The sound is too conventional in the sphere of dance-pop

A Rosa Luxemburg Bookshelf Rosa Luxemburg was a Polish-born Jewish revolutionary and one of the greatest theoretical minds of the European socialist movement and the author of numerous classic works, she participated in the fou...

Happy birthday to the great revolutionary and theorist, Rosa Luxemburg, born on this day in 1871.

Disasterous that the prime minister Sir Keir Starmer couldn’t rule out offensive operations within Iran and the Middle East v

Asylum seekers have the same chances as British citizens when they are in Britain.

But we need to find money to ,and grow the public purse, to actually have government policy that is skewed to supporting international refugees. Fundamentally we need to see lives of refugees and those who aren’t British nationals of equal value. Ultimately we should be ensuring that

Depends who it is like I was gutted when @agirlcalledlina blocked me but lot of the time it’s some nonsense accounts

bsky.app/profile/geor...

Read these words from 100 years ago about immigrants in Britain – and see how history is chillingly repeating itself | George Monbiot Shabana Mahmood’s new rights clampdown looks outlandish until we remember that this kind of hardline action is part of our country’s fabric, says George Monbiot

The precedent is eerily, chillingly precise. What the current Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is doing to immigrants and refugees today is almost a carbon copy of what Sir William Joynson-Hicks was doing 100 years ago. And that's not a good thing. My column.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Do you not see that we should be talking about taking in more asylum seekers and retirees and not having rhetoric that is tougher on asylum seekers or deemed to curtail their rights

UK to further curtail rights of asylum seekers Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood will tighten rules on access to accommodation and financial support

What’s up with the thinking emoji. You know what Shabana Mahmood is saying today www.ft.com/content/cac2...

Opinion Restoring order at the border speaks to Labour values. Without that, we won't be able to do anything else at all Shabana Mahmood Our approach, unlike that of the Greens and Reform, is in step with the British people. They don't want extremes - they want a system that is managed and fair Shabana Mahmood is the UK home secretary

This is a hot mess of outright lies and misinformation from the Home Secretary, designed to try and persuade people that a government which is implementing some of the most hostile anti-immigration/asylum policies, in practice, for decades is progressive. 1/

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Also the asylum seekers and refugees of foreign nationals this government should be caring about as well but no they are making things worse

It's like when the fascist Oswald Mosley's grandson, who Palantir hired to run its UK operations, appeared on Laura Kuenssberg wearing a black T-shirt.

None of this is accidental: it's all answering the question, 'what message do I want to send?' 'Fascism to immigrants' is the message Mahmood does.

This is the wrong decision. A seriously wrong decision at the wrong time for it. We have war in the Middle East from Palestine, Beirut, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, Lebanon and Oman all under attack and crisis in Iran. It’s now that calls for the best of humanity not selfish greed of nations.

@lintonstephens.bsky.social sounding good on Radio 3 Breakfast this week. Might be the perfect way to ease into the day. Soft and gentle.

They should not support the establishment but they have the ability to speak and act of their free will and it’s for us to say they are morally wrong.

We aren’t in a world war yet or have war on mainland. Parliament can function normally.

Who knows! We can disagree with her like I do but the leading opposition party gets to choose how it interpret the national interest

I didn’t misunderstand the opposition they are to challenge, question and act as a layer of check and balance on the government

There’s a special place in hell for the internet

These NAFOs seem a bunch of children

I agree

I’m not denying that he isn’t doing his job but it’s for parties to ask questions about how his government are responding to this crisis on behalf of their constituents. It’s not on Britain to intervene and take offensive action and side with US and Israel

It’s concerning of course. They don’t have to oppose it but seems like they chose to which I don’t agree with what and how they are doing what they are doing what they are doing

That’s how politics works. It doesn’t insist it allows. But what we can’t say is she is bound by rules ors to support because she is within her right to oppose we have the right to disagree and tolerate how the system functions

Well then the question is if America is an adversary the question should be shall we review our relationship with America. Problem is that the U.S isn’t currently classed as an adversary

Again No one is disagreeing about our own defence infrastructure

The Prime Minister is asked about abolishing leasehold.

He answers on management companies and ground rents that makes it really clear Labour have no intention of abolishing leasehold.

5 million people stuck paying service charges because Labour stand with property developers.